12 March 1974 Progress Report No. 1 Covering the Period 28 January to 1 March 1974 Stanford Research Institute Project 3183 PERCEPTUAL AUGMENTATION TECHNIQUES by Harold E. Puthoff Client Private Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003109110: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 I OBJECTIVE The purpose of the program is to determine the characteristics of those perceptual modalities through which individuals obtain information about their environment, wherein such information is not presented to any known sense. The program is divided into two categories of investigation of approximately equal effort, applied research and basic research. The purpose of the applied research effort is to explore experimentally the potential for applications of perceptual abilities of interest, with special attention given to accuracy and reliability. The purpose of the basic research effort is to identify the characteristics of individuals possessing such abilities, and to identify neurophysiological correlates and basic mechanisms involved in such functioning. II PROGRESS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD A. Applied Research 1. Remote Viewing A number of efforts were begun with respect to obtaining further information concerning remote viewing phenomena. First, an experiment has been designed in consultation with SRI psychologists which will yield precise statistical data as to discrimination ability. Ten sites known to the subject are to be visited in random sequence by a target demarcation team. The subject must then make a choice as to which site is being visited, in addition to providing descriptive material for content analysis. Approved For Release 2003109110: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Secondly, a pilot series involving real-time questioning of the subject by the target team via walkic talkie is being explored to provide information for designing a protocol to investigate real-time correlations. One viewing with positive results has been carried out. Finally, a preliminary remote viewing pilot experiment was carried out with a subject (H.H.) previously screened by the EEG correlates experiment described in our paper submitted for pu blication (Appendix I). The target chosen at random was a small red clapboard schoolhouse structure with a bell steeple on top in a miniature golf course. The subject's response was that she saw a red clapboard structure with a steeple that seemed to be artificial as in a movie set. Based on this result, a series of remote viewing experiments under strict protocols are planned with this subject. 2. Detection of Variable Density Target Material Twenty-seven envelopes were submitted by the sponsor to the client containing target drawings of variable content and density. Several hundred sorting trials resulting from six passes per day through the 27 cards have been carried out, the goal to date being delineation of the. twelve low density target cards from the pencil (6) and blank (9) cards. The numbered envelopes containing the target material, sealed and specially secured by the sponsor, are randomized before each trial and placed inside non-numbered opaque envelopes before being presented to the subject for sorting. Statistical analysis of the results and comparison with the key (unknown to the client) will be carried out after completion of the experimental series. 2 Approved For Release 2003109110: C-IA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 B. Basic Research 1. Testing Program During the first month of this program, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) instrument was admini stered by SG1 I of Consultants International, Inc., to three subjects screened in other programs as being gifted in the area of paranormal perception. They are Mr. Patrick H. Price, screened for remote viewing ability, Mrs. Hella Hammid, screened for EEG correlates to remote stimuli, and Mr. Duane Elgin, screened for high scoring response to a random target generator. Further in-depth interviewing of the first two subjects was carried out by SG1 I and his colleague, A report is in SG1 I SG11 preparation byI and will be available to the contract technical representatives when completed. On the basis of discussion with technical representative, SRI representatives have consulted with a number of SG11 Bay Area neurophysiologists concerning administration of the Halstead- Reitan (H-R) Neuropsychology Test Battery. Those contacted include Dr. Karl Pribram. of the Stanford Medical School, Dr. Robert Ornstein of the Langley-Porter Neuropsy chiatric Clinic, and Dr. Donald Lim of the Veteran's Administration Hospital in Palo Alto. To date satisfactory arrangements for administration of the H-R instrument have not yet been made, as only the latter facility has personnel experienced in its administration, but not ordinarily available for subcontracted consulting. The three individuals named above have, however, agreed to help locate an appropriate individual or facility to. carry out such testing so no difficulty is anticipated in meeting this requirement. 3 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 A measure of the visual acuity of one subject (P.P.) was obtained utilizing one of the instruments available in the optics group of the Electronics and Bioengineering Laboratory of SRI. The measurement method involves forced-choice discrimination on the part of the subject between alternate zero and finite-contrast grating images, for each of a number of spatial-frequency gratings. (See Appendix II.) The system, which is automated, tracks and records the subject's forced-choice responses to yield a curve of threshold (75% correct choice) contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. As might be expected, higher contrast is required at the low and high frequency tails of the distribution, as compared with the middle range, to discriminate between grating and unif orm images. The purpose of the test with regard to our program was to determine whether a subject possessing an unusual ability to view remote stimuli also possessed an unusual visual acuity response in a threshold-determining instrument, either because of unusual acuity in the ordinary sense, or through the use of an extraordinary ability to discriminate between a target and a blank under conditions of vanishingly-small information content. The resultant curve lay within the range of expected human variation indicating no unusual response activity. 2. Measurement Progra i A 10-channel polygraph facility under the direction of Dr. Jerry Lukas of the Sensory Sciences Research Center has been brought into the program and certain functions tailored to our specification. The facility will be used initially to monitor GSR, blood flow (plethysmograph), and EEG activity of subjects carrying out tasks involving perception-of remote stimuli. For our purposes, the display of raw data has been augmented by a computer program which has been 4 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 INFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SENSORY SHIELDING Russell Targ Harold Puthoff Electronics and Bioengineering Laboratory Stanford Research Institute Menlo Park, California Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 FIGURE CAPTIONS 1. Target pictures and responses drawn by Uri Geller under shielded conditions. 2. Computer drawings and responses drawn by Uri Geller. a. Computer drawing stored on video display b. Computer drawing stored in computer memory only c. Computer drawing stored on video display with zero intensity 3. Occipital EEG spectra, 0 to 20 Hz, for one subject (H.H.) acting as receiver, showing amplitude changes in the 9 - 11 11z band as a function of strobe frequency. Three cases: 0, 6, and 16 flashes per second (12 trial averages). Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 LNTRODUCT ION In this paper we present results of experiments suggesting the existence of one or more perceptual modalities through which individuals obtain information about their environment, wherein this information is not presented to any known sense. Such perceptual abilities are often 1-3 considered to be paranormal. The literature in the field coupled with our own observations have led us to conclude that such abilities can be studied under laboratory conditions. The phenomena we have investigated most extensively pertain to the abiLity of certain individuals to describe graphical material or remote scenes shielded against ordinary perception. In addition, we also performed pitot studies to det ermine if electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings might Lndicate perception of remote happenings even in the absence of correcL overt responses. these experiments we concentrated on what we considered to be our primary rcsponsibility--namely, to resolve under conditions as unambiguous as possible the basic issue of whether a certain class of paranormal perception phenomena exists. Therefore, we conducted our experiments with sufficient control, utilizing visual, acoustic, and electrical shielding, to ensure that all conventional paths of sensory input were blocked. At all times we were vigilant in the design of our experiments to take measU17(-'S to prevent sensory leakage and to prevent deception, whether intentional or unintentional, on the part of our subjects. (.I Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Die overaIJ goa-1 of our research program is the determination of the laws tiiiderlying tliese phenomena. That is, Our goal is not just to catalog interesting events, but rather to uncover patterns of cause7effect rela- tionships that lend themselves to analysis and hypothesis in the forms w1th which we are familiar in scientific study. The results presented here constitute a first step toward that goal, in that we have established under known conditions a data base from which departures as a function of physical and psychological variables can be studied in future work. In this paper we describe three related experiments which we consider to represent a single ability exhibiting different rates of information 0 transmission. First, we conducted experiments with Mr. Uri Geller in which we examined his ability, while located in an electrically shielded room, to reproduce target pictures drawn by experimenters located at remote locations. Second, we ronducted double-blind experiments with two indivLduals, Mr. Ingo Swann and Mr. Pat Price, in which we measured their ability to describe remote outdoor scenes many miles from their physical location. Finally, we conducted preliminary tests using electroencephalo- grams (EEG), in which subjects were asked to perceive whether a remote -Light was flashing, and to determine whether a subject could perceive the presence of the light, even if only at a noncognitive level of awareness. RENOTE' PERCHIPTJON OF GRAPHIC MATERIAL We describe here a series of experiments in paranormal perception with a 27 year old Israeli subject, Uri Geller. In preliminary testing Mr. Geller apparently demonstrated an ability to reproduce simple pictures 2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003109/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 (I ine draw Ings ) which had been drawn and placed -in opaque sealed envelopes which Mr. Collor was not pi--rmitted to handle. However, since each of the targets was known to at least one experimenter in the room with Mr. Geller, it was not possible on the basis of the preliminary testing to discriminate beLween Mr. Geller's direct perception of envelope contents and perception via some mechanism involving the experimenters, whether paranormal or subliminal. Therefore, an experimental study was undertaken to examine the phenomenon under' conditions specifically designed to eliminate all convencional information channels, overt or subliminal. This was accomplished by separating Mr. Geller from both the target material and anyone knowledgeable of the target material, as in the recent experiments by Musso and Granero. 4 The first part of the study consisted of a series of thirteen separate drawing experiments carried out over a seven day period. The thirteen- experiment data set constitutes the entire set of consecutive experi menCs carried out in the time available for the study, with no experiments deleted. The protocol for the experiments was as follows: At the beginning of the experiment either Mr. Geller or the experimenters entered a shielded room so that from that time forward Mr. Geller was at all times visually, acousLically, and electrically shielded from personnel and material at the Lai-get location. Only following Mr. Geller's isolation from the experimenters was a target chosen and drawn, a procedure designed to eliminate pre- experiment cueing. The method of target selection involved random procedures, such as randomly opening a dictionary and selecting the first word describing in object that could reasonably be drawn. Furthermore, 3 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 in order to ellmLriate tho possibility of pro-experiment target forcing, Mr. Gell,er was kept ignorant as to the identity of the person selecting Llie target and as to the method of target selection. Mr. Geller's task was then to reproduce with pen on paper the line drawing being generated I)y the experimenters at the target location, Following a period of effort ranging from a few minutes to half an hour, Mr. Geller either passed (when lie did not feel confident) or indicated he was ready to submit a drawing to the experimenters, in which case the. drawing was collected before Mr. Geller was permitted to see the target. In order to prevent sensory cueing of the target information, Experiments 1 through 10 were carried out using a shielded room in SRI's facility for EEG research. The degree of acoustic and visual isolation provided for this experiment is that afforded by a double-walled steel room, locked by means of an inner and outer door, each of which is secured with a @efrigerator-type,locking mechanism. The person inside the room is continuously monitored by means of a one-way audio monitor. The target picture was never discussed by the experimenters after the picture was drawn or brought near the shielded room. In our detailed examination of the shielded room and the protocol used in these experiments, no sensory leakage has been found. The conditions and results for the ten experiments carried out in the shielded room are displayed in Table 1. As indicated in the Table, all experiments, except Experiments 4 and 5, were conducted with Mr. Geller closeted inside the shielded room. In Experiments 4 and 5, the procedure was reversed--i.e., the target was located inside the shielded room, with 4 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 written and debugged to provide on-line 5-second averages of EEG activity in the theta, alpha, and beta bands. Discussions are now in progress on experimental protocols to be employed in the utilization of this facility. EEG data taken prior to this program, @ut unanalyzed, has been subjected to analysis in an effort to-detormine whether a particular protocol was a viable instrument for defining correlates of remote perception. The description of the experiment and the results of the analysis is given in the EEG section of a paper submitted for publication to Nature, given here as Appendix I. In an effort to determine the effects of motivation on paranormal functioning, the following test procedure has been initiated. One subject (P.P.) has completed 7075 trials on guessing the state of a four-stage electronic random target generator without monetary reward being associated with the scoring, and is now repeating the series with a monetary reward scalea to scoring. Upon completion of the series, the results will be analyzed to determine whether the difference between scoring under the two conditions is significant. The reward system, shown in Table 1, is scaled linearly with difficulty. Table 1 REWARD SYSTEM FOR SCORING ON 25-TRIAL RUN, P=1/4 PER TRIAL Nr. hits/25-trial run,N Prob. of at least N hits Reward 10 .0.071 $ 1 11 12 0.030 2 0.010 5 13 0.0034 12 14 0.00092 35 5 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-kDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 TABLE 1. SUtTiARY* REMOTL PERCEPTION OF GRAPHIC MATERIAL Experiment Date Geller Location Target Location Target Figure 1 8/4/73 Shielded room #1a Adjacent room (4.1 m) b Firecracker la 2 8/4/73 Shielded room #1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Grapes lb 3 8/5/73 Shielded room #1 Office (475 m) Devil Ic 4 8/5/73 Room adjacent to Shielded room #1 Solar system Id shielded room #1 (3.2 m) 5 8/6/73 Room adjacent to Shielded room #1 Rabbit No drawing shielded room #1 (3.2 m) 6 8/7/73 Shielded room #1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Tree No drawing 7 8/7/73 Shielded room #1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Envelope No drawing 8 8/8/73 Shielded room #1 Remote room (6.75 m) Camel le 9 8/8/73 Shielded room #1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Bridge If 10 8/8/73 Shielded room #1 Adjacent room (4.1 m) Seagull Ig 11 8/9/73 Shielded room #2c Computer (54 m) Kite (computer CRT) 2a 12 8/10/73 Shielded room #2 Computer (54 m) Church (computer 2b m@mory) 13 8/10/73 Shielded room #2 Computer (54 m) Arrow through heart 2c (computer CRT, zero intensity) a EEG Facility shielded room (see text). b Perceiver-target distances measured in meters. c SRI Radio Systems Laboratory shielded room (see text). Approved For Release 2003/09110: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Mr. Cel 1cr oil the outside in in adjacent room. For those experiments in w1iich Mr. Geller was inside the shielded 1700111, the. target location was Lii all adjacent room at a distance of abouL 4 meters, except for Experiments 3 and 8, in which the target locations were, respectively, an office at a distance of 475 meters and a room down the half at a distance of about 7 meters. In Experiment l,the object drawn on the basis of random dictionary selection was a firecracker, shown in Fig. l(a). Mr. Geller's immediate verbal response via the audio monitor was that he saw "a cylinder with iloise coming out of it." Ile made two responses to the target, also shown in Fig. i(a). In Experiment 2, the target--also chosen by random dictionary selection-- was a cluster of grapes. Mr. Geller said that he was quite certain that lie had the picture. Both the target picture and Mr. Geller's response have 24 grapes in the cluster (Fig. l(b)). In Experiment 3, Mr. Geller was locked in the shielded room with one experimenter outside as a monitor while the target was drawn in another building 475 meters away. The target, again randomly selected from the dictionary, was a devil (Fig. l(c)). Mr. Geller spent 30 minutes on his drawing and expressed considerable difficulty in getting the target. The results are interesting from the standpoint of possible insight into the process that they provide. His drawings consisted of representations of Biblical symbology, including the "Mose!j tablets," an apple with a worm, a snal, e, and a concluding composite picture with the tablets on top of the world and the trident outside. Of these only the trident corresponds 6 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 SNOUIGNOD (130-131HS H3GNn 831130 wn AS NMVUO S3SNOdS3U CINV S3Hniold 1398VI Jo ONUSISNOO -]Vld31VA -lV3lHdVUD L 3u no i:j C@ 0 3SNOdS3H co @co t- o a) CL 3SNOdSgld @-4 17 3SNOdS3H (q) (')C 3SNOdS3U Z 3SNOdS38 @J' CL Rj"t L3SNOdS38 J-30MV1 RSNOdS38 1398VI (P) 3SNOdS3U Z 3SNOdS38 @,,gz@, 0-- 0 L BSNOdS3H 13obvi C@ co Il- 0 0 a) a) Cl) 04 0 LL > 0 CL CL Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 dit@UCLIV to 011 elelflOlit ill the target drawing. One Ls led LO spec-IiLate that the Biblical elements in these three drawings are perhaps associaLional material triggered by the target. The target picture for Experiment 4 was drawn by an experimenter whi-le lie was inside the shielded room,with Mr. Geller outside the room with another experimenter. In this case the target (Fig. l(d)) was a representation of the solar system. Mr. Geller's response to the target while outside the room coincides quite well with the target drawing. In Experiment 5, the person-Lo-person link was eliminated by arranging for a scientist outside the usual experimental group to draw a picture, lock it in the shielded room 'before Mr. Geller's arrival at SRI, and leave the area. Mr. Geller was then led by the experimenters to the shiolded room and asked to draw the picture inside the room. Ile said that lie got no clear impression and therefore did not submit a drawing. The elimination of the person-to-person link was examined further in the second series of experiments with this subject, which is described later. Experiments 6 and 7 were carried out while we recorded Mr. Geller's EEG during his efforts to perceive the target pictures. The target pictures were, respectively, a tree and an envelope. He found it difficult to hold adequately still for good EEG records, said that the experienced difficulty in getting impressions of the targets, and again submitted no drawings. For Experiment 8, the target picture was a camel and Mr. Geller's re-spoiise was a horse (Fig. l(e)). In Experiment 9, the target was a bridge. Mr. CeLler's drawing bears some resemblance to the target (Fig. l(f)), but before seeing the target picture lie stated that lie did not know what the piCtUre was. 8 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 At: the beginning of Experiment 1.0, Mr. Geller expressed extreme confidence and entered the shielded room. The target then chosen for Experiment 1.0 was a bird in flight. Mr. Geller said almost immediately, via the audio monitor in the shielded room, that he saw a swan flyin.g over a hill and that lie was sure that his drawing wns.correct (Fig. 1(g)). Experiments 11 through 13 were carried out in SRI's Engineering Building, to make, use of the Computer facilities available there. For these experiments, Mr. Geller was secured in a double-walled, copper-screen Faraday cage 54 meters down the hall and around the corner from the Computer room._@ For Experiment 11, a picture of a kite was drawn by one of the experimenters on the face of a cathode ray tube display screen, driven by the computer's graphics program. Mr. Geller's response, shown in F[g. 2(a), was a square with diagonals. For Experiment 12, a picture of a church was drawn and stored in the memory of the computer. Mr. Geller's responses are shown in the drawings of Fig. 2(b). Although his responses have some elements in common with the target drawing, tie did not recognize the target as a church. In Experiment 13, the target drawing, an arrow through a heart (Fig. 2(c)), was drawn on the face of the cathode ray tube and then the display intensity was Lurned off so that no picture was visible. Mr. Geller immediately The Faraday cage. provides 120 dB attenuation for plane wave radio frequency radiation over a range of 15 Kllz to I Gllz. For magnetic fields the attenuation is 68 dB at 15 Kllz an.d decreases to 3 dB at 60 Hz. 9 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 'AIISN31NI 083Z HIIM ),V-ldSIC) OaGIA NO (13HOiS 3uniold (0) 'A-lNO AHOA3A U31ndAOD NI (13UOJ-S 3@jn-Lold (q) *AV-ldSI(I 03GIA NO 03UOis 3unioid 'H3-1-13D iun H-LIM S-LN3NlH3dX3 DNIMVUCI u3indNOO AOUJ -m@131vA -IVOIHdVul) Z 3um)ij (3) Z 3SNOdS3U L 3SNOdS3H (q) Z 3SNOdS3U @o L 3SNOdS38 139MVI M 3SNOdS3d 130UVI Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 drew an irrOW under a rectangle and Lheri drew another arrow inside a suit- case, wliicli fie con@,Ldered a better representation of the target. To obtain Lin independent evaluation of the correlation between target and response data, the experimenters Submitted tfie data for judging on a "blind" basis by two SRI scientists who were not otherwise associated with Clio research. For the ten cases in which Mr. Geller provided a response, the judges were asked to match the res onse data with the p corresponding target data (without replacement). In those cases in which Mr. Geller made more than one drawinc, as his response to the target, all the drawings were combined as a set for judging. The two judges each matched the target data to the response data with no error. For either judge such a correspondence has an a priori probability, under the null - 1 "' 10-7. liypoffiesis of no information channel, of p = (10!) 3 x Th(.quality of match between target and response in certain cases, together with the overall probability of matching obtained by the judges, constitute strong evidence for the existence of a potentially useful information channel. A second series of experiments was carried out to determine whether direct perception of envelope contents was possible without some person knowing of the target picture. One hundred target pictures of everyday objects were drawn by an SRI artist and sealed by other SRI personnelin double envelopes containing black cardboard. The hundred targets were divided randomly into groups of 20 for use in each of the three clays' experiments. Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 On each of the three (lays of these experiments, Mr. Celler passed. That Ls, fie declined to associate any envelope. with a drawing that he made. On each day lie made approximately 12 recognizable drawings, which lie felt were associated with the entire target pool of 100. He seemed to be disturbed by the existence of such a large target pool. 0 n each of the three days, two of his drawings could reasonably be associated with two of the 20 daily targets. On the third day, two of his drawings were very close replications of two of that day's target pictures. We consider that the drawings resulting from this experiment do not depart significantly from what would be expected by chance, which appeared to be Mr. Geller's conclusion also, leading to passes on his part. Thus, it would appear that eliminating a person knowledgeable of the target degrades the quality of the information channel. However, based on Mr. Geller's subjective impression, there is also the possibility that advance preparation of a large target pool, in comparison with single target preparation,results in cross talk--i.e., diffuses the identity of the target. In a simpler experiment Mr. Geller was successful in obtaining information in which no persons were knowledgeable of the target. A double blind experiment was performed in which a single die was placed in a small steel box. The box was then vigorously shaken by one of the experimenters and placed on the table. The orientation of the die within the box was unknown to the experimenters at that time. Mr. Geller would then write down his perception as to which die face was uppermost. Thus, in this 12 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 case the target pool- was known, but the targets were individually prepared fn a manner blind to all persons involved in the experiment. This experi- ment was performed ten times, with Mr. Geller passing twice and giving a response eight times. In the eight times in which he gave a response, lie was correct each time.t The probability of this occurring by chance 8 is approximately one in a million,(1/6) To summarize the work with Mr. Geller,5 we observe that in certain situations significant information transmission can take place under shielded conditions. Factors which appear to be important and therefore candidates for future investigation include whether the subject knows the set of targets in the target pool, the actual number of targets in the target pool at any given time, and whether the target is known by any of the experimenters. REMOTE VIEWING OF NATURAL TARGETS In experiments carried out in our program to investigate the abilities of a New York artist, Mr. Ingo Swann, he expressed the opinion that the insights gained during experiments at SRI had strengthened his ability to view remote locations that had been researched before he joined the SRI program.6 To test Mr. Swann's assertion, a pilot study was set up in which a TThe distribution of responses consisted of three 2s, one 4, two 5s, and two 6s. 13 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003109/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 series of targets from around the globe were supplied to the experimenters by SRI personrieL on a double-blind basis. In our estimation, Mr. Swann's abi.Lity to describe correctly details of buildings, roads, bridges, and the like indicated that Ile Could perceive remote'locations, sometimes in great detail, given only their geographic latitude and longitude. Thus, we considered the descriptions were Sufficiently accurate to warrant our setting Lip a research program in remote viewing. We present here the resuits of a remote viewing experiment, carried Out wiLli a second subject in the remote viewing program, Mr. Pat Price, a former California police commissioner and city councilman. This experi- mo.nL consistod of a series of double-blind, demonstration-of-ability tests Lnvol.ving local targets in the San Francisco Bay area which could be documented by several independent judges. We planned the experiment considerLng that natural,geographical places or man-made sites that have existed for a long time are more potent targets for paranormal perception experLments than are artificial targets prepared in the laboratory. This is based on the opinions of Mr. Swann and Mr. Price that the use of artificial targets involves a "Crivialization of the ability" as compared w.1.0i natural. pre-existing targets. In eacli uf nine experiments involving Mr. Price as remote-viewing subject and SRI experimenters as a target demarcation team, a remote Location was chosen in a double-blind protocol. 'Mr. Price, who remained ,-JL SRI, was asked to describe this remote location, as well as whatever acti-viLies might be going on there. 14 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 [Mta from the iiiiie experiments @ii-e presented in the following para- @,I-ZIJ)11S. Final. jUdgillg indicated that several descriptions yielded sLgiaficantly correct data pertaining to and descriptive of the target location. REMOTE, VIEWING PROTOCOL In the nine double-blind remote-viewing experiments, the following procedures were used. An experimenter was closeted with Mr. Price at ,,, Co wait 30 minutes SM to begin the narrative description of the remote locatLon. The SRI locations from which the subject viewed the remote locaLLons consistedof an outdoor park (Experiments 1,2), the double-walled copper-screen Faraday cage discussed earlier (Experiments 3, 4, 6-9), and an office (Experiment 5). A second experimenter would then obtain a target location from an individual in SRI management, the director of the Information Science and Engineering Division, not otherwise associated with the experiment. This location was either in the form of traveling orders previously prepared, SCMled, and randomized by the target selecter (Experiments 1, 2, 5, 6), or by his driving the target demarcation team to the target himself without any written indication (Experiments 3, 4, 7-9). The set of targets was chosen from a target-rich environment by asking the selector to use his judgment in providing a set of nine target locations which were clearly diFferenLiated from each other and withia thirty minutes driving time from SR1. In all cases, the target demarcation team proceeded directly to the target by automobile without communicating with the subject 15 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 (,I- experimeiiCers remaining belihid. Since the experimenter remaining WiLli [lie subjee'L at SRT was in ignorance both as to the particular target and also as to the target pool, lie was free to question Price to clarify his descripLi-ons. The demarcation team then remained at the target site fo.r ,III agreed-upon thirty minute period fbIlowing the thirty minutes allotted for travel. During the observation period, the- remote-viewing subject would describe his impressions of the target site into a tape recorder. A comparison was then made when the demarcation team returned. To represent best the detail an'd style of these narratives, we have included the entire unedited text of one of the better narratives containing very few incorrect statements, Experiment 7, in an appendix. In general, the descriptions contained inaccuracies as well as correct statements. To obtain a numerical evaluation of the accuracy of the remote viewing experiment, the nine original target locations were subjected to independent judging on a'blind basis by five SRI scientists who were not otherwise associated with the research. The judges were asked to match the nine locations, which they independently visited, against the typed manuscripts of the tape-recorded narratives of the remote viewer. The transcripts were unlabeled and presenLed in random order. The judges were asked to find a narrative which they would consider the best match for each of the places they visited. A given narrative could be assigned to more than one target location. The hypothesis is that the judges, when asked to match the actual targets with the transcripts, would place Lhe actual target in the most favored category more often than they would be expected to by chance. Table 2 shows the distribuLion of the 16 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 V V 0 < M CL -n 0 M M Q0 0 T 00 -4 PLACES VISITED BY JUDGES DESCRIPTIONS CHOSEN BY JUDGES 2 3 4 5 6 7 ABC Hoover Tower I C J D DE E Baylands Nature 2 ABC E D D Preserve Radio Telescope 3 ACD BE ABD Redwood City Marina 4 CD E E f Bridge Toll Plaza 5 ABD DCE Drive-In Theatre 6 B A C E Arts and Crafts ABC 7 Garden Plaza E Church C AB Rinconada Park 9 CE AB V V -1 0 < M CL -n 0 W M 1%) 0 0 0 0 > 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE 2. Distribution of correc.t selections by Judges A, B, C, D, aiid E in remoLe viewing experiments. Of the 45 selections (5 judges, 9 choices), 24 were correct. Boxes heavily outlined indicate correct choice. Approved For Release 2003109110: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 judges' choices. For purposes of display we present the table such that the main diagonal corresponds to the correct choices. The number of correct matches by judges A through E is 7, 6, 5, 3, and 3, respectively. The expected number of correct matches from the five judges was five; in the.experiment twenty-four such matches wer@-_ obt-ained. Among al 1 possible analyses, none is more conservative than a permutation analysis of the majority vote of the judges' selections assuming assignment without replacement. By majority vote, six of the nine descriptions and locations were correctly matched. Under the null hypothesis (no remote viewing and a random selection of descriptions without replacement), this outcome has an a priori probability of p 5.6 x 10- 4, since, among all possible permutations of the integers one through nine, the probability of six or more being in their natural position in the list has that value. Therefore, although Price's descrip- tions contain inaccuracies, the descriptions are sufficiently accurate to permit the judges to differentiate among the various targets to the degree indicated. EEG EXPERIMENTS An experiment was undertaken to determine whether a physiological measure such-as EEG activity could be used as an indicator of information transmission between an isolated subject and a remote stimulus. We hypothesized that perception could be indicated by such a measure even in the absence of verbal or other overt indicators. 7,8 In other words, this experiment examines the hypothesis that perception may take place. 18 700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09110: CIA-RDP96-00787ROOO Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 ,-1L lioncognitive tevels of awareness and be measurable, even thoulgh not expressed verbally. it was assumed that the application of remote stimuli would result in responses similar to t1iose obtained under conditions of direct stimu- laLion. For example, when normal subjects are stimulated with a flashing light, their EEG typically shows a decrease in the amplitude of the resting rhythm and a driving of the brain waves at the frequency of the flashes. 9 We hypothesized that if we stimulated one subject in this manner (a sender), the EEG of another subject in a remote room with no flash present, (a receiver), might show changes in alpha (9-11 Hz) activity, or possibly E'EG driving similar to that of the sender. Applying this concept, we informed our subject that at certain times a light was to be flashed in a sender's eyes in a distant room, and if the subject perceived that event, consciously or unconsciously, it might be evident from changes in his EEG output. The receiver was seated in the visually opaque, acoustically and electrically shielded double-walled steel room previously described. The sender was seated in a room across the hall from the EEG chamber at a distance of about 7 meters from the receiver. In order to find subjects who were responsive to such a remote stimulus, we initially worked with four female and two male volunteer subjects, all of whom believed that success in the experimental situation might be possible. These were designated "receivers." The senders were CLLher other subjects or the experimenters. We decided beforehand to run one or two sessions of 36 trials each with each subject in this seleccLon procedure,and to do a more extensive study with any subject 19 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 w1iose resuILS were positive. A Grass PS-2 photostimulator placed about I meter in front of the sender was used to present flash trains of 10 see duration. The receiver's E17G activity from the occipital region (OZ), referenced to linked mastoids, was amplified with a Grass 5P-1 preamplifier and associated driver amp-lilier with a bandpass of 1 to 120 Hz. The EEG data were recorded on magnetic tape with an Ampex SP 300 recorder. On each tr-ial, a tone burst of fixed frequency was presented to both sender and receiver, and was followed in one second by either a ten-second train of flashes or a null flash interval presented to the sender. Thirty- six such trials were given in an experimental session, consisting of 12 null trials--i4e., no flashes following the tone--12 trials of flashes at 6 fps, and 12 trials of flashes at 16 fps, all randomly intermixed. Each of the trials generated an 11-second EEG epoch. The last 4 seconds of the epoch was selected for analysis to minimize the desynchronizing action of the warning cue. This 4-second segment was subjected to Fourier analysis on a LINC 8 computer. Spectrum analyses gave no evidence of EEG driving in any receiver, although in control runs the receivers did exhibit driving when physically stimulated with the flashes. However, of the six subjects studied iniLially, one. subject (H.11.) showed a consistent alpha blocking effect. We therefore undertool, further study with this subject. Data from 7 sets of 36 trials each were collected from this subject on three separate days. This comprises all the data collected to date WILII this subject urid-er the test conditions described above. The alpha 20 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 [);in(( was identified from average spectra, then scores of average power ;ITICI peal, power were obtained from individual trials and subjected to statistical analysis. Of our six subjects, H.H. had by far the most monochromatic EEG spectrum. Figure 3 shows an overlay of the three averaged spectra from one of this subject's 36-trial runs, displaying changes in her alpha activity for the three stimulus conditions. Mean values for the average power and peak power for each of the seven experimental setsweregiven in Table 3. The power measures were less in the 16 fps case than in the 0 fps in all seven peak power measures and in six out of seven average power measures. Siegel's two-tailed t approximation to the nonparamecric randomization test 10 was applied to the data from all sets, which included two sessions in which the sender was removed. Average power on trials associated with the occurrence of 16 fps was significantly less than when there were no flashes (t = 2.09, df = 118, p < .04). The second measure, peak power, was also significantly less in the 16 fps conditions than in. the null condition (t = 2.16, df = 118, p < .03). The average response in the 6 fps condition was in the same direction as that associated with 16 fps, but the effect was not statistically significant. Spec trum analyses of control recordings made from saline with 12K ohms resistance in place of the subject with and without the addition of a 10 tiz, 50 1AV test signal applied to the saline solution, revealed no indicaLions of flast i frequencies, nor perturbations of the 10 Ilz signal. These controls suggest that the results were not due to system artifacts. 21 Approved For Release 2003/09/10: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Lu 0 THREE CASES 0, 6 and 16 Hz flashes (12 trial averages) FIGURE 3 OCCIPITAL EEG FREQUENCY SPECTRA, 0 TO 20 Hz, OF ONE SUBJECT (H.H.) ACTING AS RECEIVER SHOWING AMPLITUDE CHANGES IN THE 9-11 Hz BAND AS A FUNCTION OF STROBE FREQUENCY 22 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 5 Hz 10 Hz 15 Hz Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Flash F a sh Frequency Fr equency Sender Sender 0 Average Power 6 16 iI 11 0 Peak Power 6 16 J.L. 94.8 84.1 76.8 357.7 329.2 289.6 R.T. 41.3 45.5 37.0 160.7 161.0 125.0 No Sender 25.1 35.7 28.2 87.5 95.7 81.7 (Subject informed) J.L. 54.2 55.3 44.8 191.4 170.5 149.3 J.L. 56.8 50.9 32.8 240.6 178.0 104.6 R.T. 39.8 24.9 30.3 145.2 74.2 122.1 No Sender (Subject not 86.0 53.0 52.1 318.1 180.6 202.3 informed) Averages 56.8 49.9 43.1 11 214.5 169.8 153.5 -12% -24% (P<.04) -21% -28% (P<.03) TABLE 3. EEG data for H.H. showing average power and peak power in the 9 - 11 Hz band, as a function of flash frequency and sender. Each table entry is an average over 12 trials. 23 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Further also gave no evidence of radio frequency energy associated with the stimulus. Subjects were asked to indicate their conscious assessment for each trL.11 as to which stimulus was generated. They made their guesses known to the experimenter via one-way telegraphic commfinication. An analysis of these guesses has shown them to be at chance, indicating the absence of any supraliminal cueing. Thus, we note that in this pilot study, one of six subjects showed significant EEG changes associated with the presence of remote stimuli under conditions of sensory shielding. This form of noncognitive arousal evidenced by alpha blocking has also been observed by Tart (1963), using a small electric shock stimulus applied to himself as sender in a similar experiment. 7 We hypothesize that the protocol described here may prove to be useful as a screening procedure for latent remote perceptual ability in the general population. DISCUSSLON We have presented evidence for the existence of a biological informa- tion channel whose characteristics appear to fall outside the range of known perceptual modalities. The precise nature of the channel or channels is as yet undefined, but may involve either direct perception of hidden information content, perception of mental images of persons knowledgeable of target information, precognition, or some combination of these or other information channels. 24 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 We have worked with three individuals, two of whom are reported on in detail here, whose remote perceptual abilities were sufficiently developed that they were able to describe both pictorial and geographical material blocked from ordinary perception. Inaddition to experiments which centered on subjects' conscious perceptions, we have also conducted EEG experiments in which we have found statistically significant evidence of direct physiological indications of nonconscious perception of remote stimuli. The observation that a nonconscious link with physiological correlates can exist between separated Lndividuals is one that merits considerable study. From these experiments we conclude that ~ A channel exists whereby information about a remote location can be obtained by means of an as yet unidentified perceptual modality. ~ As with all biological systems, the information channel appears to be imperfect, containing noisealong with the signal. ~While a quantitative signal-to-noise ratio in the information- theoretical sense cannot as yet be determined, the results of our experiments indicate that the functioning is at the level of usefL11 information transfer. It may be that remote perceptual ability is widely distributed in the general population, but because the perception is generally below an individual's level of awareness, it is repressed or not noticed. For example, two of our subjects (H.11. and P.P.) I-Lad not considered themselves to have unusual perceptual ability before their participation in these 25 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003109110: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 X p C r L me 1-1 t s .We conjecture that it is partially the prevailing philosophical attitudes of the times in which we live that prevent such ability as may exLst from surfacing to a greaLer extent. Our shared cultural constraints deny permission for the demonstration of such abilities. WLLh regard to the@ methodology itself, our observation of the phonom- ena Leads us to conclude that experiments in the area of so-called paranormal phenomena can be scientifically conducted. The results presented here offer a basis from which departures as a function of other observables can be studied. Our goal for future experimentation is the investigation of the physical and psychological laws underlying these phenomena, rather than just the addition of further demonstrations of the statistical appearance of paranormal phenomena in the laboratory. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was sponsored by The Foundation for Parasensory Investi- gaLion, Now York City. We wish to thank its president, Mrs. Judith Skutch, and their representative, Dr. Edgar D. Mitchell of the Institute of Noetic Sciences--as well as our SRI associates, Mr. Bonnar Cox, Mr. Earle Jones, and Dr. Dean Brown--for their support and encouragement throughout this work. We also wish to acknowledge Dr. Wilbur Franklin of Kent State Uni- ver'Sity for his contribution, especially in the early phases of this research. Finally, we acknowledge the many constructive suggestions provided us through conversations with Mrs. Joan Mayo, Dr. Charles Tart, University of California, and Dr. Robert Ornstein and Dr. David Galin of the Langley Porter NeuropsychiaLric Institute. 26 Approved For Release 2003109110 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2. REFERENCES I. J. PratL, J.B. Rhine, C. Stuart and J. Greenwood, EXTRA SENSORY PERCEPTION AFTER STXTY YEARS, Now York, Henry Holt, 1940. 2. S. Soal and F. Bateman, MODERN EXPERIMENTS IN TELEPATHY, London, Faber and Faber, 1954. 3. L.L. Vasilliev, EXPERIMENTS IN MENTAL SUGGESTION, Hampshire, England, ISMI Publications, 1963. 4. J.R. Musso and M. Granero, "An ESP Drawing Experiment With a High- Scor!Lig Subject," J. of Parapsychology, Vol. 37, pp. 13-37, March, 1973. 5. It Itas been widely reported that Mr. Geller has demonstrated the ability to bend metal by paranormal means. Although metal bending by Mr. Geller has been observed in our laboratory, we have not been able to combine such observations with adequately controlled experiments to obtain data sufficient to support the paranormal hypothesis. 6. K. Osis, ASPR Newsletter, No. 14, Summer, 1972. 7. C.T. Tart, PHYSIOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF PSI COGNITION, Intl. J. of Parapsychology, Vol. V, No. 4, Autumn, 1963. 8. E.D. Dean, "Plethysmograph Recordings as ESP Responses," Intl. J. of Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 2, October, 1966. 9. D. Hill and G. Parr, ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY: A SYMPOSIUM ON ITS VARIOUS ASPECTS,. Macmillan, New York, 1963. 10. S. Siegel, NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, pp. 152-156, New York, McCraw-Hill Book.Co., Inc., 1956. 27 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 APPENDIX Following is the uneaited transcript of remoto viewing Experiment 7, where the target was an Arts and Crafts 'Garden Plaza. This is a large plaza resembling a California m 'ission. There are craft shops around the perimeter of the plaza. In the plaza area are many gardens, flowers, ceramic pots, fountains, and paths. Overhead arQ vines on arbors of redwood. Price's description is accurate in almost every detail and he omitted little of importance. 1:40 THIS IS A REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT WITH PAT PRICE, DEAN BROU'N, AND RUSSELL'TARG IN THE SHIELDED ROOM IN BUILDING 30. THE TRAVELLERS TO REMOTE LOCATION ARE BART COX, HAL PUTHOFF, JUDY SCHMICKLEY AND PHYLLIS COLE. WE EXPECT THE TRAVELLERS TO BE AT THEIR PLACE IN ABOUT 10 MINUTES. IT'S 1:58. OUR TRAVELLERS SHOULD BE NEAR TO ARRIVING AT THE PLACE. OK. Why don't I start scanning by quadrant using this as a center point. L2-3, 6-9 ...... I'll go from 12-3 first. Seems to me right now that I'm picking them up in the 12-3 quadrant, but I'll go on in the rest and look. I haven't actually identified them, I just feel that they're there. Nope, I don't get them there. Now I'll go from 6-9. While I was looking at 6-9, it looks to me like I'm looking at an iris, a flower of some kind. I'll come back and identify that later. Just wanted to get it down as having a flash of an iris flower-purplish. I'll continue to scan that quadrant. Nope, don't get them there. I'll go from 9-12. Don't get them there. I'll go back 12-3. Yeah, I got them in that quadrant. Now I'll see if I can locate them physically and identify the area. I'm looking at something that looks like an arbor, trellis-work arbor. Seems to be cool, shaded. Doesn't seem to me that they're out in the direct sunlight. Be more like there's lots of trees, in an arbor area. 1 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 The arbor appears to be made of wood, possibly redwood. They'ru Just .... tooks like it's a dirt path, quite wide, I'd say maybe 12 feet. I can see some grass. L6oks like possibly a fountain of some kind. Yeah, I can see Bart in his red shirt and what looks like kind of a gray paisley tie - I didn't really look at that when he was down there. The red shirt, I did. Looks like he has on a gray paisley tie. It appears they're walking along quite leisurely. Looks like there's some red brick laid into a walkway, They don't seem to be on it, they just seem to pass over that. I get - it seems like a little ways away from them there, are quite a few people but right where they're walking it doesn't appear to be many right in there. This is an arbor area, Back of that arbor, back here I'd say 50 feet from that arbor to here, seems to be a lot of people in here. They were walking along here on what looks like about a 12 foot dirt path. MIAT KIND OF PLACE IS TIIE.ARBOR IN? IS IT A FIELD OUT IN THE OPEN? No, I want to say,park, but it doesn't exactly feel like a park, if you took a - the feeling I'm getting - it's not the specific place - but Like the Town and Country Market. That type of an atmosphere, with quite a section of it into a little outdoor park, but basically I'm getting a very strong feeling of flowers, Like the first one I saw was an iris. TELL ME ABOUT THE TOWN AND COUNTRY ASPECT. IN WHAT WAY DOES IT REMIND YOU OF TOWN AND COUNTRY. The buildings, not right where they're at, but very close to them have that same kind of architecture and look. The parking lot looks similar, gi,and, sweeping, not cluttered, it's more expansive area. You take a place like Sears Mall - it seems cluttered. This seems more leisurely paced. People are moving ab0,L1t SIOW01' - there's not the ht19tI(,' and bUStle, - morc, or less meandering. 2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 TOWN AND COUNTRY MEANS TO ME A CCVERED WALKWAY. Yeall, the back of them it seems to be - where they are seems to be a very large, arbor like vines growing over it and things, and there possi- bly - I haven't looked in there yet to see if there's any displays like poLtery and things - I get the feeling that there is right close to it. ALSO, OUTDOORS? Yeah, it seems like fairly high shade trees - kinda bordering. The center part doesn't s'eem to have it - this part in here. The trees seem to be way up in here along like this over here. This seems to be shaded in here, but it's sunny out here. I just saw something that looked like a windmill - not a farm type wind- mill - a Dutch-type windmill . It's smaller - it's not a huge thing, but I'm getting a definite feeling that it's like a windmill. The area in there feels damp - not wet - they're not walking in water, but it'S Very moist. The temperature in there ... it's secluded. Feels very comfortable. A little on the shady side. WHAT DO YOU FIND AS THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PLACE THEY'RE AT? Outside of this little park-like affair that they seem to be in, there's a street. One side of it seems to be a kind of a residential...the other seems to be a little bit more heavily travelled. Let me pick up a little bit more. I can see one very large oak tree - exceptionally large. Right now Bart is trying to point something out that is basically the significance of the whole place . It's like that Rey thing, well, if you'd have montioned a salt pile I'd have blown my lid. Well, this has a significance that's just about comparable to that. I'm screening it out. Thing that just flashed in was kind of like a stadium structure - like looking clown into a stadium, Just when I did that I - I'll have to reorient to make sure I'm looking in the same area now., 3 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Seems L Me Lhey' re - I stit L get them in the same quadrant I had them in orig-inally. Seents lAire some decorative brick walls. QUADRANT YOU HAD THEM IN IS BASICALLY 'ME NORMEAST QUADRANT? Yeah, I got them out about this far - it's not far away - I'd say in this direction over here about - feels like a mile to a mile and a half. They don't feel as far away, and I'm not looking. at the time continuum. They actually don't feel as far away. I'd say that it is about - not half the distance they were to the marina, and it seems to.be on a line just about in that direction but just a hair more - rather than a direct line from here to the marina - they seem to be just slightly more to the left of that line, I was looking back to where he had the car parked and it seems like it's on asphalt then a curb in front, and then it's like a dirt walkway and then a sidewalk. But I can see eficalyptus buds on the ground and some branches of eucalyptus there. On(-, of the most dominant things to me in the way of unusualness is the size of the oak tree that I'm looking at. Looks like an arboretum, or I get the definite feeling of flowers. Almost get the feeling like it's commercial flowers. In fact, the most predominant feeling that I'm getting right now is flowers. Don't know why iris particularly. T'here's something about the windmill that I was going to look at. Wasn' t thaL what you were .... ? Be like one you'd almost see in a miniature golfcourse-the windmill. Has all the construction and detail but not as large - it's fairly small. Seems to be made out of dark redwood and it's kind of aged. L'm goii)g to try to look more directly to them. Let's see, there's Bart and Hal, and behind Bart is Judy and behind Hal is Phyllis, kinda stag- gered there. Looks like a possible small pool of water - like a garden pond. Looks lil@e a little bridge. 4 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 I was trying to get the feeling of what type of an area it was. Let me elevate a bit. I'm looking at much too small an area. There's some, greater significance there that I feel I'm definitely not looking at - let's jack up a bit ... maybe 500 feet. I see a lot of trees. I see Judy's red hair and her brown eyes and her'flashing teeth - she has beautiful teeth. Hadn't really looked at them before. Phyllis and her are talking about something and Hal and Bart are talking about something and he's pointing at something and it seems to me that lie's pointing over to what I'd call a windmill or something that looks Like a windmill. The water I see looks more like a pool or a pond than it does - you know, it's not big like a lake - not very large, but it looks like a definite pool. Right where they're at I don't hear too much traffic noise - it seems to be fairly quiet. Looks like a little wooden walkway. Feels a little early, b@it it kinda seems like they're retracing their steps heading back toward the car, but they're still moving quite leisurely. IF YOU LOOK DOWN ON THE PLACE FROM ABOVE, CAN YOU GET ANY FEELING FOR THE - IS THERE ANY OVERALL LAYOUT OR PLAN? When I went up I could see trees and stuff, and I kind of got the feeling of like in a corner of a golf course, you know - where there would be a lot of trees overhanging the green and some things in there - that seemed to be out of context, but when I elevated, that's what I got. It kind of looked like an overlap to me so I didn't talk about it, but I will. When I elevated it kind of felt like it was right over the corner of a goLl COUrse of some kind, with a street running down one side, and they are fairl@ close to that. In fact, the bricked area that I looked at or like a patio thing kinda Looks like a walkway. Seems like there's small building - small meaning not tall - looks like a single story building. Looks like it has a flat roof - sli-litly pitchod, Looks like 4 x 4 poles supporting it - has a 5 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 A goved For.Releclpe 2QO3/09/1 0 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 callopT )ML over it. hey re painte d white, place looks like very possible Light. yelLow or cream color. They're, walking not too far from that. Still seems to me that they're on a dirt pathway. In the area that they're in now I get flowers again - where before they kinda fell out of the flowers. Looks like maybe 80-100 yards from where they are - looks like 2 guys on a motor scooter. They can see them, WHAT WOULD YOU SAY IS THE INTEREST TO THIS PLACE? WHAT'S SPECIAL ABOUT THIS PLACE? It seems to be a kind of a recreational, relaxed ... not energetic - looks more relaxed. I'd say it's kind of combination recreational and relaxation area that I'm getting out of it. That would be the general character of it. Two aspects - one is aesthetics and the other is a kind of a mild recre- ational area. There seem to be some unique features - I don't have it totally into context as yet. There's a number of things that I've rejected - looked at and rejected saying. First, I got the impression that it was kind of like a miniature golf course -- I rejected that, Merely from saying it -.I didn't reject the principle - I just rejected saying it. Then I kind of got the idea of a standard golf course - I also rejected that on the same principle, so I'm just trying to describe the terrain. Seems expansive - doesn't seem cluttered. Just got a flash of something that reminded me of the gyroscope - gimbals oti the gyroscope. Drinking fountain - looks like it's made out of kinda like field stone built-, up into a fountain ... bo%vl. I'm going to elevate again and go through a search quadrant again. 6 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 I still g-et them in that general location, so that seems to set all right. Distance maybe a mile, mile and a half. Doesn't seem much farther- seems fairly close, The area has an awful lot of grass, lot of trees - looks like dirt walk- ways, well trimmed. I can see the arbor, and the arbor could be a place to sit and be out of the clirect sun. May be a few little tables and benches and chairs in there. That outlooks over quite a grassy area - there are quite a few trees. I see basically an oak. Right after they got out of the car I could see some eucalyptus buds and branches on the ground, and it seemed like the trees were there. Looked like they got out of the car, stepped upon a curb, dirt parkway, a sidewalk, and then they went into this area. I get the feeling this windmill type thing - that all seems fairly real. The feeling is still that it's relaxing and has some recreational aspects I just haven't put it totally together as to giving it a name. Right now I get a very strong impression of flowers again. It seems like right now they're back to right where I originally spotted them only they're going in the opposite direction - like they're moving toward the direction they originally went. While they were there they walked on several pathways - walked Out quite a ways, then swung over and come over and worked around and looked at ... One peculiar thing I might note - so far I haven't sensed, seen nor heard tD an airplane. Cars seem quite distant outside of that little motor scooter affair with the two guys on it. That's about the only vehicular traffic I've seen - except out in the parking lot. It seems like to me that they've got most of their attention off what they were looking at and they've got their attention more on the car now. 7 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 I want. to took and find Out what the significant thing was that Bart was talking about. There,' s some- thing quite unUsual there, and I Da rilned if I can pick it U 1). WAS HAL DOING ANYTHING BESIDES WALKING ALONG WAS THERE ANY ACTIVITY FOR HAL TO DO? Most of the time I was looking at Hal,he was kind of listening to Bart and Bart was pointing out a number of things. Part of the time Bart was walking with Hal; part of the time he was back by Judy. When I first saw them, it was Bart in the front on the left side, Hal was on his right, Judy was slightly behind - almost between Bart and HaL but bohind, and Phyllis to her right. They wandered around but the first time I picked tip - they were that way. When they were coming back, they just about reversed. Bart would be in front. When they were coming back, it looked like Bart was in front with Phyllis, and Judy was walking more behind Bart and Hal on her right when they were coming back out of there. They're actually at the car 2:30 SHALL WE GO DOWNSTAIRS AND SEE HOW THEY'RE DOING? 8 Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 P,.,-,,,,p!App,7%ve#Fon Release 2003/09/10: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 I Y 13, Vol, 14. A o. 2. _@-3 1,N A study of sine-wave contrast sensitivity by two psychophysical niethods* CPYRGHT D. YI. KELLYand R. E. SAVOIE Stanj6rd Research Institure. Jlenlo Park. Cali.fonffa 94025 CPYRGH T Measurements of the contrast threshold for a sinusoidal grating as a function of its spatial frequency 0 have been used to study the effects on the visual process of optical, neural, chromatic, temporal, and other factors. Van N-leeteren (1966) has reviewed a number of these studies. We are particularly interested in the low-frequency region of such data, below about I- cvcles/de- (cpd), because the. monotonic increase of contrast serisitivitv with increasing spatial frequency in this region may represent a simple form of lateral inhibition (Kelly, 1973). In certain cases, little or no tow-frequency falloff was reported (e.g., Westheirner, 1960- Campbell & Green, 1965), but this has been attributed to the use of small, sharp-ed-ed targets (Davidson', 19W KcHy, 1970) or 0 flash presentations (Kelly, 1971, 1973), wl-Lich are unsuitable for isolating the steady-state response to very low spatial frequencies. However, sorne Ss report tj @ lat. die task of detecting a low-frequency -rating seems C 0 different from the high-frequency detection task-, this raises the question of whether the apparent inhibition would persist at low frequencies if criterion effects were eliminated. Many of the data in the litmiture have been obtained by the psychophysical method of adjustments. which is the ea@iest and fastest procedure when Ss are experienced in this type ofjudgiiient@ variations of the method of limits have also been used. But more sophisticated psychophysical methods have been developed in recent years which are essentially independent of threshold criterion: theso have not been *Our work %vas partIN supported b% NIII Grant No. NS-08322 and NSI Grant No. GB-I 1-571. Sume of' the data were reported at tile October 1971 ineeting of (lie Optical Soci,!tv ofAlnerica in Oluma. Canada. We thank T. '@. CornsN%cei for sm-'Lesting this study. III tile literature oil visual contrast thresholds for sine wave gratings. little attention has been paid to tile psychophysical inethods used to obtain these spatial-frequency response @unes. Here @ve report a comparison Of Such data Obtained by mo qviite different psychophysical methods, but otherwise under identical conditions. using five Ss. Both experiments \k-cre run b 'v computer: (1) In the method of adjustments, the computer program rilerely controls tile order of the stimuli and records S's contrast settings. (2) In tile forced-choice staircase (FCS) technique. tile program determines ho%N often S call discriminate tile SiIIUSOidal 2rating from a uniform field. informs S of his iccuracv. control@ the StilnUILIS contrast oil the basis of S's preceding responses, and brackets his threshold bv a series of successive approximations. NIcthod 2 eliminates criterion effects that occur in Method 1, and hence tends to minimize individual differences. HUNCYCT, tile FCS technique requires an order of magnitude more observing time to obtain equall 'v smooth contrast sensitivity curves. 17CS ,ilso increases tile overall sensitivity of some Ss by as Much as five times. but it does not significantly change the shape of tile contrast sensitivity curve; both methods show strong effects of lateral inhibition at lo%v spatial frequencies. applied to the measurement of sine wave contrast thresholds. We therefore undertook to compare the sine wave thresholds obtained by the method of adjustments with those obtained by a forced-choice staircase (FICS) paradigm, in -which the S was always informed of the correctness of his choice. Our main purpose was to find out whether the [ow-frequency inhibition was independent of criterion effects. but our results are also relevant to other sine wave contrast experiments that use subjective judgments. METHODS Tile st Iimk .ilating. appIaratus is described in detail elsewhere (Kell%. 1966. 1971.); its components are shown schematical-ly in Fig. i. S is seated comfortably. vic%%ing a cathode ray tube CRT) 50 cm distant through an artificial pupil. 2.3 mm in diam. He sees an 8-deg circular field, filled by a vertical sinusoicial grating The spatial frequency of this grating is controlled by a (LINC 8) computer. The dep-mclent @ariable is the Michelson contrast (m) of the grating. detmed as 13max - I@min Bmax + Dmin where 13inax and Binin are the maximurn and minimum %allies of tile stimulus %%aveform. in trolands (td) of retinal illuminance. This contrast i\ under tile control of either tile computer or the S, depending oil the mode of operation. Since the grating does not flash or flicker in the present cxperlment@. Our telliporal va\eform source \@as not used (see Fig. 1). Adjustments Mode In the method of adjustments, die S controls tile contrast of the gratin,_,. using a 2ea_red-do\vli potentiometer \\ itlif)Llt Stops or othcr inechanicat CuCl. Spinning tile knob about t,200 deg covers the entire adjustment range, NOlich Ilia% be either 0-1 or 0-0.1 contrast, depending On a controlled b\ file S. Anothcr @\kit,:h give@ hin, tile Option Of vie%%ing ero or fill[ COWNNt at aIIX Imie. %%ithout losing hi, potenflowQzcr setting. \\11ell III(, '01tinL meet@ his thr,@shold criterion. h,@ ruslics a Approved For Release 2003/09/10 CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 CPYRGHT _,14 ,@J 0 sus.." %G - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- "@IAL I I'll , -,P A PAT'!RN CRY i.: @ coy" EA U C@YSTAL CIC, BLAN@I%G A\' . @NC VU., I'll ATT L i P@E 11 L PEOESTAL sC,PC1 I IWI - W METHOD OF ADJUSTMENT Y -,@ t, E 4 1, 7E ,J --@i SUBACT _- LC-01CE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - H(',AtZCNTAL I km VER ICAL 1 Y14,11 L-%C a S@ATIAL PA7TER*1 CRT E 61F FIVULT11LI @@'6'TRAT I ANK N. N @y ATIF%IJAToq :@N' 4A,! I PENSTAL !W FORCE L).CHOICE STAIRCASE ME THOD Fig. 1. Signal-flow diagrams of the CRT stimulator. (a) Configuration for method of adjustments. (b) Configuration for forced-choice staircase (FCS) procedure. button which enters this contrast into the computer. He is instructed to fixate the center of the grating and to find the contrast at which it can just be discriminated from a uniform field. (This criterion. which we always use for sine wave thresholds. should come close to matching S's performance in the forced-choice task described below.) S spends as much time as lie wishes "huntirtz" back and forth to find his threshold. but we instruct him to make his final judgments only in the stcad@ state: i.e.. after be has refrained from chan2ing the contrast for several seconds. Twelve spatial frequencies were tested in one experimental session; each pattern was presented five times in random order, for a total of 60 judgments. The means of these five settings gave fairly smooth 'spatial-frequenc,. response curves. as described beloW. An experienced S can complete such a run in 20-25 min. Forced-Choice Staircase (FCS) Made Our criterionless psychophysical procedure combined the staircase method Of ordering stimuli 036kLsy. 1947; Cornsweet. 1962) with the forced-choice niethod of response collection flilackwell. 1946; Heincriann, 1961). In this application. the two techniques complement each other in such a way that S spends most of his time making discriminations near threshold, The S's task is much simpler in the FCS made. The same 12 StinlUlUS patterns are used. but their tiontrast is now under the control of' the computer. One stinlUILIS Q'CIC COIISMS 01, two succe@sivc intervals. each 5 sec long: a pattern of nonzero contrast is presented in oril ,v one of thew intervak. \%hich is delertnined by the CODIPUter froin a table at" random nunibcr@. innini-, at' each intervaL a inarker i One second after the bcL lot C sounds to notifv S that the @tiniulus ma@ be visible. fie makes his choice ofintcr@al by pushing a button. vhich iko starts the nc\1 trial@ but this button has no effect until after the second toile. In other @@ords, S must make a choice in order to start a ncx@ trial. but lie cannot do so until after the wcond interval has started. As soon as lie makes his choice, lie bears a pleasant toile (different from the marker toile ) it' lie is correct or an unpleasant e is not. noise if h - other control is a -pause- sMtcli. Miich interrupts His onk the experiment for rest periods. S may use this sMtch also to abort a aiven trial (if. for example, lie' happened to be looking away wilen the marker toile sounded). The aborted trial [:,s repeated when the pause switch is reset, but the s -timulus \,,ill not necessarily occur in the same interval. In older to avoid transient effects (KcUy. 1971. 1973), as we do in the adjustments made. the temporal waveform of the I-CS stimulus is carefully controlled. The mean luminance of the CRT screen is held constant throughout the e\perinient. When a given pattern is presented, its contrast is snioothl@ "faded in" from zero to whatever value is set by the computer. as shown in Fig. 2a. The temporal envelope of the fade-in waveform resembles a lialf-cvcle of a 0.5-lfz cosine wave. so that the full contrast of the pattern is present after I sec (this contrast ah%ays beirw zero in either the first or second interval. at random). The pattern is also faded out the same way. All 12 staircases are independent and randomly interleaved. which helps to eliminate subjective bias effects (Cornsweet. 