Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96=00788 R001500090010-7 TAB ARMY review(s) completed. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 20O4 9 ? EIS-- DP9 -00788 R001500090010-7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED S7 ATES ARMY INTELLICt NCE AND SECURITY COMMAND ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARL..INGTON. VIRGINIA 22212 i PtY TO P.'ST#KYtcv' OF MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF FOR INTELLIGENCE SUB J.ECT: INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (U) 17 July 1984 1. (t3) We have completed a review of project CENTER LANE with a focus on resources I.nvolved, results obtained and the role of INSCOM in this area. 2. (S) INSCOM has invested considerable effort over a long period of time to dove:lnp the remote viewing technology. -As a result thL Army enjoys a :conopely on = his revolutionary concept for intelligence collection. We must !sure that ve do not lose this knowledge and experience in any action taken to cha.r,i'e INSC&?M's .roNe in the use and development of the t cdznology. :. (s) T em concerned about tbusc three aspects of the program. a. Oontinuedresearch and development. We cannot abandon the work already clone:e `_f.or. nca other I?cason than to keep pace with the effort being expended by our adversaries. b. C"vr.ent operations. Tntel.lig nce users in the Army, lIlA, NSA and CIA have a.ll tasked this methodology to augment established disciplines and for missions that would be extremely difficult or Impractical for any other collection resource. The Intelligence Community cannot afford the loss of this capability while it waits for a total refinement and understanding of the observed phenomenon. Peoplleinvolved. Chap Ong 1NSCOM`s role affects the dedicated personnel involved. We must insure the timely and fair reassignment of our excellent cadre who, ray or may not wish or be able to participate in some further continuation of the pr..oram. 4. S) In spite of these concerns it is my opinion that INSCOM, who has nuppor.t.ed this project with S and 1A funds and personnel assigned without npacc.s, should discontinue our involvement with psychoenergetic research and operations. To mitigate adverse impact in the areas of concern expressed above I intend to cease INSCOM CENTER LANE Project operations on 30 Sept 1984, but allow completion of outstanding contracts and training by 31 December 1984. This would: VERIFIED ACCESS TO CATEGORY THlid d (3} ~ ' '. 'c C(IT,Y OF -- COPIES ARMY review(S~FR Igdor Relead 2b0 * :1C P96-00788 R001500090010-7 SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED NOT RELEASAF;LE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2/r? :-P 7.1 q~ IACG SUBJECT: INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (U) 17 July 1984 (U) All.oc. the reassignmexit of ICLP personnel on an equitable basis' h. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Permit trainees to complete training and become 60% operational. c.. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Permit timely and unlisrupted transfer of (1) ICLP operations to a national agency such as DIA or NSA and (2) ICLP phenomena valid=ation and technology extension to the US Ai:n:ly Medical Research and Development Command. d. (U) Permit preparation of comprehensive after action reports, thereby preserving vital institutional. knowledge and technical details that would otherwise be permanently lost, 5. (U) Accordingly, I request that: a. OACSI coordinate this action to insure that there is no objection at Department of Army? b. INSCOM be authorized to coordinate dir Medical R&D Command with regard to para. 4c. E. SOY9It'ER Brit Mier Ccnex'a:tl. , tir Commanding i 788R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2094/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96=00788 R001500090010-7 TAB Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 DAMI-ISH M ?ORA:NDUM TURU VICE CHIEF OF STAFF, AR ARMY Vi FOR SECRETARY Of THE A.FMY SULTECT. CENTER LANE (U)--AC?41'1ON MWMANT, AUG 4 1. (S/ C"L-1 /NO.kORN) Purpose. TQ obtain your appro for ithe discontinuation of Intelligence and Security G rtmanc (I SCOM) involvement with p-sychoenergetic research a.nd operations, 2. (U) Discussion: a. (S/CL-1 /NOFORN) CENTER LANE is an. INSCOM4 Special Access Program which utilizes an aspect of parapsychology known as Remote Viewing (RV as the col 1. ect iorl for obtaining in- formation of intelligence interest, Yo,-our approval for the Auny to engage in' CENTER LANE activities most roc.ently obtained on 1 Sep 83. b. (S / Q, 1 /NOF?ORN) CDt1 INS COM ha : reviewer! the project and cea.ched the decision to d i se-ont:inue pl> co nm -}did ` a involvement with psycho ner etic research -ind c pt?r.rt ions.n Recognizing that :NNSCOM has itkvcstcd consider.a ile effor ' c'vcr bong pericce, of time to develop the }V technoio y and told onopoly on this evolutionary conccpt for 14itei I a.r,ence ,oa.::.^r tioc& he desirov. that we not lose this knowledge and ex POT ie nce. C . (U) Pis SL!I ,Fl COM at't :L'4'P: r t(; r i) trig (1) tip/ CL-I /N0F0RN) Cease C t:tt71 _? LANE ,pet-atic)ns on 30 Sep 84, but z-a 1. l o ; contracts rind trail , .,g to cornt t a-1u,-, to 31 Dec. 8 4 (S, CL_3/NOYopN) Tr, 'er project operational aspects to DIA. and technology ex ten.,: ion to the US Army Medical Research and Development 'Cowritancl. In th' event- DIA is not. i.nterrste(d in the transfer, NSA will he on;irie'cd. CLOSE HOLD/H, Approved For Release 2004/07J;Q"~,C 1 96-00788 R001500090010-7 C)FP l,TrAENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF ThE A.CSlSTfr, T :: IWF OF EYArr roil INTgE>&-LIGENCA: ; R :6+16NC&'CC14+1, CSC, E0510 R SANE C!r SS1A'LE.g BY CC TNSC0M O OADR !RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 I iFLEkS L T NATIMI F,, Approved For Release 20041 DAM SUBJ CT: CENTER LANE (U j.w .,'"[ I lr1 MEMORANDUM d . f / Ca., I /NOFORN) I t I pa t. ed that d i sca.a ion between iNs CC M and rl~t_ al~.: ~- +:r r g~ ttt i eft E i rt 5 wa t:su . t t 4 Itettcora.t1dtzra i) -.,,t.eeme.nt tr-trisNNt ici all LANE r a O 1, while Br-~ .zt st?E~. t? .r Ys i r'ch as c. o e z ti.c, a c pabit itsaes j).'E'. protected n nd thi: oec`p1_e n\/oiv0d IE: C?ta si ne+ on an (S'ICL-a/i3 )kti It. as a~:o !, c E cr tat'y of the e t?ttt ' aipi,'ovt t:hp INSf..1)R _oncCF',''t f 1~7 ded fc~r' ; ~jteca by the AC. I prior to Iin al.en,cn- c a t i on . 4. (S/CL-1/NUFOPN) The CENTER LANE Special Access Program (SAP) should be rran 3f ^rrcd ; as appropriate, once i SCON involvcme,nt: is discoiatitatuc:d. a. (S ; ' CL-3 / N I C ) K ' a ` J. J- h .: c c R D C;1, rnrir.f l? d h e c otti e s i.ravolved and r'r < z d .?~^. r' ;~ cj : F?c t ion , + t' c zit?r1 PC t it maw sii7oul d be changed and I'i S t"E l r' of ! i!(' Ar y !1ti1:1 riac led ). (5/ CL- 2 14 Fa I?r`1) J '9 eon- t'\nny rtiyenc a: .:3i1mes the pr(-,-. ject functions i the S;'F desires If that agency AP ~t ldcc?t:at,i ;rta.l yaar,nc,x.t. f-,- :' sari ir+teriui Period this should be La r.c~~ ieid c? t:*,ac r: a new T}. rriE . i Encl r- A yf for Intciji ft gH21r~1 CLOSE HOLD I r% ro r+, a^rt6-;g !~~?11"~;~~iY t~R ~?39 oYRelease 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 ir,) ri NOa R LE SM.3L TT t, l., ? -rtHrn+ee%Mr ~' Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 TAB Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/0T/09 : G =Pi6-00788ROO1500090010-7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY nr3 ,'Cr or HE. Vi`_~ EANT iuuuMEr OF STAFF FOR INTELL1t kNCC .': A.iFdttsv7O.1, e) 20310 Aywaij" W, BJ CT: Memr tr1 of J ,Leemi nt (U) Trot ma, nc.Ec:er- Uy,f Intel .L igcncj_5 :=;n fit: r.:;r~ i > y Command `.ri.Ln'tor, HaLI Statioll Arlington, VA 22212 i. (S/CL-2/NO ?' 3Ri) Reference ;llri-ior:a: d sm . INS ? , iACC, 26 Sep 84' SUD] x?cr.. MemoL::1ndufn of 1 :`K'rwm t?' , '3: rr.tusfer of aNSCOM 1 ?:v '.' E R it is_N `: ; j k' PIA (Si :.-? - "' / NF O F R N) , (,F a`l.f; C'$mcn l~.MOA) is ;;l.opi'ci`v'E q S,/ rL-2/t~k) M~~fs4V,t Feq vest you con i+ ~r the i_nea.usio o* f some i1. on the pcooedure to be fo,' lowed in tr'ansE!,rr'inq. Aersonnef yE to allow E:itne for DIA t o Ld4 l f j~ c 4- S. Once such spaces l..y.. availably, the detailed person.ne! mar be given a Pet anent change of rt ~.tion. If DIA pies; xes a cli,xige in authorized str~cnt 'L"h to al-low for inmediate PCS reassig rnraent. , theymay apply for It through JCS. OACS1, DA will ='.rpport such a change in ttr~t.us if the 5wibj ect: becon1e~s an issue. > U1A. Ir4sCom trav detail the I ,gt iv dua],s involved for up to one 4ifie,'d by Cdr' -~G`C?P4 NATIONALS Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 TAB Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 20 00788R001500090010-7 US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND CENTER LANE TRAINING AND APPLICATIONS PROCEDURES SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS CLASSIFIED BY: CDR, INSCOM WARNING NOTICE: CENTF'R LANE SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM RESTRICT DISSEMINATION TO THOSE WITH VERIFIED ACCESS TO CATEGORY THREE-(3) Approved For Releas Approved For Releases )f--RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND CENTER LANE TRAINING AND APPLICATIONS PROCEDURES 1. GENERAL 2. DEFINITIONS 3. MILITARY OBJECTIVE 4. MILITARY APPLICATIONS 5. APPROVAL HISTORY 6, SELECTION OF PERSONNEL 7. TRAINING PROCEDURES 8. PSYCHOENERGETIC APPLICATIONS 9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10. CONFIDENTIALITY 1.1. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT PAGE jo O's Approved For Release^2Q)1 07N (1V> f- -RDP96-007888001500090010-7 J'l Approved For Release U S ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND CENTER LANE TRAINING AND APPLICATIONS PROCEDURES I. (S/CL--l/NOFORN) GENERAL: The procedures set forth herein detail the activities of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) Special Access Program (SAP) CENTER LANE in psychoenergetics. These procedures are In effect for the period required to train and apply psychoenergetics. They are effective and do not involve any practices which expose participants to harmful circumstances or substances such as drugs. 2. (S/CL--2/NOFORN) DEFINITIONS: a. (U) Psychoenergetics: A mental process by which an individual. perceives, communicates with, and/or perturbs characteristics of a designated target, person, or event remote in space and/or time from that individual. It does not involve any electronic devices located or focused at the target, nor, does it involve classical photo interpretation of photographs obtained from overhead or oblique means. b. (U) Psychoenergetic Source: A person who perceives, communicates with, andror perturbs characteristics of a designated target, person, or event. c. (U) Psychoenergetic Trainee: A person being trained to be a psychoenergetic source. d. (U) PsychoenergeticSession: A single attempt by a psychoenergetic source and 4n interviewer/monitor to perceive, communicate with, and/or perturb characteristics of a designated target, person, or event. e. (U) Interviewer/Monitor: The individual who interacts directly with -the-psychoenergetic source before, during, and after the session. WARNING NOTICE: CENTER LANE SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM RESTRICT DISSEMINATION TO THOSE WITH VERIFIED ACCESS TO CATEGORY TUREE (3) SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved%For Releqg% 7/09 : CIA-Kb036S-bo 0x15000@bbj0-3 N S C OM ~~,hw r= DECLASSIFY ON: OADR Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIARDP96-00788R001500090010-7 f. (U) Remote Viewing: The name of a method of psychoenergetic perception. A term coined by SRI-International (SRI-I) and defined as "the acquisition and description, by mental means, of information blocked from ordinary perception by distance, shielding, or time." r;. (U) Coordinate Remote Viewing (CRV): A Remote Viewing technique that requires the use of coordinates as targeting information. h. (U) Targeting Information: An abstract referent which represents the target of interest. i. (U) Target/Site: A specific area, person or event at a specific time. j. (U) Discrete State: A typ of psychoene.rgetic activity in which the source perceives his consciousness to he located at the target. 3. (S/CL--2/NOFORN) MILITARY OBJECTIVE: It is the objective of these procedures to maintain the quality of psychoenergetic (:raining and applications so that CENTER LANE will continue to support the broad spectrum of intelligence and counterintelligence requirements in collection, target acquisition, and deception. 4. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) MILITARY APPLICATIONS: CENTER LANE applications of psychoenergetics include but are not limited to: (1) targeting of key enemy military personnel from covert agents to key battle commanders, (2) monitoring hostile military movements, lines of communication, and specific technologies, (3) detecting changes in the state of military units, (4) detecting and assessing hostile intelligence efforts targeted against friendly units/miss`s?ens, and (5) detecting and assessing hostile technological capabilities in specific locations. Since US Army personnel., units, materiel, and operations are subject to a similar hostile intelligence service threat, CENTER LANE can assist in devising countermeasures to eliminate or reduce vulnerabilities. . (S/CL?-2/NOFORN) APPROVAL HISTORY: a. (S/CL-2/NOF"OR.N) Concept Approval: The Commander, US - --- -------- - Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command (DARCOM) approved in principle the US Army Material Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA) involvement in the project GRILL FLAME; which began in April 1,978 (C?'.ILL FLAME was the predecessor to the CENTER LANE Project). In May 1978, the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI) accepted lead responsibility for GRILL FLAME applications. Effective 14 January 1981, by approval of Approved For Release 2004/07/.09.t~ClARQ.E96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 20 CI - 100788 R001500090010-7 PM the Under Secretary of the Army, INSCOM became the only active operational GRILL FLAME element in the Army. Program management for GRILL FLAME was transferred to Commander, INSCOM effective 11 February 1981. OACSI, DAMI-ISH remained the Army focal point for policy matters and interface at the national level, Overall DoD responsibility resided with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). Also in 1981, a joint services GRILL FLAME Committee consisting of DIA, the US Air Force and US Army was formed. Later the Air. Force Chief of Staff directed that the Air Force withdraw from the committee and all psychoenergetic programs. A comprehensive program was designed to determine the operational parameters and usefulness of psychoenergetics and assess the threat these phenomena posed to national security. At that time DIA was R&D oriented and INSCOM's GRILL FLAME Project was applications oriented. In the.FY83 DoD budget review the Budget Subcommittee of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence curtailed all psychoenergetic activities funded by the Army in the National Foreign Intelligence Program (NFIP), but directed that DIA could complete the third year of their effort and that all future Army funding be budgeted outside the NFIP. INSCOM terminated formal involvement with GRILL FLAME at the end of FY 82; in the fall of 1.982, in keeping with congressional desires, the Commanding General INSCOM provided funding from Security and Investigative Activities (S&IA) monies, and continued its efforts under a provisional compartmented SAP nicknamed CENTER LANE. On 1 September 1983, the Secretary of the Army approved continued Army participation in CENTER LANE activities within INSCOM and with appropriate contractors in a cooperative effort with DIA. N b. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Human Use Approval: GRILL FLAME was designated a "Human Use' program as the result of an Army General Counsel decision in February 1979, which determined that the Project involved "Experimentation on Human Subjects," and that relevant Human Use protocols did indeed apply to Project procedures and technologies. Conduct of the Project under Human Use regulations was first approved in April 1980 by the Under Secretary of the Army. Appendix A contains an historical summary of the Human Use issue, as well as a list of the pertinent regulations, which govern CENTER LANE activities. 6. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) SELECTION OF PERSONNEL: a. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Current Selection Criteria: After over a. year of participation within the psychoenergetic project, source personnel were tested by the INSCOM Staff Psychologist in an attempt to determine a suitable profile by which fu-rther participants could be identified. The specific tests administered were (see Appendix B for test descriptions): (MMPI). (1) The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory P96-00788R001500090010-7 Approved For ReleaW20(fi4/87I 9 91A T Approved For Release 2004/OZJ0.9 (,#-F QP -00788 R001500090010-7 (2) Gordon Personal Profile -- Inventory (GPI). (3) Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior (FIRO-B). (4) California Psychological Inventory (CPI). Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS). (t1) Personal Orientation Inventory (POI). For the most part, the group presented itself as. emotionally stable with no marked trends. There did appear to be an interesting similarity in defensive style, a tending toward artistic, aesthetic, and cultural interests, and an introversive style of emotional expression. From these test results the INSCOM Staff Psychologist constructed a test that may be used as an. Initial screening tool in the selection of new psychoenergetic participants. This new test is called the INSCOM Factor Questionnaire. This instrument is used to compare individuals with. CENTER LANE sources. A high score suggests that individuals have similar characteristics to operational personnel and may be potential candidates for the project.. A score of 20 or higher is considered to be similar to CENTER LANE personnel. Individuals who score within the parameters specified by the INSCOM psychologist would then receive personal interviews with CENTER LANE Project $ersonnel. From these interviews new project participants would be selected and trained. b. (S/C:L--3/NOFOP.N) Projected Selection Criteria: SRI-I has been contracted to investigate and report on a particular aspect of psychoenergetics relating to operational management of personnel; that is, to determine if a personality testing technique can be created wbich, when applied to a general population, will delineate specific individuals who exhibit a higher degree of talent for psychoenergetic abilities. c. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Voluntary Consent: As required under the regulations governing "Eicsman Use" (see para 2., Appendix A), all personnel operate on a strictly voluntary basis, and may withdraw at any time without any form of prejudicial action or consideration directed against them. Further, participants are informed of any known or potential risks that might; be inherent in program participation. This is accomplished through the use of a verbal briefing from a knowledgeable CENTER LANE official, and the execution of a personalized Statement of Consent form outlining all pertinent information and consideration... The voluntary consent requirement pertains to individuals assigned to the CENTER LANE Project and contractors/consultants.. A sample of the voluntary consent form is attached as Inclosure 5, Appendix A. Approved For Relea""24~/ ~CP96-00788R001500090010-7 Approved For Release :260410 W: 61,k-RC'96-00788ROO1500090010-7 7. (S/CL-1/NOFORN) TRAINING PROCEDURES: To provide a framework for the standardizing of the task of psychoenergetic learning, a number of methodologies are being utilized and conducted within the CENTER LANE Project. These are as follows: a. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Orientation Testing/Training: Purpose: To provide new personnel with an introduction to training and applications procedures. (2) Administered by: CENTER LANE Project personnel.. and selected contractor and subcontractors. (3) Location: Fort George G. Meade, Maryland and other designated locations. (4) Duration: One to six yionths. (5) Description of Procedures: Orientation testing/training is developed from the practical application of state-of--the-art psychoenergetic technology drawn from academic institutions, scientific laboratories, and research establishments around the world. It is an eclectic approach, using those methods which have applications potential. Orientation testing is designed to determine if new personnel have aptitudes which would be of operational value and could be developed through training. This orientation testing consists of a series of controlled. exercises in psychoenergetic functioning. New personnel may be*asked to attempt to perceive, communicate with, and/or perturb characteristics of a designated target, person, or event remote in space and/or time from that individual. Orientation training is composed of practical exercises in Remote Viewing, lectures, literature review, and observation o.f others. It includes the use of locally significant sites, as well more remote geographical locations as targets. A. target pool consists of a controlled group of sites or targets and their associated targeting information. Prior to the beginning of a training session, a target is randomly selected from this target pool. Information available concerning the target is kept from the trainee until after the session. (6) Training Session Preliminaries: Before a first training session is scheduled, the person being trained is oriented fully to the procedure to be followed by the monitor. The trainee is Instructed that be or she should state only raw perceptions, since experience has shown that specific definitions are quite often wrong while initial raw perception tends to be correct. Personnel being trained are always encouraged to express their feelings and ideas for enhancing all aspects of the psychoenergeti.cs collection process. (1) Approved For Release 2004/07/08iRAfED 6-007888001500090010-7 Approved For Release 20047/09': dIA-f 6 00788 R001500090010-7 (7) Training Session Dynamics: During the 30-60 minutes prior to the agreed-upon time of a training session, the monitor offers some encouragement to the trainee in the same manner that a coach might give a pep talk to his team. During the 15 minutes immediately before the session the trainee and monitor are generally silent. Experience has shown (unpublished data) that this quiet time enhances the training process. The training room is homogeneously-colored, acoustic-tiled, and featureless, with light controlled by a dimmer, so that environmental distractions can be minimized? During the entire process the trainee and monitor function as a team. The monitor provides encouragement with words of reassurance that the task is, in fact, possible. At no time is the session conducted by the trainee in the absence of all other persons. If the trainee does not have any immediate sensory impressions, the monitor applies no pressure. Rather, the monitor reassures the trainee that there is no time limit for the training session. If it appears to the monitor that the impressions are in some way contradictory or inconsistent, the monitor may then attempt clarification by asking questions in order to verify what the trainee first describes. All sessions are tape-recorded, and pen and paper are available for the trainee to sketch his or her perceptions. Experience has shown that some trainees prefer to combine written and oral descriptions, while some prefer to work sequentially. The average training session for orientation is approximately 15 minutes of actual perception. Trainees generally are not permitted to go beyond 30 minutes as this leads to perceptual confusion and w eventual loss of the training affect. (8) Post Session Dynamics: After the training session is over, the trainee and monitor obtain specific information. about the target., either in picture descriptive form for remote geographic sites, or--as in the case of local sites--by actually visiting the target site. 'Te. trainee and monitor then discuss the session results. The purpose of this post- session activity is to provide the trainee with the satisfaction of knowing how well he or she did while mental perceptions of the targeted site are still fresh in mind. b. (S/CL?-3/NOFORN) CRV Training: (1) Purpose: To provide trainees with the requisite skills necessary to perform certain psychoenergetic applications. (2) Administered by: Contractor and subcontractor personnel. (3) Location: SRI-I Menlo Park, CA; SRI:--I New York, NY; SRI-I Washington D. C. ; and other mutually agreed locations as required. Approved For Release 2Gl /Q7/o .: Rl P96-00788R001500090010-7 i Approved For Release< (4) Duration: 12 to 18 months. (5) Description of Procedure: CR.V training is a contracted service provided by SRI-I. The training involves lectures on theory coupled with practical exercises and drills. Particularly effective instructional procedures include active participation wherein the trainee interacts with the curriculum materials by responding, practicing, and testing each step of the material to be mastered; information feedback, wherein the trainee finds out with minimal delay whether the response is correct; and individualized instruction, wherein the trainee moves ahead at his or her own rate. The training procedures have been broken down into several stages representing various elements of CRV phenomena. These stages both facilitate training and actually follow the predictable' course of increasing perception which builds itself in specific increments and impact. Stages 1 through 3 appertain to general site features, which become increasingly refined as individual competency with Stage 3 techniques develops, Stage 4 Involves perception of specific site elements, a good portion of which may not be available to any other intelligence techniques, save for actual penetration of the site. Stage 5 allows the trainee In a sense to reverse the procedure and "interrogate" his perceptions, allowing clarification of various specific or subtle features of the site. Stage 6 permits the construction of 3-dimensional models of major site characteristics, with increasing refinements in detail. 'perience and theory extension indicates that additional increments exist beyond Stage 6. Research is underway to develop and define the parameters and potentials of these additional fields. (6) Session Dynamics: In conducting a CRV session, a remote viewer or trainee and a monitor begin by seating themselves at the opposite ends of a table in a special remote viewing room equipped with 'p--per and pens, a tape recorder, and an overhead TV camera which allows either recording for documentation, or monitoring by individuals outside the room. The room is homogeneously-colored, acoustic-tiled, and featureless, with light controlled by a dimmer, so that environmental distractions can be minimized. The session begins when the monitor provides targeting information, in the form of specific site coordinates, to the trainee. For training purposes the monitor is allowed to know enough about the site to enable hi in to determine when accurate versus inaccurate information is being provided. The session then proceeds with the monitor repeating the targeting information at appropriate intervals and providing necessary feedback. The feedback procedure was designed to reinforce the trainee's contact with the site but not to assist him by random cuing. The remote viewer generates verbal responses and sketches, until a coherent Approved For Release 20O4/y07/499; C##4-RDR?6-00788R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004t07/b9 CIAR?M6-00788R001500090010-7 response to the overall task. requirement emerges. The use of the quick reaction-response procedure has been found useful in minimizing imaginative embellishment. (7) Post Session Dynamics: After the training session is over, the trainee and monitor obtain specific information about the target. As in the case of orientation training, this is presented in picture descriptive form for remote geographic sites, or in the case of local sites, may involve actually visiting the target site. The trainee and monitor then discuss the session results, again with the purpose of providing the trainee with the satisfaction of knowing how well he or she did while mental perceptions of the targeted site are still fresh. c.. (S/CL--3/NOFORN) Applications Training: (1) Purpose: To enable advanced trainees to integrate and expand acquired skills for psychoenergeti.c applications. (2) Administered by: CENTER LANE Project personnel. (3) Location: Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. (4) Duration: Continuous. (5) Description of Procedure: Procedures for applications training a.r.e essentially' identical as those previously presented except in the style of target presented. Applications targets are actual targets of military interest, such as US facilities or USSR sites from which data are available or can eventually be obtained. Targets of this type provide a basis for judgements regarding utility, accuracy, calibration., and depth of detail for any given trainee in a real world environment. d. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Advanced Individual Training: (1) Purpose: To provide experienced sources with advanced individual training to meet applications requirements. (2) Administered by: CENTER LANE Project personnel, and selected contractors and subcontractors. (3) Location: Fort Meade, Maryland and various contractor locations. (4) Duration: Continuous. (5) Description of Procedure: Individualized advanced training programs are developed to meet specific applications needs. Such programs may involve training in biofeedback, Approved For Release,;,2004/07409.,; QJk:RQP96-00788R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 200ii0la9 CJI 96. 07888001500090010-7 communications ski, l.ls, perturbation techniques, discrete state, hemi-sync, search, Neuro-linguistic Programming, and alternate target acquisition methods. One program of particular interest is hemi.-.sync training conducted by the Monroe Institute of Applied Sciences (MIAS), Faber, VA: The MIAS hemi--sync techniques are used to teach sources to control highly specialized mental states conducive to psychoenergetic performance. This form of advanced individual training is only used with sources of proven performance and a recognized degree of maturity. Training is accomplished in four essential phases; (1) application of the Monroe "Discovery" series done at Fort Meade to screen personnel and prepare for phase two; (2) Attendance at the MIAS Gateway program for qualified personnel, conducted in a seminar atmosphere; (3) One-on-one training sessions with Robert A. Monroe at MIAS, whic} are designed to "customize" individual techniques for specific individual needs; (4) use of specially designed hemi-sync environments during applications training done at Fort Meade. 8. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) PSYCHOENERGETIC APPLICATIONS: CENTER LANE sources can be used to perform psychoenergeti.c applications in support of intelligence and counterintelligence requirements (see paragraph 3, above), The dynamics of applications sessions parallel those of training sessions. The sequence of events consists of the following: (1) taskin?I;; (2) development of a collection plan; (3) conduct of psychoenergetic session(s); (4) reporting; (5) evaluation. Applications sessions are always conducted under the control and management of CENTER LANE personnel. Sessions may he conducted at Fort Meade or other locations as deemed necessary. PsychoenergetIc consultants/contractors may be employed when required to meet applications requirements. 9. (S/CL--3/NOFORN) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: a. Selected personnel may use the hemi-sync environment in conjunction with psychoenergetic applications/training. h. Sources and trainees may be monitored using appropriate non-intrusive biological monitoring equipment. C. The maximum number of applications sessions for each source will not exceed ten per week. d. The maximum number of training sessions for each-source will not exceed 20 per week. Approved For Release 2004/Q7109?.w,CIAq,6-00788R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 20041071094,: CI"'Q?9 00788R001500090010-7 e. CENTER LANE procedures do not involve the use of drugs, substances, or circumstances harmful to participants. The INSCOM Staff Psychologist provides continuous support to the project. Facilities at Kimbrough Army Hospital, Fort Meade, MD, are available if required. 10. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) CONFIDENTIALITY: individuals performing as psychoenergetic trainees, sources, and monitors under the CENTER LANE Project will not have their roles identified outside of their parent organization without their specific prior consent, and they will be referred to in project reports only by an alpha-numeric designator. Products of CENTER LANE such as tapes, drawings, transcripts, rosters, or other materials which might reveal the identity of the source will be coded to assure the protection of their identity. ii. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) PHYSTCAL ENVIRONMENTt Psychoenergetic sessions will be conducted in an ordinary room at ambient temperature and humidity during the normal waking hours of the participants. The only limitations on these parameters will be for security from electronic eavesdropping and elimination of ordinary distractions, such as radio, office machinery, and outside noises. Approved For Release 2004407109 ? C 96-00788R001500090010-7 Approved For Release%ann 0 REDf6-OO788ROO15OOO9OO1O-7 US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND CENTER LANE TRAINING AND APPLICATIONS PROCEDURES Historical Summary of "Human Use" Issue WARNING NOTICE: CENTER LANE SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM RESTRICT DISSEMINATION TO THOSE WITH VERIFIED ACCESS TO CATEGORY TWO (2) CLASSIFIED BY: CDR, INSCOM DECLASSIFY ON: OADR Approved For Release 04109 9'96-00788ROO 1500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/9094'1 r : Historical Summary of "Human Use" Issue 1. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) In February 1979, the Army General Counsel FOIAB5 determined that GRILL FLAME activities involved testing on human ARMY subjects, 1 in M a r c h i 9, The. Surgeon General's Human Subjects Research Review Board reviewed the GRILL FLAME protocol and concluded that it. represented technology transfer and validation of the technology transfer, rather than research or clinical investigation, and as such, GRILL FLAME activities did not require approval for human use. However, the Board expressed concerns that future Army follow-on work might be classified as research, and as such, plans should be considered to establish credible human use review procedures to oversee GRILL FLAME activities. In April 1979, Army General Counsel determined. that the Army could continue/proceed with GRILL FLAME activities as long as HEW guidelines and other appropriate precautionary measures were taken. In April. 1980, the Under Secretary of the Army approved the continuation of GRILL FLAME activities. In October 1980, the DoD, DIA, and Army General Counsel jointly agreed that it would be prudent to obtain written approval from the Deputy Secretary of Defense to conduct GRILL FLAME activities. ACSI,,'DA concurrently initiated action to obtain Secretary of the Army approval to conduct GRILL FLAME activities, In September "1982, INSCOM GRILL FLAME activities ceased because of NFIP restrictions; INSCOM psychoenergetic activities were reinitiated in December 1982, under the TNSCOM CENTER LANE Project (ICLP), an S&TA activity. Secretary or Under Secretary approval. for GRILL FLAME/I.CLP activities has been granted. on 14 January 1981, 1 February 1982 and 1. September 1983. App-rQvals are generally valid for one year. 2. (U) Regulations governing "Experimentation on Human Subjects" are as follows: a. (U) 45 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46, "Protection of Human Subjects" (Incl 1). b. (U) Procedure 13, DOD Directive 5240.1--R (Incl 2). c. (U) AR 381-10, paragraph 2-18 (Incl 3). d. (U) USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3, "Boards, Commissions and Committees: HIGH PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURES" (Intl 4). Approved For Release 2004/07/0A9s:] CIA-RDP9~-A0,788IQ, 0. 1,500 90010-7 t.2 ~ - I Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 i 3~'y a as mrs 4 %' ; .)ERAL R ULAMI-,; S i to .~ 1r rY 8~ 13 8 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 ` dpi.= `9. 'AUR.is? wn. A r .~ ?.u}Yil?.', 1. ;;.roved ....... , "? ,~ pp For Release 2004/07/09 CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 A1'' HESEA(:11CH ACT [.,nktyS: k" 9t 5)"it;Ei>tt'b+. t= t'im~.)c, u4 j, { 2 , . t: J}.i6: 1 t ! aV of th fitlt i(; 11t altar .t'9 v1 C Act, m t> amcn,h, bV s ttt)r 40:1 of 1 U'i 'u't, is an!Ar"icd by au ding, at the rrd t'te tyt7?lil~vii!C, .~:'t'? it?it:i?ti. i? I a', rit'. I f i4 FtJh9tt)'i. El ill('!, 11111 by regulation ;t yrtlt+ )Wt ':.rclt r rttit*; for any pf0jt..c1 m v, ,'ltl..t. iSI, t3,t'ti [ ;t'9ltlUt.t of Won ,?;94.11 f!C11M3101t) AI `V~tirch on s ,~, a irl ?i'-,:Tt'': a ih z.:t', ; ibitiit in or with ils appl94atic'n for such p=,t-liit of r+::s> .:..r [`s:I e tt* she Srcrc.taty (hart it has t:stabii licd (in ".+I`(i`r :t 1, ?j1;i'!i?.'. ttiii h9 ,'1c Sccri.ta[y !,hai1 11r.:sciiiw) at b~'ini (t) 1 ?Lif 1:6,.: , t'. lau J' ~,, 't i~r,[li! J*i:`,it1w Board*) to rc~r:r.,k bit)r;t ;1i',a1 .tnd ?~::i:9'rt.,tl.1~ i4:11`.i.e'S 1.T~ttlt X714 tiur?).i=? ;UbJC Is,xicU':ICU at Cf "vr9()(1S~ r.t1 b?" '?:R: ri t: 41(tl t' .^ ,Il ,~'( t.`r 1't l'. 9~'e F:A',iiES C?J I;'i Dili f!ia['t ::uj C5 ,A 4ti,,k. es ~1.' li l'.1? , it ;'Ic .;,`, l.tl\ 1i1.J.1 l'.',(,3CIi0 :i ('=t}gnim within ItIC Dcr:sfunctat 'Cl' i11~t'?aTiisia 101 and g::id.xncc with rcWWccs t) rthical 1:11=9(') ;i!`,:'d in I 0'171l:016t1! v I:h l)it)9I'~ttical or hrhav9 )f 1 31"Starch ar:vQIvina; 113 1 .t.r,I1,cct'SJf^ rt?ensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of Truman :subjects. In addition to possessing the professional competence necessary to review specific research activities, the IR3 shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRR shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRS regularly reviews research that involves a vulnerable category of subjects, including but not limited to subjects covered by other subparts of this part, the IREt shall include one or more individuals who are primarily concerned with the welfare of these subjects. (b) No IRS may consist entirely of men or entirely of 1'omen, or entirely of members of One profession. (c) Each 1RJB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas; for examnic:: lawyers, ethicists, ineinbers of the i;lergy . ((I) liach 1R8 shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution. (e) No IRB may have a member participating in the IRS's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide informaiiin requested by the iRS. (f) An IRS may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of complex issues which require c:epertise beyond or in addition to that available on the (RB. These individuals may not vote with the IRIS. ? 46.104 IRB functions and operations. In order to fulfill the requirements (if these cep'ulations each IRIS shall: (a) follow written procedures as provided in ? 46.103(b)(4). Page 7 (b) Except when an expedited review procedure is used (see ? 46.1 10), review proposed research at convened meetings at which a majority of the members of the IRS are present, including at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas. In order for the research to be approved, it shall receive the approval of a majority of those members present at the meeting. (c) Be responsible for reporting to the appropriate institutional officials and the Secretary' any serious or continuing noncompliance by investigators with the requirements and determinations of the IRB. 46.109 IRB review of research. (a) An IRS shall review and have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove, all research activities covered by these regulations. (b) An 1813 shall require that information given to subjects as part' of informed consent is in accordance with ? 46.116. The IRS may require that information, in addition to that specifically mentioned in ? 46,116, be given to the subjects when in the 1RB `s judgment the information would meaningfully add to the protection of the rights and welfare of subjects, (c,) An IRS shall require documentation of informed consent or may waive documentation in accordance with ? 46.117. (d) An IRS shall notify investigators and the institution in writing of its decision to approve or disapprove dm- proposed research activity, or of modifications required to secure IRB approval of the research activity. If the IRS decides to disapprove a research activity, it shall include in its written notification ' Itcpor;s should he tiled with the Office for I'r,,i ciion from Research Risks. National institutes of Health, Department of Health and Yuman Services, Eteihcsda. htarytarrd 20:05 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 45 CFR 46 -. -,Approved-For-Release-24WVO-7409-:-G4A RDP-96 007RSR001.W009 nO 7 46.1 14 Cooperative research. Cooperative research projects are those projects, normally supported through grants, contracts, or similar arrangements, which involve institutions in addition to the grantee or prime contractor (such as a contractor with the grantee, or a subcontractor with the prime contractor). In such instances, the grantee or prime contractor remains responsible to the Department for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. Also, when cooperating institutions conduct some or all art the research involving some or all of these subjects, each cooperating institution shall comply with these regulations as though it received funds for its participation in the project directly from the Department, except that in complying with these regulations institutions via use joint review, r?.liance upon tit review of another qualified IRB, Or similar arrangements aimed.' at ;wooedance of duplication of eftort, t- 46.115 IRE records. (i+) An institution, or where appropriatc an !RB, shall prepare and maintain adequate documentation of 1kB activities, including the following: (1) Copies of all research proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany the proposals, approved sample consent documents, progress reports submitted by inv.astigators, and reports of injuries to subjects. (2) Minutes of 1RB meetings which shall be in sufficient detail to show attendance at the meetings; actions waken by the IRB; the vote, on these actions including the number of rasembers voting for, against, and :abstaining: the basis for requiring changes, in or disapproving research; and a written summary of the discussion of controverted issues and their resolution. (3) Records of continuing review :activities. (4) Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and the investigators. (5) A list of IRB members as required by ? 46,103(b)(3). (6) Written procedures for the IRU as required by * 46.103(b)(4). (7) Statements of significant new participation, a description of the findings provided to subjects, as 4 procedures to be followed, and required by ? 46.116(b)(5). ( identification of any procedures (b) The records required by this I_ which are experintental? regulation shall be retained for at #i (2) A description of any reasonably least 3 years after completion of the 'f(weseeable risks or discomforts to the research, and the records shall be 4 subject; accessible for inspection and copying ("t;) A description of any benefits to by authorized representatives of the the subject or to others which may Department at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner. seeking informed ctY"s rat the following information shell be provided to each sttbject: It) A statement that the study involves research. an explanation of the purposes of the research and the a, expected duration of the subject's reasonably be expected from the earth; ? 46.116 General requirements ? alternative procedures or courses of for informed consent. treatment, if any, that might be Except as provided elsewhere in : advantageous to the subject; this or other subparts, no investigator (5) A statement describing the may involve a human being as a extent, if any, to which subject in research covered l::y these confidentiality of records identifying regulations unless tha: investigator has the subject will be maintained; obtained the legally effective (6) For research involving more unformed consent of the subject or the than minimal risk, an explanation as ' subject s legally authorized representative. An investigator shall seek such consent only un4cr circumstances that provide the prospective subject?cor the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or riot to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence The information that is given to the subject or the representative shall be in language understandable to 14-subject or the representative..do informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases of appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution or its agents ir-ona liability for negligence. (a) Basic elements of informed consent. Except as provided in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, in to whether any compensation and an 1tJ explanation as to whether any medical treatments are available if injury occurs and, if so, what they consist of, or where further infor Cation may be obtained; An explanation of whom to contact for answers to pertinent questions about the research and ,research subjects' rights, and whom to contact in the event of a research- related injury to the subject; and ~# A statement that participation is voluntary, refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits .to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled. r (h) Additional elements of informed consent, When appropriate, one or more of the following elements of information shall also he provided to each subject: Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 45.C111,11 46 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 period of funding, but definite plans the subjects and others, and the would not normally be set forth in the importance of the knowledge to he application or proposal. These gained. include activities such as institutional (b) On the basis of this evaluation, type grants (including bloc grants) the Secretary may approve or where selection of specific projects is disapprove the application or the institution's responsibility; proposal, or enter into negotiations to research training grants where the develop an approvable one. activities involving subjects retrain to he selected: and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments. prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. These applications need not be reviewed by an IRE3 beforee, an award may be made. However, except for research described in * 46.101(b), no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in these regulations, and certification _s?.abrnitted to the Department. 4 46.119 Research undertaken without the intention of inv,alvin ; human subjects. In the event research (conducted or funded by the Department) is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects. but it is Liter proposed to use human subjects in the research, the research shrill first be reviewed and approved by an 1R0, .a:, provided in these regulations, a ccrufication submitted to the Department, and final approval given 10 the proposed change by the, Dcpar?ntcrit. 46.1211 isvaluation and dtspo.sition of applications and proposals. (a) The Secretary will evaluate all applications and proposals involving human subjects submitted to the Department through such officers and employees of the Department and 5,ac h experts and consultants as the Secretary determines to be appnqriawc (his evaluation will take 146.121 Investigational new drug or device 11y delay requirement. When an institution is required to prepare or to submit a certification with an application or proposal under these regulations, and the application or proposal involves an investigational new drug (within the meaning of 21 tLS.C. 355(i) or 357(d)) or a significant risk device (as defined in 21 CFR 812.3(m)), the institution shall identify the drug or device in the certification. The institution shall also state whether the 30-day interval required for investigational new drugs by 21 CFR 312.1(a) and for significant risk devices by 21 CI's 812.30 has elapsed, or whether the Food and Drug Administration has waived that requirement. It' the 30-day interval has expired, the institution shall state whether the Food at?d Drug Administration has requested that the sf)on.cor continue to withhold or restrict the use of the drug or device in human subjects. If the 30-day interval has not expired, and a waiver ha?a not been received, the institution shall =rend a"5taien,ent to the Department upon expiration (if the interval. The Department will not consider .s certification acceptable until the institution has submitted a statement that the 30-day interval has elapsed, and the Food and Drug Administration has not requested it to limit the use of the drug or device, or that the Food and Drug Administration has waived the :30-day interval. 46.122 Use of Federal funds. page II regulations, including all subparts of these regulations, have been satisfied. 4 46.123 Early termination of research funding; evaluation of subsequent applications and proposals. (a) The Secretary may require that Department funding for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requiretrients, when the Secretary finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms.of these regulations, (b) In making decisions about funding applications or proposals covered by these regulations the Secretary may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person who would direct the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has in the judgment of the Secretary materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not Department funds were involved). 0 46.124 Conditions. With respect to any research project or any class of research projects the Secretary may impose additional conditions prior to or at the time of funding when in the Secretary's judgment additional conditions are necessary for the protection of human subjects. Subuart 8--Additional protections Pertaining to Research Development, and Related 'Activities Irnvolvkng Fetuses.'' Pregnant Women, and Human In Vitro Fertilization' Soupici:: 40 FR i3525, Aug X. 1975. 43 FR 1758, Januaro i 1, 1979, 43 FR 51559. N.ivCniber 3. 1979 into consideration the risks to the Federal funds administered by the 46.201 Applicability. Sublets, the adequacy of protection Department may not he expended for (a) the regulations in this subpart against these risks, the potential research involving human subjects are applicable to all Department of benefits of the proposed research to unless the.. rectuiremerit of these Health, hducation, and Welfare Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 i'~gt" 12 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 grants and contract supporting research, development, and related activities involving: (1) The fetus. (2) pregnant women, and (3) human in vitro fertilization. (b) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as indicating that compliance with the procedures set forth herein will in any way render inapplicable pertinent State or local laws bearing upon activities covered by this subpart. (c) The requirements of this subpart are in addition to those imposed under the other subparts of this part. 46.202 Purpose. It is the purpose of this subpart to provide additional safeguards in reviewing activities to which this subpart is applicable to assure that they conform to appropriate ethical standards and relate to important societal needs. ai 46.203 Definitions, As used in this subpart: (a) "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and any other officer or employee of the Department of Health, Education,,and Welfare to whom authority has been delegated, (b) "Pregnancy,. encompasses the period of time from confirmation of implantation (through any of the presumptive signs of pregnancy, such as missed menses, or by a medically acceptable pregnancy test), until expulsion or extraction of the fetus. (c) "Fetus" means the product of conception from the time of implantation (as evidenced by any of the presumptive signs of pregnancy. such as missed menses, or a medically acceptable pregnancy test), until a determination is made, following expiusion or extraction of the fetus, that it is viable. (d) "Viable" as it pertains to the taus means being able, after either spontaneous or induced delivery, to survive (given the benefit of available medical therapy) to the point of independently maintaining heart beat and respiration. The Secretary may from time to time, taking into account medical adeance%, publish in the FEDr_RAL It ectsrest guidelines to assist in determining whether a fetus is viable for purposes of this subpart. If a fetus is viable after delivery, it is a premature infant. (e) "Nonviable fetus" means a fetus rx urero which, although living, is not vials,;;. (a) "Dead fetus" means a fetus ex uteri) which exhibits neither heartbeat, spontaneous respiratory activity, spontaneous movement of voluntary muscles, nor pulsation of the umbilical cord (if still attached). (g) "lit vitro fertilizaation" means any fertilization of human ova which occurs outside the"body of a female, either through admixture of donor human sperm and ova or by any other means. * 46.204 'Ethical Advisory` Boards. r (a) One or more Ethical Advisory Boards shall be established by the Secretary. Members of these hoard(s) shall be so selected that the board(s) will be competent to deal with medical, legal, social, ethical. and related issues and may include, for example. research scientists, physicians, psychologists, sociologists, educators, lawyers, and ethicists, as well as represcutatives of the pert a! public. No board member may be a regular, full-time employee of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (h) At the request of the Secretary, the Ethical Advisory Board shall render advice consistent with the policies and requirements of this !Tart as to ethical issues, involving activities covered by this subpart, raised by individual applications or proposals. In addition, upon request by the Secretary, the Board shall render advice as to classes of applications or proposals and general policies, guidelines, and procedures. (c) A hoard may establish, with the approval of the Secretary, classes of applications or proposals which: (1) Must be submitted to the Board, or (2) need not be submitted to the Board. Where the Board so establishes a class of applications or proposals which must be submitted, no application or proposal within the class may be funded by the Department or any component thereof until the application or proposal bgs been reviewed by the Board and the Board has rendered advice as to its acceptability from an ethical standpoint. (4) No application or proposal involving human in vitro fertilization may be funded by the Departmernl or Any component thereof until the application or proposal has been reviewed by the Ethical Advisory Board and the Board has rendered advice as to its acceptability froramr an ethical standpoint. 46.205 AdditkmW dutic$ of tic drtstitutia i)1 ;tr'lll rdt In connection with activities involving fetuses, pregnant women, or human, its vitro fertilization. (a) In addition to the responsibilities prescribed for Institutional Review Boards under Subpart A of this part, the applicant's or offerors Board shall, with respect to activities covered by this subpart, carry out the following additional duties: (1) Determine that all aspects of the activity meet the requirements of this subpart: (2) Determine that adequate consideration has been given to the manner in which potential subjects will be selected, and adequate provision has been made by the applicant or offeror for monitoring the actual informed consent process (e.g., through such mechanisms, when appropriate, as participation by the Institutional -Review Board or subject advocates in: (i) Overseeing the actual process by which individual consents required by this subpart are secured either by approving induction of each individual into the, activity or Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 AS -(:'FRmm46 Approved For Release 2004/07/09: CIA-RD P96,,;D0.Z6PRQQ, 0 -7 verifying, perhaps through sampling, that approved procedures for induction of individuals into the activity are being followed, and (ii:t monitoring the progress of the activity and intervening as necessary through such steps as visits to the activity site and continuing evaluation to determine if any unanticipated risks have arisen); (3) Carry out such other responsibilities as may be assigned by the Secretary. (b) No award may he issued until the applicant or offeror has certified to the Secretary that the Institutional Review Board has made the determinations required under paragraph (a) of this section and the Secretary has approved these determinations, as provided in ? 46.120 of Subpart A of this part. (c) Applicants or offerors seeking support for activities covered by this subpart must provide for the designation of an Institutional Review Board, subject to approval by the Secretary, where no such Board has been established under Subpart A of this part, 46.206 General limitations. (it) No activity to which this subpart is applicable may be undertaken unless: ( 1) Appropriate studies on animals Send nonpregnant individuals have been completed; (2) Except where the purpose of the activity is to meet the health needs of the mother or the particular fetes,, the risk to the fetus is minimal and in all cases, is the least possible risk for achieving the objectives of the activity. (3) Individuals engaged in the activity will have no part in: (i) Any decisions as to the timing, method, tad procedures used to terminate the pregnancy, and (ii) determining the viability of the fetus at the tesirination of the pregnancy; and (41 No procedural changes which may cause greater than minimal risk to the fetus or the pregnant woman owdl he introduced into the procedure for terminating the pregnancy solely in the int,.rest of the activity. (b) No inducements, monetary or otherwise, may be offered to terminate pregnancy for purposes of the activity. loo FR 33528, Aug. 8. 1975, as amended at 40 FR 51638. Nov. 6, 1975) 1 46.207 Activities directed toward pregnant women as subjcts. (a) No pregnant woman may he involved as a subject in an activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) The purpose of the activity is to meet the health needs of the mother and the fetus will be placed at risk only to the minimum extent necessary to meet such needs, or (2) the risk to the fetus is minimal. (b) An activity permitted under paragraph (a) of this section may be conducted only if the mother and father are legally competent and have given their informed consent alter having been Fully informed regarding possible impact on the fetus, except that the father's informed consent need not he secured if: (1) The purpose of the activity is to>F-ineet the health needs of the. mother; (2) his identity or wheereahtluts cannot reasonably be ucertained; (3).he is not reasonably available; or 0) the pregnancy resulted from rape. 146.208 Activities directed toward fetuses In utermu as subjects"- (a) No fetus in iiteraa may he involved as a suhj~-ct in any activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) The purpose of the activity is to meet the health needy of the particular fetus and the fetus. will he placed at risk' only to the minimum extent necessary to meet such needs, or (2) the risk to the fetus imposed by the research is minimal and the purpose of the activity is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by other means. (b) An activity permitted under paragraph (a) of this section may be conducted only if the mother and father are legally competent and have given their informed consent, except that the father's consent need not be secured if: (1) His identity or whereabouts cannot reasonably be ascertained, (2) he is not reasonably available, or (3) the pregnancy resulted from rape. 46.209 Activitits directed toward fetuses ex utero, Including nonviable fetuses, as subjects. (a) Until it has been ascertained whether or not a fetus ex utero is viable, a fetus ex utero may not be involved as a subject in an activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) There will be no added risk to the fetus resulting from the activity, and the purpose of the activity is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be obtained by other means, or (2) The purpose of the activity is to enhance the possibility of survival of the particular fetus to the point of viability. (b) No nonviable fetus may be involved as a subject in an activity covered by this subpart unless: (1) Vital functions of the fetus will not be artificially maintained, (2) Experimental activities which of themselves would terminate the heartbeat or respiration of the fetus will not be employed, and (3) The purpose of the activity is the development of important biomedical knowledge which cannot be. obtained by other means. (c) In the event the fetus er utero is found to be viable, it may be included as a subject in the activity only to the extent permitted by and in accordance with the requirements of other subparts of this part. (d) An activity permitted under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be conducted only if the mother and father are legally competent and have given their informed consent, except that the father's informed consent need not be secured if: (1) his identity or whereabouts cannot reasonably be ascertained, (2) he is Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 ..Page Is Approvedl?_F, Relea,-w_ 04J07142_ L1A RD_PR .Q.Q7O&MU 5.00 510--7.._._..-- fi ICES HUMAN SUBJECTS Minimum Criteria tdt>l and only pursuant to a requesst by the head of `such authority. Such requests must 4! ?1mroved by the Se =retary or Under Secretary ci the Army, 'Under these circumstances expert; personnel may be provider? to such agency pro- eclod participation in law enforcement aactivi- tie:; is limited as follows: (a) Only personnel with technical skill:; not readily available to such h.tw enforcemeui ,authorities, which can be utilized to preveu; d. oath or serious injury, may be provided; (b) Provision of such personnel will be limited to that necessary to prevent the death or serious injury th:.-A is thrreatened. but in no -ease shall such. assistance be provided for snore thear 72 hours; (e) Such pcraonnel are not used to ap- prehend persons who are suspected of corn., ml!ling, or who are about to con)mit:, a crime, - ........~ pI!3~'et''s res'pulisal;ilitics; if soy' t i , ., , for reporting (3) Ewerpencii rs;;sistta,aee. In cn)al'gel)a'.y' ~. to the 1)A about about imit.ters that. cone to the em- sitnations, where life is, endangered, the request. Irc))'a",,'S atttntiol) while on assignment outside rc;aiuira:cl in (1) and (2) above may be oral, piL''viered that it is reduced to v;1?iting and sots.. mitled to IIQDA(DAMI.--CI( ) within 72 hours. Where life is endangered, doabt as to 11 10, legal it .igi;;nent of ))A intelligence personnel to other .agencies within the federal government. This ;)rt)e(~rlure does not apply to--- I) Assignment to state or local govern;.- anent:;, corporations or other private organizaa- i ions. (2) Assignment to another agency within the intelligence community when part of the t)urpo;;e of the a assignment. is to gain experience' nd knowledge about the activities of the other ;aigency-. (Reporting or report in this context the I)epartntelit. (2) Other" than is permitted by the terms of the memorandum of aailreernent pursuant to D1wD Directive 1000.17, an e iployee of ,an Army i;ttelligenre component on assignment to an. Other agency of the federa.al i'overnmexit. may not report to any Army component the operations or pt'rsonnci of the agency to which the enm- 1)loyee is assigned. (.i) Aft. r completion of an assignment to unoilter a> ency of the federal government and return to 1)A, an emr)loycc:: remains under the isle restrictions, as to reporting, that applied when the employee was on such ass,ignliaent. '?-18. Procedure 14. Expcrinientaition on human subjects. a. A pj licai.ility and scope. (1) This is1'oc duce applies to experirnen- t itiwi on human salt,ieets it such experimenta- t;ion is sondu~ted by or on behalf of any Army ilttelligencce component. 'T'his procedure does not apply to eypel'al>scotatioll on animal subjects. I Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 1984 CHAPTER 3 POLICIES Paragraph Pape Approval -----_--_--_-_-_--____- -_-__- -` Risk determinations -------,____----_,_____ _-_~--__ 3-2 ______ 3-3 Risk versus benefit __._--___ -.ry- 3-4 Moral, ethical and legal concepts ------______-._ Fully informed subjects -_---?--- --M--.--__-_____._-__ 3- Use of non-US citizens -----__..._______________ 3-6 6 Use of prisoners of war and detainees --n----__ ----_-- ?- 3-7 Medical care --------------a___--- __ 33--9 Stated objectives - ------W___-.__________________ Physical and mental suffering ---- -- ._______________ 33- 111 Qualifications of investigators ----------_--.3-12 CHAPTER 4 PROCEDURAL GUIDANCE 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-2 3-2 3-2 3-2 y and Development Command -__._-------_________..4-2 4-1 Minimum standards ------------------------------ -4 4-1 More than minimal risk 4 4-4 4-1 4-5 4-1. Contractors or vendors 4-6 4-1 CHAPTER 5 INSCOM HUMAN TECHNOLOGY REVIEW BOARD (HTRb) ACTIVITIES Composition of the HTTRB5-1 General criteria for membership ------------------- _ _ 5-1 General committee activities 5-2 5-1 Avoiding possible conflicts of interest ---------- _ 5_ 5-1 Criteria for INSCOM HTRB approval --_--_-___ - 5-4 5 5-1 Special considerations of sensitivity --.-------___- 5-5 5- 2 Suspension or terminations of a project ------------ 5-7 5-2 Records ----------------------------------------------- 5-7 55-3 Y 2 A - Terms and Abbreviations B - Format for Preparation an of aR, A-? ~sear.ch Protocol------ B-1 C - Volunteer Agreement, Part A D - Volunteer Agreement, Part 3 ------.-- _---e___-_.,..,,___- C-1 D-1 ii Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 GENERAL teVFCORM TIOP 'SCOM Regulation 15-3 HbZ"a,a,:ax v 1984 C;i7sratsai~i.ons and c c imrtttes HIGH ERFORJ` C'P R.EVTEW PROC1 un Wring 1982 and 199:3, in ke4:~tb#.rrn wttt.h the US Army inteL1i e3"fC'4% r. fit;?"1 t eP.,x (IiN1`0 `r t E~t7 p of to f~ t*xa.zxac rr9i.~:att Security n~ra,r~4 to a lure: which exceeds cf,r.nr~drlrerfor cep" and seokln V move the 4::',^7{r.li conducted y ~f? tncpazsrd~ ?ew of r,f.t friaana , }turfy of }~ L ;h performing the public uuxlr and private sectors. v Orr rrt~at 1oa~^ and ~ x Cs 4)~. Ca ~'rd x~} fit 7~ ar as e Sral tea..~"l chnfgt s' 1 t.:d t1~ t"experiences and programs m" were a ff s'c~~t; "lt.,a1+~ f .?~~;:~ifk ~~jf~ka!.~ respect t experiences their their P,r .t ent t.f.le for further ealatii f.. 4 1A ~. '{ .~ ~.. to " and unit performance .. o n t ?" i ~'~ ^.~ }Ste o the u 'C; . '~E'f ~ ((.. TJ e ti ~.t s a p/a'~. War w thin the Command. development t \C lt' s' ~.. and ^~~,H~.4i. ay. ? rc tw43trtA$_r Fa the use rpf 11"ISCOM ante for that evaluation, establishes s pr cel personnel as lrxe vo } unfre ior .e rsn ev a rr t r a n eme further Implementing Ya..t d3PY f for ~I~1liirxr. ~ 3 and , _ k ;u -1ve Secretary of the HThB 6Y "e view Boar (H ) EPA RTmE.' T O THE MY UNITED STATES ARMY IN'TE ..LLGENCF AND SECElt;,ITY C01'NAN13 A.rlftigtori Hall Station Arlington, Virginia 22712 ins? officials -..y.m,.?-.?-- ar4f Staff h1~ er~t Head s "C OM Human Teehnol,-, , -~ ..~..~. ~., ' 4 Il ?t x r () L f) lrCft Cyt'~a"c ` -F ,.. ..?....,....,- .. 4. 14' ct r ,roar trr tr :n ; Page n. 1 n 2-2 2-1 . -l 2-1 -Ma 2-2 2-5 7.2 -.5 2-2 2-7 2.3 2-3 2-,'0 2-11 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001506090010-7 24 Februa. I9~ xppr v d For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788RO0J,Q009Q1(kZgola Chapter 1 ion 15,3 INFORMATION I.-I. Purpose. This regulation contains INSCO { policies and guidance for the evaluation and implementation of high performing human systems within the corn- mand it - a. Promulgates procedures and guidance for the us F of INSCO as volunteers in the evaluation of high performing human systems; personnel b. Establishes and implement; a review process, which is consistent with AR 70-25; c. Insures the continued evaluation of "NSCOM activities to assure that the provisions of AR 70-25 are being followed;. d. 'Establishers procedures to obtai,a .a lhealth hazard assessment prior to approving an INSCOM protocol issued as required herein; and e. Promulgates IriNSCOM policies and procedures to assure that "NSCOM com- ponents do not engage in or contract for experimentation, on human subjects in violatidn of Procedure 13, AR 381.1,0. 1.2, Applicability. This regulation applies to all elements of the INSCOM. 1-3. References. a. AR 70-25, Use of Volunteers as Subjects of Research. b. AR 331-10, US Army Intelligence Activities. C- AR 70-31, Standards for Technical Reporting. 1-4. Scope. a. Nothing in this regulation is intended to supersede requirements for health hazard or other safety reviews required by any other regulations or di- rectives. h. The procedures, policies and guidance contained in this regulation pertain to the following: (1) Behavioral studies, research and/or testing involving human sub- jects, regardless of whether conducted by INSCOM, a contractor, or other agency utilizing INSCOM funds. (2) Inclusion of human srubje.c ts, whether as the direct or indirect Object of research, regardless of the level or risk involved., In the develop_ nre>nt, testing or stuc:y of matters asso,-Lited with the missions and. functions of Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 US.A1NCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 1984 the INSCOM, or the application of non-traditional ideas and technologies in achieving high performance of human resources. (3) The investigation of programs and technoloie=_s to enhance organ-, izational and individual excellence where such investigation involves the In- clusion of human subjects as their object. . Exemptions. a. Research, testing and studies in which human subjects are involved in one or more of the following categories are exempt from this regulation. (1) Bonafide activities under the sponsorship of another Department of the Army component and involving surveys or interviews where all of the fol-- lowing conditions exist: (a) Responses are recorded in such a way that subjects cannot be identified directly or indirectly. (b) The subject's responses, if they become known, would n,)t: place the subject at risk of criminal or civil liability or damage the sub-.. ,ject's financial or social standing or empl.oyab_t.lity. (c) The activity =does not deal with sensitive aspects of the subject's own behavior, such as illegal conduct, drug use, sexual behavior, or use of alcohol. (2) Research which involves the us,e of educational tests, provid=ace the data is recorded in such a way that. the subjects cannot be identified d.i-., rectly or indirectly. (3) Research in non-INSCOM educational settings which involve normal. educational practices, such as ---- (a) Regular and special educational strategies. (b) The effectiveness or the comparison among techniques of in- struction, curricula, or classroom methods. (4) Follow-up debriefings, interviews, tests, or evaluations to de- termine how well participants have learned the information or skills transmit- ted by training or instructional activit:iC_s previously attended by the subject thereof. b. Exemptions of other activities from this regulation, even where such activities may be exempted from other milai ref-,u.lations or directives, shall not be considered valid for INSCOM purposes unless and until confirmed by the INSCOM Human Technology Review Board as proscribed elsewhere in this regula- tion. 1-2 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24 February ved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788?6MT M ' is t ion 15-3 Chapter 2 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.-?l. Approving officials. The Commanding General, the Deputy Commander, Ins to l.ligence, and the Deputy Commander, Support, are the designated INSCOM ap??, proving officials. Only these officials may approve the use of human subjects in research. 2-2. Commanders and Staff Element Heads. Commanders at all levels within the NSCOM, heads mo PHc dquarters s?taf f YeI.eme.nts, office chiefs and program direc- tars (hereinafter referred to only as commanders and staff element heads) are responsible within their respective functional areas for a. Insuring that the provisions of this regulation are institutionalized into their organizational procedures and practices. b. Insuring that no persons engage? in or contract for experimentation involving human subjects without the express approval of an INSCC)M approving official. 2-3 INSCOM Human Technology Review Board (HTRB) . be INSCOM HTRB3 is respon- sible for --- a. Observing written procedures for the following: (1) Initial and continuing review of research, including the reports of findings and actions to the investigator and the approving official. (2) Determination of those projects which must be -- (a) Reviewed more often than annually. (b) Verified from sources other than the investigators that no material changes have occurred since. the previous HTRB review. (3) Prompt reporting to the HTRB of proposed changes in the re- search, and to the E1-RB and approving official of unexpected problems involving rLsks to the subjects or others. b. Insuring that changes in approved projects (during the period for which approval has already been given) are not initiated without HTRB review, except to eliminate immediate hazards to a subject. C. Reviewing proposed protocols at meetings attended by a majority of members except when an expedited review is used. For the protocol to be ap- proved, it will receive the approval of a majority of those members 'present. d. Reporting to the CG any serious or cant inuing noncompliance with HTRB requirements and determinations found by irrve attgators. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 19134 e. Conducting a continuous review of research studies at intervals pro-- per to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year. f. Insuring the observation by a third party of the consent process and each investigation, as appropriate. g. Recommending safeguards or special. conditions to a protocol. When such recommendations are made, the approving official may take the following action: (1) Not reduce the safeguards or conditions, and approve the proto- (2) Require additional safeguards. (3j Disapprove the protocol. (4) Refer the protocol to a higher 'echelon approving authority for action and review. 2-4. Chairperson of the HTRB. The DCSPPM is designated Chairperson and a reg.- ular member Oaf the 41TRI and is responsible for chairing HHTRB meetings, keeping the CG informed of HTR.B activities, and recommending approval/disapproval of HTRB regular members to the CC. . 2-5. Executive Secretary of the HTRB. The DC.SPPM will designate a member of his stiff tsa...,be~the- Executive Secretary of the HIRB. The Executive Secretary of the HTRB is responsible for -- a. Insuring that the responsibilities of the HTRB prescribed in - para- graph 2-3 are carried out. b. Preparing and distributing the agenda for each meeting to all HTRB members. C,. Insuring that all HTRB members are afforded the opportunity to corn- ment on HTRB actions conducted under expedited review procedures. 2-6. Regular HTRB membership. The INSCOM DCSOPS, DCSPER, DCSSYS, SJA, Command Chaplain az dDARCOM LNG, are each responsible for nomination of an individual to serve as a regular member of the HTRB. Nominees may be from their respec- tive staffs, subordinate command functional counterpart staffs, or may be the nominating element head. Nominations will be submitted to the HTRB Chairperson (DCSPPM) for approval/disapproval. by the CC. Nominations may be by letter, DF or message, and will contain the information required by par,-,graph a, below. a. Nominees will he identified by name, earned degree,_:, current position and duties, and experience, such as board c.crtificacions and licenses. The in- formation in the nomination will he campLete enough to describe each member's chief expected contributions to HTRB revi yw=.. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24 February 1984 USAlisL M Regulation 15-3 b.' Nominees will normally be military officers in the grade of 0-5, or above, or civilian employees, CS-13 or above. Nominees will have diverse back- grounds to insure thorough review of research studies involving human volun- teers as research subjects. Nominees should be of varied racial and cultural backgrounds. Nominees should have displayed sensitivity to such issues as com- munity attitudes, and respect for advice and counsel and for the rights and welfare of human subjects. c. Confirmed nominees will serve as HTRB members for an indefinite term, and will be expected to have final authority to speak on behalf of their activ- ity. 2-7. Ex officio HTRB membership. The incumbents of the following positions will serve= as ex #officio, nonm-voting members of the HTR}3: a. Chief, CENTER. b. Command Psychologist. C. Chief, Human Technology Office. d. Chief, Public Affairs Office. 2-8. Ad hoe HTRB membership. The rollowing will serve as ad hoc members of the a. The Staff Advisor for Scientific and Cryptologic. Affairs. b. A physician, as approved by an INSCOM approving official (para 2-1). Physician nominees for ad hoc membership will be provided as requested by the, Chairperson. 2-9. Principal investigator. The principal investigator for each project covered by this regulation is responsible for -- a. Maintaining adequate records on the following: (1) Receipt, storage, use and disposition of all investigational ma- terials and devices. (2) Case histories that record all observations and other data im- portant to the study. (3) Volunteer agreement documents. b. Preparing progress reports, including annual reports, as determined by the approving authority and the 1NSCO4 IITRB. C. Promptly notifying the approvf_n authority, through the 7NSCOM IHTRB, of any adverse effects caused by the re=search. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 1994 d. Insuring that the research has been approved by the proper authority and the INSCOM iiTRB before starting, changing or extending a study. e. Insuring that all subjects, including those used as controls or their representatives, are fully informed of the nature of the research to include potential risks to the subject. f. Insuring that investigational materials and devices are administered only to subjects under his or her personal supervision and that of a previously approved associate investigator. g. -Insuring that volunteer recruiting teams are briefed as to the nature of the research and the ethical principles in this and related regulations. 2--10. Members of volunteer recruiting teams. Members of volunteer recruiting teams are responsible for =-~_ 1-11,111-- ---- .. 1. a. Establishing 'volunteer requirements prior to recruitment. b. Undertaking recruiting in a morally, ethically and legally acceptable manner* 2-11. Medical monitor. The medical moi.itor of each project is responsible for and is hereby delegated the authority to terminate the effort if -- a. Subjects are at risk of life or lirih, b. It appears the risk is significantly greater than anticipated at the time of review and approval of the project. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release'2004/07/09 :' CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 `2.4 February 1984 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 Chapter 3 3-1. General. Experimentation involving human technology or human subjects conducted by or on behalf of any INSCOM component may be undertaken only with the informed consent; of the subject, and In accordance with guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (DUHS), setting out conditions that safeguard the welfare of such subjects. The provisions of this regulation constitute INSCOM implementation of those guidelines. 3??2.. Approval.. INSCOM components may not engage in or contract any research or testing involving human subjects without advance approval through the INSCOM HHTRB by an INSCOM approving official, or higher level official, where appropri- ate. This approval is required regardless of the degree of risk involved. 3-3. Risk determinations. The INSCOM FCTRB will render all risk determinations regarding INSCOM research or resting involving human subjects. 3-4. Risk versus benefit. The degree of potential risk, involved in any pro- ject will never exceed the expected benefits of that effort. 3-5. Mara1, ethical and legal concepts. The moral., ethical and legal concepts on the use of human subjects will be followed as outlined in this regulation. Voluntary consent of each human subject is essential. Military personnel are not subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UUCMJ) for choosing not to t.k?* part as human subjects. 3-6. Fully _informed subjects. Only per!ons who are fully informed and volun- teer to take part may be used as human subjects in INSCOM research and testing activities. -g.-/r Use of non-US citizens. Research may be conducted outside the US that Inv lees non?-US citizens; however, all requirements of this regulation applic- able to Duman subjects shall be eggalty applicablre to non-US citizen human sub- JI~.ctS. 3_F'. Use of prisoners of war and detainees. The use of prisoners of war and cat>_r:ainees as human resarch subjects-is prohibited. Medical care. Volunteers will be authorized all necessar medic Z y . care for injury or disease that is the proximate result of taking part in approved INSCOM research or toasting. act ivit tes . 3-10. Stated objectives. Each project will be designed to achieve its stated objectives. The proposed number of subjects will be the minimum needed to in- sure that statistically significant results are obtained. .r mm 111. Physical and mental .suffering. f'ach project will. be conducted in such a ,manner as to avoid unnecessary physical and mental suffering. Preparations Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 ISSAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February, 1984 will be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the subject and in- vaestigators against all foreseeable injuries, disabilities, or death. A pro- ject will not be conducted if any reason exists to believe that death or injury will result. The degree of potential risk will never exceed the expected bene- fits of the project. 3-12. alifications of investigators. Only persons judged qualified by the appropriate apprcavin authority will conduct human subject studies. The physi- cian responsible for the health and welfare of the subject may or may not be the principal investigator. The physician is authorized to stop the project at any time he or she believes that injury, disability or dead,, may result. 3-1. Minors. Minors may not be involved as human research subjects without advance approval in each case by the INSCOM HTRB. 3-14. Recruiting of volunteers. Volunteer.,, ecuiting will be accomplished by pe sonnet responsible for theconduc.t of the particular project, or as othe. --- wise specifically approved by the INSCOM HTRB. Protocol guidance. a. Each approved protocol. will be reviewed at least annually and on a continuing basis as determined by they INSCOM HTRB. Annually means once each 12-month period. . h. The decision as to whether a research protocol involves more than minimal risk shall be made by the INSCOM 1iTRl3. c. The research protocol will be prepared in accordance with the ira- structions contained at appendix B. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 ,24,February 1984 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 Chapter 4 PROCEDURAL GUIDANCE 4--i. Technical reports. Technical reports will be prepared as prescribed in AR 70--31 and follow the".*format of MIL-ST'Dm847A. When applicable, these reports will contain the following statement: For the protection of human subjects, the investigators have adhered to the policies of AR 70-25 concer?nin the use of volunteers as research subjects. 4-2. Advising the Medical Research and Development Command. Two copies of techni .al r ports of.-study will be forwardedY to the Commander, US Army Medical Research and Development Command, ATTN: SGR1)--HR, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701. When HQD4 approval, or higher, is required, information copies of material forwarded for approval will also be furnished to the office above. These will. include as a minimum, two copies of the protocol, a copy of the volunteer agreement and all minutes of INSCOM HTRB meetings reviewing the proposed project. 4-3. Informed consent. Subjects will be given adequate time to review and un- derstand all information before agreeing to take part in a project, The volun- teer agreement documents will be written in language that is easily understood. by the subject. The documents listed below will be discussed with each subject before his or her acceptance. a. The Volunteer Agreement (appendix C). b. The Explanation Portion of the Volunteer Agreement (appendix D). 4.-t. Minimum standards. The laws, customs and practices of the country in which the 'research"Pis conducted will take precedence over procedures required by this regulation, where applicable. The project must meet the sane standards of ethics and safety, however, that apply within the US involving; U$ citizens. When standards vary, the more stringent will apply. A minimum age of 1.8 is re- quired for US citizens taking pare, in research conducted outside the US, re- gardless of the laws of the country in which the effort is being undertaken. 4--5. More than minimal risk. When it has been determined that the risk in a human subjects....-study is more than minimal, then advance approval is required through FHQDA (DAMI-CI) by the Secretary or Under Secretary of the Army. In ad- dition, a medical monitor shall be recommended by the INSCOM HTRF and approved by the CC. 4-6. Contractors or vendors. Contractors or vendors holding approved DFCEHS a_assur.ance of complianceshal.l be coni;:idered in compliance with this regulation. in the absence of such an assurance, a special assurance will be negotiated 4-1 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 App roved For Release 2004/07/09 :CIA-RDP96-00788R001500090010-7 US Tt SCt M Regulation 15-3 24 February 1984 with the contractor or vendor. In all, cases, however, the I?VSCOM lHTRB must ap`- prove the INSCON participation in or utiliz.tion of such contractors or ven- dors. 4-7. Re uesra for exceptions. Requests for exceptions to this regulation will be submitted tco--tfie INSCOM E TRB Chairperson (DCSPPM) with full justification. 4-8. Expedited review categories. Categories which may be processed in the expedited review procedures are as follows: a. Recording of data from subjects who are 18 years of age or older, using non-invasive procedures 'routinely employed in clinical practice. This category does not include exposure to electromagnetic radiation outside the visible range (e.g., X-rays, microwaves). it does include --- (1) The use of physical sensors that are applied either to the sur- face of the body or at a distance and do not -,tuvolve input of matter or signif- icant amounts of energy into the subject or an invasion of the subject's pr.-l.- vacy. (2) Such procedures as (a) Weighing. (b) Electrocard.iog~raphy. (c) Electrocncephalography. (d) Thermography. Detection of naturally occurring radioactivity. (f) Diagnostic echography. (g) Electroretinography. b. Voice recordings made for research purposes such as investigations of speech defects, improvement in language utilization, etc. c. Moderate exercise of healthy volunteers. d. Study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens. e. Minor changes in previously approved research during the period for which approval has been authorized. 4-9. Expedited review procedures. Under in expedited review procedure, tlh.-- BBTRB Chairperson, or one or moreuHTRB reviewers cleric natr d by the chairperson, may carry out the review. These reviewers may exercise all of the authorities 4-2 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24. February 1984 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 of the HTRB except that of disapproval, which may only be exercised as pre- scribed elsewhere in this regulation. a. When the expedited review procedure is used, the reviewers will fur- nish complete copies of all their actions and related materials (e.g., research plan, protocol, etc.) to all other members of the HTRB. The HTRB Chairperson will submit a written report of expedited review actions to the CtC within ten working days of approval action. b. An expedited review procedure may be restricted or suspended to pro- tect the rights or welfare of subjects at any time based upon either direction of an approving offi; ial or request by any member of the HTRB. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 USAINSCOM Regulation: 15-3 24 February 1984 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALL? LEFT PLANK Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 2G App oved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R1?@e9P 1 1ation 15 -3 ~, ,l<"+~"zuRry 11..33 Chapter 5 INSCQM HUMAN TECHNOLOGY REVIEW BOARD ACTIVITIES 5 ?1 Composition of the 11TR13. He:rzbership in the INSCOM IITRB will consist of the chair person; at x- least sixaoth r regular members, appointed by the CG from ee,ng the nominations submitted in accordance with paragraph 2-6 and 2--8, or from other sources; an executive secretary; and such other ex officio and ad hoc members as prescribed in chapter 2, above. One regular member will be not affiliated with the INSCOM and not part of the :immediate family of a person affiliated with the INSCOM. 5--2. General criteria for membership. At least one member of the KTRB will. frcm a~prryfes Mort po sitiorw%aetivi.ty primarily concerned with the welfare of htr- ;ran persons. At least one member will be non-scientific, such as a lawyer, ethicist or member of the clergy. THE INSCOM HTRB may invite persons with spe- cial competence to assist in the review of complex issues that require exper- tise beyond that available on the HTRB. These persons normally will not vote, unless he or she is serving as the non-'I.NSCOM member of the HTRB. 5-3. General committee activities. Each regular and ad hoc committee member shall have" one equal vote, anei the entire committee will be vested with the re- sponsibility to determine if a proposed activity is acceptable. Acceptability will be in terms of Army Medical Department (AMEDD) commitments and regula- ti.;rns, applicable law, standards of conduct and practice, and with full consid- eration for the particularly sensitive nature of the INSCOM`s role as an i.ntel- licence component. a. At least five voting members w,.11 be required to constitute a quorum at c ach committee meeting. b. All actions of the committee will be by majority vote of members present . 5-1a., Avoiding possible conflicts of interest. a. Except to provide information requested by the HTR13, no LNSCOM HTRB member may take part in a review of any project which is sponsored by that mem- be=.r?s organization or office of employment or assignment, or in which there may otherwise be a conflict or appearance of a conflict of interest. b. The intended approving official may not be a member of the HTRB. The appriving official may not approve research for which he or she is also a prin- cipal or associate Investigator. A higher echelon of command must. review and approve such projects. 5-5. Criteria for INSCOM HTRB approval. a. In evaluattng the risks and benefits for projects under considera- tion, the INSCOM HTRB should consider only those that may result from that 5LL-L Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 ROO 1500090010-7 , ar i9 HSA.SNSGOM Regulation 15-3 24 particular project, unless a clear linkage has been established to other pr ,- cts. b. To approve an effort covered by this regulation, the INSCOM HTRB must determine that all of the requirements below are met. (1) Risks to subjects are minimized by using procedures that are -- (a) Consistent with sound investigation design and do not unni-'-- essarily expose subjects to risk. (b) Already being used on. subjects for diagnosis or treatment, when appropriate. (2) Risks to subjects are reasoaabie in relation to (a) Anticipated benefits, if any, to the subjects. (b) The importance of the knowledge that may be expected to (3) In making an assessment for the selection of subjects, the span?- .aor has adequately considered -- (a) The purpose of the investigation. (b) The setting in which the, ,research investigation will be con- ( (4) Informed consent will be secure from each subject. (5) Informed consent will be properly documented. (6) The protocol. takes adequate provisions for monitoring the data collected to insure the safety of., the subjects. (7) Adequate provisions exist to protect the privacy of subject:Y and to maintain the confidentiality of data when appropriate. 5?6. Special considerations of sensitivity. Some or all of the subjects may be vulnerable to special considerations of sensitivity because of past assignments, affiliations, etc. In such cases, additional safeguards will be included to protect the rights and welfare of these subjects. In no instance will the INSCOM be a party to any research which involves the use of persons with acute or severe physical or mental illness, or those who are economically or educa.-? tionally disadvantaged. 5-7. Suspension or termination of a project. a. The INSCOM will suspend or terminate a project that - 5-2 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 tSAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 1984 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT 3LA..NK 5-4 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24 February 1984 USATNSCO14 Regulation 15-3 (1) Is not being conducted according to the 11TRB's requirements. (2) Has been associated with unexpected harm to the subjects. b. Suspensions or terminations of a project will include a statement of the reasons for the HTRB's action, and will be reported within 24 hours to the principal investigator and the approving official. 5-E.8. Records. a. The HTRB executive secretary will prepare and maintain adequate doeu?- mennts on }1TRB activities, including --- (1) Copies of all pro-,osals reviewed, scientific evaluations that accompany the proposals, approved sample consent documents, progress reports submitted, by investigators, and reports of injuries and adverse reactions. (2) Minutes of 1ITRB meetings showing attendance; actions taken by the INSCO1 tiTRB; the vote of these actions, including the number of members vot!ng for, against, and abstaining a decision; the basis for requiring changes or disapproving a project; and a written summary of the discusston of contro- verted issues and their resolution_ t t,ators. (3) (4) Records of continuing review activities. Copies of all correspondence be;ween the HTRB and project inves?- (5) A current lift of HHTRB members.. Members will be identified by came, earned degrees, representative capacity and experience, such as board certifications and licenses. The information will be complete enough to des- cribe each member's chief expected contributions to HTRB review. s. Any employ-- ment:. or other relationship between members and the INSCOM will be noted. 4 (6) Written procedures, including agendas, expedited review proce- dures, etc., for the HTRB. (7) Statements of significant new findings. b. The records required by this regulation will be retained permanently under AR 340?-18-13. Such records will be reasonably accessible for inspection and copying by authorized DA personnel and representatives of the Federal Food Drug Administration. 5-3 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24, February 1984 USAINSCOM Regulation. 15-?3 APPENDIX A TERMS AND A13BRE'VIATIONS Section I - Terms A-l. Approving official. The INSCOM Commanding General, Deputy Commander, In- tel.ligence,Deputy C,or~nder, Supaort, or higher level official, who has been delegated authority to approve the use of human subjects in research. A-2. Associate investigator. A Der-ion who may be deeply involved in the exe-- cution of research but_..does.not have overall primary responsibility. . A-3. Consent. The legally effective agreement to take part as a human sub- ject. 'I"lze agreement may pertain to one's own participation or be in behalf of another person. Three terms associated wi,h this meaning that distinguish be- tween the' legal validity of such agreementq` are subject consent, permission, and assent. These terms are defined below. a. Subject consent. Agreement by an adult person who has autonomous legal capacity to consent-to taking part as a human subject. This form of con- sent peetains only to adults who have not lost their legal. ca)ac:Lty to consent. w b. Peraission.. Agreement by a "legally authorized representative " for taking part as a human subject of another person who does not possess autonc- rmous legal capacity to consent in his or, her own behalf. A legally authorized representative is a person or judicial body authorized under applicable law to grant permission (also known as third-party consent). c. Assent. The of fir?mative agreement to take part as a human subject by a person not possessing autonomous legal. capacity to consent In his or her own behalf, but who is capable of understanding what is proposed and able to ex- press an opinion as to willingness `to participate. Assent is concurrence in what is proposed, but is not a substitute for subject consent because, unlike consent, assent has no legal effect. A-4. Experimentation. Any research or testing activity involving human sub- jects that may expose such subjects to the possibility of permanent or tempor- ary injury (including physical or psychological. damage and damage to the repu- tation of such persons) beyond the -risks of injury, to which such subjects are ordinarily exposed in their daily lives. A-5. l;x eelned review procedures. Tone procedures used in research involving no more than minimal risk and those used for minor changes in approved investi- gations. These procedures minimize time. required for review. A-6. Health care practitioner. An individual trained to interact with pa- tients to provide diagnostic ;;r troatment procedures within established profes- sional standards. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 19S. A-7. Human subject:. Any person, whether or not such person is a US citizen, about whom an investigator conducting research., testing or studies obtains data through interaction with that person. Both physical procedures and manipula- tions of the subject or the subject's environment are included. Human subjects may be thought of as direct objects when the research is to determine the ef- fects of a now system on man (for example, the. psychological effects of a par- ticular interrogation technique on an indivicdual) or as indirect objects when a test is conducted to determine how man affects the ultimate performance of a system (doctrrine, concepts, training programs).. A-?8. Human Technology Review Board (1 .li) . A body set up to provide Initial and continuin revisor of re search involving t;Ie use of human subjects . HT'RS fulfills all. the functions of a human usse committee as described in AR 70-25. It is fundamentally similar to an Institutional Review Board (IRB) discussed in guidelines issued by the DHHS for human research, but has somewhat different authority as compared to an IRIS. Within DOD, authority to approve the use of human subjects in research is vested in commanders. In the INSCOM it is vested in the CG, and has been delegated to the DC(,-I and DCG-S for matters under their respective functional control. App?ovi.ng officials act on recommenda- tions of validly constituted HTR13s. Outside DOD, IRBS tend to he vested with this authority. A--9. i,e ally authorized representative. A person or judicial or other body authorized cinder applicable law to consent on behalf of a prospective subject to the sub jea.:t taking part in the procedures involved in the research. -lO. Medical monitor. This person is a m.i'P.itary or Department of the Army civilian phy"siclian tlwhcra is responsible for observing human subjects during the conduct of research. A- ll:. Minimal risk. When used in the c?ontne:xt. of this regulation, this means that the aisle ~waf Marra anticipated in the proposed research are not greater, considering probability and magnitude, than those ordinarily encountered in claily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological exam- L-12. Principal investigator. A. person, regardless of title, who is primarily responsible for--the--actual execution of the research. ,k-13. Protocol. The written., detailed plan by Stich research is to be con- ducted. 'Ihe plan contains, as a minimum, discussion of ...- a:a. The ob jectives' of the project. h. The information to be collected. c. The means by which it will be collected and evaluated. d. An assessment of potential risks and benefits to subjects. A- 2 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 214.February 1984 e. Safety measures. USAINSCOM Regulation 15--3 f. Other means to be used to reduce the risks to subjects. A-14. Research. A systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to general knowledge concerning military or intelligence problems. The term does not include individual or group training of personnel such as combat read-- iness, effectiveness, proficiency or fitness exercises. This definition is unique to this regulation and Is not :intended to identify an effort for funding under appropriations intended for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (11DTF). "Research" in the sense applied in this regulation will be funded Lording to the project, effort, etc., to which it applies. A-l5 Research and development. Any scientific inquiry, investigation, or ,ral1dation performed or directed to test hypotheses or develop concepts con- cern:iing physical or biological principals or laws. Research is a major explor- atlon of the unknown and contains unpredictable elements. Development usually is confined to the qualification or elaboration of known principals. A--16. Systematic investigation. A formal inquiry generally described in a protocol that sets forth explicit objectives and formal procedures designed to reach those objectives. The term includes clinical investigations, but does not include post-tra:Lningg or post-therapeutic inquuiries intended only to evalu- ate individual progress or responsiveness, to training or therapy. A-??17. Test and evaluation. An effort or assessment to. validate proposed or existing standards or concepts of performance, either of humans or of material. 14 A-18. Test participants. Humans directly involved in test and evaluations, but who are asst therselves the direct object of such activities. Generally, test participants are not regarded as receiving any direct benefits as a result of their participation in the test (for example, a new doctrine or training concept). A- Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 3. SAINSC0M Regulation 15-3 Section 11 -- Abbreviations Army Medical Department ___..___.____-____--_... US Army Research Institute for the DCSOPS_.-__-,._..,._ D 1115-.___. ~_...___.__ - -__ The. INSCOM Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel US Army Materiel DeveT..opment and Research Command 24 February -1984 - Department of the Army Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence Behavioral and Social Sciences The INSCON Center for Excellence Code of Federal Regulations Department of the Army The INSCO M Deputy Chief of Staff for Plans, Programs and Modernization The INSCO 1 Deputy Chief of Staff for l')perations Department of Health and Human Services The INSCOM High Performance Task Force (no longer constituted) The INSCOM Humans Technology Review Board --------------- 1113 Army Intelligence and Security Command Major Army command --_ The INSCOM Staff Judge Advocate --- The Surgeon General of the Array A-4 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24 February 1984 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 FORMAT FOR PREPkRATION OF A RESEARCH PROTOCOL, 1, Project title. (Enter complete project title - if this is an amendment to an existing pro jest? identify by indicating "Amendment No. to" immediately preceding the title). ' 2. Investigators. a. Principal investigator. (Enter full name, rank, title, organization and telephone number). b.' Associate "investigators. (Identify all associate investigators and area of. he projec -for which each is responsible. Include full name, rank, title, rganization and telephone number for each). 3. Location of the project. (Ident:ify all locations at which the project will be carried out and specify which portions will be done at each location and who is the point of contact at each location. Include telephone number for POC). 'If 4. Period covered by the project. (Giv month and year of expected start and completion dates). 5. Synopsis. a. (Enter a short, one-page or one-paragraph, summary of the proposed pro- ject, similar to the abstract of a scientific paper). b. (Enter a list and brief description of safety measures for human sub- jects involved in thew project). 6. Medical application. (Explain briefly the medical importance, including psychological considerations, and possible usefulness of the project), 7. Objectives. (State briefly but specifically the objectives'bf the pro- ject. Include items bt.low, where applicable). a. Study design. (Double-blind, crossover, etc.). Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 24 February 1984 b. Technologies to be employed. (List: tte generic technologies to be er, played in this project). c. Type'of population involved. (List the subject population to be ab-- served). 8. Status. (State what has been accomplished or published in the proposed area of study and describe how this project will relate to, differ from and/or advance that which has already. been accomplished). 9. Bibliography. (List all references used in preparing the protocol). 10. Authority. (Cite the specific authority for the INSCOM to engage in this project Indicate date of approval, and if not yet approved, indicate specifi.- approval authority needed for this project. --Identify any FOC in approval au- thority",s organization with whom coordination has been effected. 11. General approach. a. (Out:l.ine expected accomplishments in sufficient detail to show a clear course of action). b. (Include discussion of the technological validity of the proposed re- search procedures). c. (List the chronological steps to be taken). 12. Project _subjects. (Give as a minimum the information below). a. Number of subjects. (Indicate the total number of subjects expected to complete the,...study) -'-" b. Age range. c. Sex. d. Inclusion criteria. (State specific and detailed reasons for inclusio'-t of subjects by cuss, or individually, as appropriatee). e. Diagnostic criteria for entry. f. Evaluations before entry. (Include any physical or psychological exaRt-- inati.ons, medical history, etc., which Ls to be done on each subject hefar,, entry into the project). Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24 February 1934 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 g. Exclusion criteria. (Inc:Lud(:e a complete list detailing the subjects, diseases, medications, etc., which constitute the criteria for exclusion from the project). h.. Source of subjects. (Describe briefly where subjects will be ob- tained). i Subject identification. (Describe code system, if any, which will be used in the project)., Subject assessment. (Describe the methods used to assign or allocate the. object of this research to particular subjects). k. Risks and benefits. (Discuss the analysis of risks and benefits to subjects and to those conducting the research). 1. Minimization of rites. (Discuss the precautions to be taken to mini- mize or elimin=ate risks try sub j? ci a and those conducting the research). M. Corrective actions. (Describe hypothesized adverse reactions and cor- rective actions expected to be taken if such adverse reactions occur). ,'. Special equipment. (Describe any special medical or nursing care or equipment needed for subjects admitted to the project). 13. Project technologies. a. (State the complete name and deocription or all technologies to be used, including procedures for their application). b. (Identify the source of all technologies and related items, devices, et:c.. List all components and manufacturing and quality control plans/ procedures, where applicable). c. (Identify the methodology #o ,r application, if different from procedures described above). d. (State the schedule, administration and duration of each aspect of the project) . e. (Describe in detail accompanying devices amd their intended use. Ides- whether these are classified as medical devices and whether the medical devices amendment to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act applies). f. (Discuss labeling, to medical devices, where applicable). I'.. Evaluations made during, and following the T.-'rojecr. (A project schematic idy be included, or the items may `)e listed as indicated helow. In either c.r3.sse, it is important to identify the person who will perform each evaluation). Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 3SAI SCOM Regulation 15--3 a e Specimens to be collected. (1) Schedule of collections. (2) Evaluations to be made on specimens. 24 February l984 (3) Stora. (If applicable, state. where and if special conditicn.s are required.) (4) Labeling and disposition. (5) Laboratories performing evaluations. (6) Special ' precautions . b. Clinical/behavioral assessments. (Include how adverse effects are to be d. Follow--up procedures. e. Disposition of data. (State location and duration of storage. Include pertinent information' re.garding Privacy Act and AR 381--10 considerations, if applicable). f. Methods used for data collection. (State critical measurements used as end points~to ch ra3cterize cat ty, ofplc.rcy or equivalency),. 15. P =M a rt..are from protocol for individual subjects. a. When allowed. (Use flexible,, but definite criteria. If none is to be allowed, so'~; t'ate) . b. Who will_ be notified. (Include both those regarding the individuil. subject, if appropriate, and those elsewhere within the INSCOM. Must notify ,at least the HTRB). 16. Adverse reactions. (Must correlate with paragraph 12m? above). a. Definition of subject reactions. b. Immediate reporting procedures. c. Routine reporting procedures. d. Potential post-project adverse reactions. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 c. Vital signs. (State when desired and the frequency). Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24 Febr nary 1984 USAINSCOM Regulation 15-3 Section IV ADMINISTRATION 17. Modification of protocol. (Describe the procedure to be followed to mrodify, terminayte or extend Vthe protocol). T-8. Disposition of unused project material. (Give a statement pertaining to (di.sposition of unused project material and devices, if applicable). :19. Publications and reports. (Describe use, including potential restric?- - ttons, of information and publications and reports arising from they project). 20. Funding. (Identify source of funds and any special or unusual funding im- plications). 