1000, Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0200150007-9 OTS/CB Memo #75-60 28 May 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: ORD/LSR ATTENTION SG1 I SUBJECT Request for your Criticism of the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) Results with the Random Stimulus Generator 1. In previous discussions you indicated your opinion that the Random Stimulus Generator data produced during the course of the "Perceptual Augmentation technique'T'~y Puthoff and Targ at SRI were of questionable value. You sighted information that it was your understanding th~_~machines were not random and other procedural difficulties asso- ciated with the experimental design. I explained that summary data and procedures were given in progress reports #3 and #4 and during the December briefing which you, unfortunately, were unable to attend. Also,, partially duplicative summaries may be found in the October 1974 Nature article published by Targ and Puthoff and in their final report for Contract 953653 under NASA sponsorship. The most complete reference is the final report being com- pleted for our contract. Attached is an advanced copy of the relevant section of the final report. 2. After review of the randomness tests and the experimental procedures described in these reports, I can find no fundamental difficulty with the machine or the procedures. It appears that SRI has done a thorough enough job to allow them to make the,conclusion that they have documented paranormal E2 IMPDET CL BY 033961 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0200150007-9 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0200150007-9 --'I- ~07~1 functioning within the stated statistical limits. Since I have no practical experience with designing and completing statistical experimental psychology tests, I could easily have overlooked some obvious mistake or omission which invalidates the SRI data and conclusions. Therefore I am requesting your aid. Specifically, are the machines random and the experimental procedures valid? In addition to the two specifics mentioned above, please locate and criticize any other "soft" areas so that the SRI research can be kept in proper perspective. OTS/CB Attachment: SG11 As stated Approved For Release 2000/08/10 CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0200150007-9 P Wiffiftrd Fib r Re I ENSfflo8/1 0: C 1A-RD P9(00j%-WRWR6 50007 -n SECRET SG1 1 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (optional) Request for your criticism of the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) Results with the Random Stimulus Gnerrator FROM: EXTENSIONNO, - OTS /CB Memo #75-60 2908 . DATE 28 May 1975 TO: (Officer designation,DATE room number, and OFFICER'SCOMMENTS (Number each comment building) to show from whom RECEIVEDFORWARDEDINITIALSto whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) C/OTS/CB 2. C/OTS/DED M Y 1975 C/ORD/LSR >/1W 1 4. - A C . 5. 6. 01L 7. (v, l!, 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Aw3roved For Release ROOO/OQ/10 ~-RDP916-00787ROO020015001,07-9 Cl FORM USE PREVIOUS [7 INTERNAL 3-62 610 EDITIONS SECRET CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED