1091io: CIA-RDP96-00787ROO07001JO004-1
Approved For Release 2003
SECRET
17 October 73
'47MO FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT Proposal for Paranormal Research at SRI
1. On 16 October 73 of OTIS briefed and me on a proposal which
S G =1 E=
(as a consequence of a specific OTS request) SRI had just submitted for a new, one year
3 G program of paranormal research. The proposal (attached) calls, essentially, for a ccn@in-
uation of their 'coordinates' work with SWANN and PRICE, their 'sealed envelopes I work
with GELLER and their EEG studies with 'normal' subjects to determine whether there are
subliminal correlations with remote stimuli; most of the attached proposal consisrs a--' a
rehash of their earlier work--with the substance of the new proposal being contained in
pages 40-44 of the larger document. The price tag is 149K.
2. On 17 October = =1 called me to state that, largely in response to D/C--S'
SGI I desire to ensure that someone is doing something in the paranormal field and to use the
SRI proposal as a test case to spark a management decision, they are going to start pacer-
work in support of the SRI proposal. He also said that his bass, C/CTS/Develcumn-nt &
Engineering is going to forward the proposal to D/OTS with the recom-
SGII mendation that OTS and ORD be jointly in charge of the program and split the costs. 1
toldE = that I had both practical and philosophic reservations on that scare (see
SGI I pars. 3) but that I would undertake to acquaint ORD management with these developments so
that they could be prepared to respond when the proposal is officially surfaced.
3. With reference to my 26 September 73 memo on this topic, my primary objectf_ons
to this proposal are: it would be a continuation of the same undisciplined approach which
has given us so much trouble in the past, with no well-defined research goals, no internal
focal-point of authority and control, little control over the contnactor;s efforts and
almost certainly equivocal results; an objective management decision should come flrst and,
if positive, the effort should be a serious one--selecting the best (not merely an op,,ortunel
vehicle for the postulated goals and handled in a highly secure, need-to-know fashion. I
do not question the SRI investigators' motivation at all and I do feel that their work has
been interesting and very possibly of some real value--but there is some doubt as to the
soundness of some of their uiuthodologies and, in any case, the controversy surrcuniin.- thcm
and their subjects Still has a 'flapl potential which would unnecessarily preoccu,,-y aqd
distract us even if the DCI gave his approval (which is doubtful at bcst). SUls _efforts
could be Supported on a sub-contract basis by whatcver vehicle we mi,,ht chose for tlle
OVCrall CffOrt--10@1Vit-Ig US SOCUI-ely Out Of the Picture.
-c-C
-fz_
SGI I b.
SGI I Approved For Release 2003/09110: CIA-RDPgra-00787ROO07
SGI I