1962). Oil each trial. the contrast of the UCS stimulus is contingent on the correctness of the preceding responses to the - - same pattern. according to an algorithm described in detail in the Appendix. When the responses indicate that S can detect the pattern. the contrast is decreased; when lie cannot. the contrast is increased. by a constant logarithmic increment in either case. Thus, the contrast is forced to cross and recross the threshold level (which is about 75% correct). At first. the size of the increment is decreased each tirne the response sequence indicates that a contrast increase has probably crossed S's threshold. But the third time this indication occurs. the smallest increment (3V, contrast change) is maintained and the staircase is tenninated with a fixed number of additional trials. A typical staircase illustrating these properties is shown in Fig. 2b. Each stimulus is first presented at full contra@t. to familiarize S with its appearance and to provide a suprathreshold baseline. If he detects it correctly. its next presentation is at a contrast of 0.02: the staircase then enters the main algorithm (see Appendix). to 01 00, To T S-11f 0001 'IV[" 0 4 1 Io I 10 n TIME 7@@Ak NI,VRE4 M-,, 7-, C1,- i,, A...... -,,,., C--. 'd I, C-I.." A '-.0- W FOACED-CHOICE PRESENTATION CYCLE W TYPICAL STAIRCASE Fig. 2. Details of the I-CS procedure. (a) Temporal waveform of one stimulus cycle and timing of alerting tones. (b) A single staircase. reassembled to sho\% all contrasts presented. increment sizes, %%rong responses, and calculated threshold. Approved For Release 2003/09/10 CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 CPYRGHT _2SITIVITY Approved For Release 2003/09/10: CIA-RDIP96407-871400MIDDOO&L 15 Sck cral I iti n d rc dtrials are re(t u i red i k) t c rm i n a t e all I ,i a i rca %c s : a it ex pe rinien ta I Session LISUdll " 65-75 1111ill. re.ardless of' tile skill or experience of' tile S. Most of tile @ari:ibility in length of' tile indikiduil stajrca@es (Rose et @il, 1970) is averw-,ed Out bv the larLe number of' t@iircaws beinu nin simultaneously., Tile threshold for each pattern is calculatcd 2s the nican of file la@t eit'lit contrasts presented, no adjacent I-)air of' these be int, w1mrated bv Illore than the smallest increment. -File intersession ariabilit@ of FCS data obtained in this %N a% is no Lreater than in the adju stnient mode. but is inainly randoin rather than s@'steniatic. Thus, to obtain equally smooth @pat ial-freq tic nc%l response curves, one must average the dita from three FCS sessions. as described below. RESULTS Fi-ure 3 shows some contrast sensitivity data obtained with a 20-year-old emmetropic naive S. The upper curve (Filled circles) represents combined data from three FCS runs; three comparable adjustment curves are plotted separately (open circles). These data are typical of our results in three ways. First, the Shape of the FCS curve is essentially tile same as that Of tile adjustment curves; in both cases. the contrast sensitivity increases steeply at low spatial frequencies, to a MaXirnUln near 4 cpd. Second, the FCS sensitivity is svsternaticatly areater than that in any of tile adjustment runs. by a factor of _2 to 5. Third. there are also sN,steinatic differences among the individua[ adjustment -1 curves. but these are smaller than the FCS-adjLlStment differences. Tile lowest sensitivity in Fig. 3 represents tile first 0.002 Subi. KS 0.005 0.01 0.02 < cc 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 FCS Adjustments 1sl Run 2nd Ron 3rd Run 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 SPATIAL FREQUENCY (cpd) Fig. 3. Contrast sensitivity vs sratial frequency for S K.S. Retinal illuminance. 1,300 ( Id: ar(il'icial pupil. 2. Inill. Filled circles are tile nicans of three FCS run.%. Open circles retiresent three successive adjUS11-11011t runs. 0.005 0.01 V) < 0.02 cc 2 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 S,,bi. GK --o- Adjustments 0.2 0.5 1 2 .5 10 SPATIAL FREQUENCY (cpd) Fig. 4. Contrast sensitivity vs spatial frequency for S D.K. Same conditions as Fig, 3. experiment with S K.S. Her adjustment sensitivity increased subsequently, but leveled off between th'e second and third adjustment runs. Typically, a naive S starts with a high threshold criterion. whi'ch fie then I lowers after some experience with the method of adjustments. However. his adjustment thresholds seldom Ce C6 t as low as his FCS thresholds-. apparently lie adopts a criterion in the range of 90%-100% probability of detection (compared to the 75% imposed by the FCS mode). Fi-ure 4 shows a sinlilar comparison for another S. t S D.K. (one of the authors) is somewhat atypical, having had hundreds of hours of practice in experiments with this particular apparatus. If practice lowers the adjustment threshold, his adjustment sensitivity should be greater than that of S K.S.@ and it is. relative to Ns FCS sensitivity. His adjustment sensitivity may still be slightly less than his FCS sensitivity. but tile' two ire much closer together than they are for Our other Ss. Evidently lie uses a lower threshold criterion. closer to the FCS level. As in Fig. 3@ tile FCS Curve in Fig. 4 was obtained by averaging data frorn three sessions. a-total of about 3.5 li observin- time. However, the co'ntrast sensitivitv curves obtained from individual FCS sessions are also instructive: these are shown for a third S in Fig. 5. Each of tile dashed 0 curves in this figure connects tile end points of the t 2 staircases obtained in a single experimental session (see Fio. 'b). The mean curve for these three FCS sessions is Shown for comparison with tile previous filMlleS. Fil_'Urc 5 list) shows some SvSteniatic variatiOll thlee adjustment rulls for this S. (S H.P. V"'IS Mole expciienced than K.S.. but everl in experienced S @@ill nol: :11%\a% S hold the Sallie adjustillelit Criterion fionl 011C itin to the ncxt.) the FCS sensiiivit\ is abow tivo Approved For Release 2003109110 : CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 kELLY NND S-\V01E Approved For Release 2003/09110 CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 0.002 0.005 0.01 < 0.02 cc F 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Subl. HP FC-' Adjustnienis 1st Run 2nd Run 3fd Run 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 -SPATIAL FREQUENCY (cpd) Fig.5. Contrast sensitivity vs spatial frequency for S H.P. Same conditions as Figs. 3 and 4. Dashed lines show data from diree FCS runs, averaged to obtain fil-led-circle points. times areater than the adjustment sensitivity. The most important result shown in Fig. 5 is the nature of the variability among FCS runs and among adjustments runs. Althouoh the FCS data are about as variable as the adjustment data, the adjustment variabilitv is mainiv svstematic, white the variability aniona the FCS runs seems random. (Note that the FCS curves from individual sessions cross and recross each other and the mean curve several times.) The data were subjected to a chi-square test of the hypothesis that mean rank contrast sensitivity is independent of session number. This hypothesis can be rejected for the adjustments data (p < .00 1), but cannot be rejected for the FICS data (p = A). Now, if the FCS method eliminates systematic intra-S variability from one run to the next, and if this intersession variability is caused mainly by changes in S's criterion, then we would expect this method to minimize the variability among Ss as well. The data shown ini Fig. 6 tend to confirm this expectation. Here the mean FCS Curve for S H.P. is repeated, together with similar data for two other young. emmetropic Ss. Note the close similarity among all three contrast sensitivity curves, particularly at frequencies below 2 cpd. These data (and others not reported here) all tend to confirm tile presence of a low-frequency inhibiting effect with a relatively steep-stope (about _2 in log-log coordinates), DISCUSSION Instructing S to try to detect aiiy pCrTUl b3tiOn Of tile uniform field may be important in niaking tile adjUSInlelll :Lll%'CS SO Shnihi ill S11,1pe [0 tile KS :Lllkcs@ One should not assume that Our result.@ wotilki J)c obtained it' S were instructed to defect tile presence of' a orating, or to report its orientation. count its etc. L allue The use of' ot lie r SUbjec I i ve Cl 1 [01 id cd 11 dOLIh t [Q\S ch, the shape of' the shie wave threshold curvk@, Wh .en rninimuni threshold values are not rekli.lil0d. Jild occasional criterion differences jinon,2 and Mihin Ss :in be tolerated. tile method of' adjustments is ob%iOLlSl\ preferable. because it vields equally SIT100th CLU'Ves Ill about a 1011i of the it tit e required by tile FCS method.' However, the FCS niethod eliminates criterion differences and provides inforination about S'S performance (not just hiSjUd-111CIIIS). Summarizing Our results with five Ss. rinuini-, from 0 naive to quite experienced: (1) Both methods Nield tile same curve shape, but the FCS method -ives significantly greater sensitivity that) that obtained by the method of adjustments: the increase rnaN be as great as a factor of 5 (depending on S's adjustment criterion). 0 (2) Presumably because it is independent of threshold criteria. the FCS method does not show systematic chances of sensitivitv from one run to the next (as the C rnethod of adjustments sometimes does. ) (3) The variability of the FCS data is main[)- random and can therefore be made quite small by taking enough data, (4) When this is done. individual differences (aniong young, emmetropic Ss) tend to disappear. These results are essentially what would be expected. based on the di fferences between the two psychophysical methods. We conclude that. if the S is appropriately instructed, @ic shape of his sine wave grating sensitivity curve is not affected by using the method of adjustments. Moreover ` it seems likely that this negative result woutd be maintained if the present study were extended to other crit e rion-de pendent 0.002 0.005 6 0.01 cc 0 0.02 U 0.05 0.1 Fig. 6. Contrast Sensitivity vs spatial frequency for three young, eninietropic Ss. obtain'ed b@ (lie FCS teclinique. Approved For Release 2003/09/10: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO0700100004-2 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 SPATIAL FREQUENCY (cpd) CPYRGH.T Approved For Release 2003/09/10 : CIA-RDP~r.k,-P9%T~V7FPPR7~qP.'\PP9Pi-~-r[V[-F~' SEOCI I'M EXECUTIVE STAIRCASE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTErFACE F CONTROL RESP13"S E EEF a a C I %I E T 3 STAIRCASE Et Y V;RR CONTROL Y SEQUE'.CES YET' L.%ST .14 S H .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I--" RESPONSE WA HISTORY "AS % PRESENT PESPD%SE S"' ,S,0,SC RIGHT' RIG Yo , A" % VAS LAST FIESPWISE