2.1. Medical monitor. (State the name area telephone number of medical monitor when applicable). 22.. Protocol reviews. (Identify the human use committee or institutional re- view board which will provide inirial, continued and annual review of this pro,.. tccol). (Signature) (Name, rangy and organix lion of person :submitting protocol) 4 (Signature) (Name, rank andW or aniz tion of prig cipal inv stigator (Signature) ___ (Name, rank and organization of approving official) Attachments A- Proposed Volunteer Agreement It - Proposed Explanation Portion of the Volunteer Agreement C - Review of Scientific and Human Research Issues (if applicable) 1) - Biographic Sketch of principal and associate investigators B-5 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 V 'Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 24 February 1984 TTCArTacr-nM hPPENDIX C VOLUNTEER AGREEMENT Part A I, ~l.tta) birthcday.,artd~ttt~erwis_c ;nythodology. Development of _i_CT,P personnel will be accomplished with special training based on mission requirements. c. (U) Assignments in ICLP are governed IV the sensitivity and degree of expertise r3quir.ec for the position. I w=ill, be assigned in accordance with ay capabilities and experience, regardless of m;; rank or previous position. Due to the nature of training involved, the duration of my participation is indefinito. Records of my involvement will be available to project personnel, but otherwise protected under project security measures. d. (U) The primary consideration in :ev1 career development or assignr?'.nt action will be ICLP mission and operational 4'equirernents. I understand that exemption, interruption, or delay in normal career development patterns--such r,s branch schooling and assignment opportunities--may prejudice future promotion rend assignment potential. I have been assured, however, that every effort will be made to preclude the adverse effects listed above on my cereer. 2. (S/CL-5/NOFORN) PSYCHOENERGETICS (PE) include various processes by which individuals psychically interact with objects, locations, and organisms. R. (u) There is no demonstrated risk of permanent or temporary injury (including, physical, psychological and/or damage to pnrticipants' reputation) to protect personnel beyond risks to which thcy would ordinarily; be exposed in their daily lives. b . (U) I may temporarily choose not 10 porfoum PR a t specific times, or permanently discont_inuc participation without prejudicial effect. WARNING NOTICE: CENTER LANE SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM RESTRICT DISSEMINATION TO THOSE WITH VERIFIED ACCESS CATEGOh'r CL-4 NOT FELEA;SEABLE TO FOREIGN :NATIONALS CLAS 1FIED BY: CDR, INUCOM MW OADR Approved For Release 2 / -00788ROO1500090010-7 R. E TT Approved For Release 2 &- P96-00788R001500090010-7 US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND CENTER LANE TRAINING AND APPLICATIONS PROCEDURES Psychological Test Descriptions Approved For Release 2004/07 ,(1 F2 gFq?7Q0788R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2004/07/09: CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Psychological Test Descriptions 1. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI): Developed by S. R. Hathaway, Ph.D., and J. C. McKinley, M.D., The Psychological. Corporation. The MMPI is designed to provide an objective assessment of some of the major personality characteristics that affect personal and social adjustment. The point of view determining the importance of a trait in this case is that of the clinical or personnel worker who wishes to assay those traits that are commonly characteristic of disabling psychological abnormality. The carefully constructed and cross-validated scales provide a means for measuring the personality status of literate adolescents and adults together with a basis for evaluating the acceptability and dependability of each test record. Nine scales were originally developed for clinical use of the inventory and were named for the abnormal. conditions on which their construction was based. The scales were not expected to measure pure traits nor to represent d=iscrete etiological or prognostic entities. Since they have been shown to have meaning within the normal range of behavior, these scales are now commonly referred to by their abbreviations--ils (hypochondriasis), D (depression), Hy (Hysteria), Pd (psychopathic deviate), Mf (masculinity- femininity), Pa (paranoia), Pt (Wsychasthenia), Sc (schizophrenia), and Ma (hypomania)--or by their code numbers to avoid possibly misleading connotations. Many other scales have subsequently been developed from the same items; Si (social introversion) is one that is commonly scored. There are also three validating scales: 1, (lie), F (validity), and K (correction.). 2. Gordon Personal Profile.,- Inventory (GPI): Developed by Leonard V. Gordon, Ph.D., The Psychological Corporation. The GPI is companion instrument to the Gordon Personal Profile (GPP). It measures four additional traits, namely Cautiousness (C), Original. Thinking (O), Personal Relations (P), and Vigor (V). The two instruments used together provide an economical coverage of eight important factors in the personality domain. Both have been found to be appropriate for use with high school, college, industrial, and general adult groups. 3. Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation - Behavior (FIRO - B): Developed by Will Schutz, Ph.D., Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. The fundamental interpersonal dimensions of the FIRO Theory are; Inclusion (I), Control (C), and Affection (A) and are defined behaviorally as follows: I - The interpersonal need for inclusion is the need to establish Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 uNPUL0,1FIEP ,~ r t Y^ a Approved For Release 2 and maintain a satisfactory relationship with people with respect to interaction and association (both positive or negative). C - The interpersonal need for control is the need to establish and maintain a satisfactory relationship with people with respect to control and power. A - The interpersonal. need for affection is the need to establish and maintain. a satisfactory relationship with others with respect to love and affection. 4. California Psychological Inventory (CPI) : Developed by Harrison C. Gough, Ph.D., Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. The CPI is intended primarily for use with "normal" (non-psychiatrically disturbed) subjects. Its scales are addressed to personality characteristics important for social living and social interaction, i.e., to variables that are woven into the fabric of everyday life. "Folk concepts" such as these are hypothesized to be relevant to the prediction and understanding of interpersonal behavior In any setting, culture, or circumstance. Thus, although the inventory has been found to have special. utility in work with particular kinds of problems, e.g., delinquent and asocial. behavior, it can also provide information of value in regard. to educational, vocational, familial, and many other issues. >. Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS): Developed by Allen L. Edwards, Ph.D., University of Washington. The EPPS was designed primarily as an instrument for research and counseling purposes, to provide quick and convenient measures of a number o relatively independent normal personality variables. The statements in the EPPS and the variables that these statements purport to measure have their origin ina list of. manifest needs presented by H. A. Murray and other noted psychologists. The names that have been assigned to the variables are those used by Murray. These 1.5 measurable personality variables are; achievement (ach), defere.nc.e (def), order (ord), exhibition (exh), autonomy (aut), a.ffIllation (aff), intraception (int), succorance (sue), dominance (dom), abasement (aba), nurturance (nur), change (chg), endurance (end), heterosexuality (het), and aggression (agg). In addition to the above 15 personality variables, the EPPS provides a measure of test consistency and a measure of profile stability. 6. Personal Orientation Inventory (P01): Developed by Everett L. Shostron, Ph.D., Educational. and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, California. The profile on the POI shows the degree to which the subject's attitudes and values compare with those of self--actualizing people. A self--actualizing person :is one who is more fully functioning and who lives a more enriched life than does the average person. Such a person is developing and utilizing his unique talents to the fullest extent. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 E3 -RDP96-00788ROO1500090010-7 UNCLAMFIED Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22212 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN USA INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND AND THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY SUBJECT: Transfer of the INSCOM CENTER LANE Project to DIA (S/CL-2/NOFORN) :l. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) PURPOSE. This Memorandum of Agreement is intended to clarify the elements necessary for an effective transfer of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command (USAINSCOM) psychoenergetic intelligence collection capability to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). This course of action is based on an agreement by DIA to accept the INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (ICLP) as a "package-deal" without a loss of any INSCOM personnel spaces. It is intended that the transfer will take place with minimum disruption to operations and training. 2. (U) REFERENCES. a.. (U) Memorandum, IACG, INSCOM, dtd 17 July 1984; subject: INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (U) (TAB A). b. (U) Memorandum, DAMI-ISH, OACSI, dtd. 1 August 1984; subject: CENTER LANE (U)--ACTION MEMORANDUM (U) (TAB B). c. (U) Ltr, DAMI-ISH, OACSI, dtd 10 September 1984, subject: INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (TAB C). d. (S/NOFORN) Memorandum of Agreement, DIA, dtd 17 August 1984, subject: "Operating rationale and terms of agreement for the participants in DoD psychoenergetics activities" (TAB D). 4RARNING NOTICE: CENTER LANE SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM RESTRICT DISSEMINATT01 {Y TI1OSE WITII VERIFIED ACCESS To CATEGORY THREE (3) SENSITIVE INTI-LLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS CLASSIFIED BY: CDR, INSCOM DECLASSIFY ON: OADR Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Releas Q: I DP96-00788R001500090010-7 IACG SUBJECT: Transfer of the INSCOM CENTER LANE Project to DIA (S/CL-2/NOFORN) 3. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) BACKGROUND. USAINSCOM has invested considerable effort since 1977 in developing psychoenergetic operational methods. Intelligence consumers in the US Army, US Air Force, DIA, NSA, CIA, and NSC have all tasked this methodology to augment other intelligence systems. These agencies have recognized the value and potential of the intelligence application of psychoenergetics; it is likely they will continue to task the system. The transfer of ICLP capability to DIA must be done in such a way as to maintain continuity and momentum of effort, as well as the state-of-the-art expertise exclusive to this time-proven, highly respected activity. 4. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) SCOPE. The effective transfer of ICLP to DIA requires the cooperation of INSCOM, DA (ACSI), and DIA. 5. (S/CL-3/NOFORN)) AGREEMENTS, SUPPORT, AND RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS. The "package deal" concept has been agreed to in principle by all parties involved. This concept has as its intent the transfer of all personnel, documents, equipment, and office space from INSCOM to DIA. The transfer of ICLP personnel to DIA will not involve the transfer of any INSCOM spaces. ICLP has been an active intelligence collection unit since 1978. It is intended that the unit will. remain an operational element under the direct OPCON of the Assistant Vice Director for Scientific and Technical Intelligence (DT), DIA. a.. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Personnel. All personnel assigned to INSCOM and working on ICLP will be encouraged to PCS to DIA for assignment to the DIA element that will perform the psychoenergetic training and collection mission. (Operational participation with CENTER LANE is strictly voluntary and falls under the guidelines of DoD directive 5240.1-R, AR 381-10, and Code of Federal Regulation, Title 45, part 46.) h. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Documents. All documents maintained by ICLP will be transferred to, and become the property and responsibility of, DIA. INSCOM will be permitted to retain access to command and control and historical ICLP documents. c. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Equipment. All ICLP equipment, rental agreements, and on hand supplies will be transferred to DIA. ICLP automatic data processing equipment and automobiles will remain with INSCOM. d. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Office Space. The affected agencies have agreed that the best course of action would be to continue to use the ICLP facilities at Ft. Meade, MD, which consists of two buildings, T-2560 and T-2561. Use of the Ft. Meade facility will provide the least amount of turmoil for the personnel involved, Approved For Release 200.4/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Release 2 / . REPT6-00788ROO1500090010-7 I ACG SUBJECT: Transfer of the INSCOM CENTER LANE Project to DIA (S/CL-2/NOFORN) permit continued operations and training with the least amount of disruption, and permit the best use of these buildings, which over the years have been modified to support this unique activity. Coordination with post authorities must be initiated to assign buildings T-2560 and T-2561 to DIA. 6. (U) RESPONSIBILITIES. USAINSCOM ICLP Project Manager will: a. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Function as INSCOM POC for transfer of ICLP to DIA. b. (S/NOFORN) Coordinate for use or transfer of present ICLP physical facilities (bldgs. T-2560 and T-2561). c. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Coordinate transfer of ICLP equipment, contracts and rental agreements from INSCOM to DIA. d.. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Coordinate the transfer of all ICLP personnel to DIA. Counsel all ICLP personnel concerning the transfer and insure ICLP personnel are aware that they will be performing operational remote viewing at DIA. e. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Coordinate for transfer of all relevant documents maintained by ICLP to DIA. 7. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) EFFECTIVE DATE. ICLP is scheduled to cease operations on or about 30 September 1984, at which time it will be available for transfer to DIA. It is expected that the transfer will be completed by 31 December 1984. Until completion of the transfer process ICLP will remain in its entirety within USAINSCOM. IIARR J MF7 . _'WTtLTAM Major General, USA Lieutenant General, USA Commanding Director Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 P"?" FT Approved For Release.2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 TAB E :1 Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Releaa /Q'T/ DP96-00788R001500090010-7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22212 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 32 FEB 1985 IACG SUBJECT: Memorandum of Agreement, Transfer of INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (ICLP) to DIA (S/NOFORN) HQDA ATTN: DAMI-ZA Washington, D.C. 20310-1001 1. (S/NOFORN) Reference: Letter, INSCOM, IAGPA-F-SD, 21 December 1984, subject: Transfer of CENTER LANE to DIA (S/CL-2/NOFORN) (Incl 1) 2. (S/NOFORN) Attached is the proposed INSCOM/DIA Memorandum of Agreement for the pending assumption of operational control of ICLP by the Defense Intelligence Agency. 3. (U) Request your review of attached MOA. 4. (U) Upon your approval, the MOA will be transmitted to DIA for their review and approval. Anticipated effective date for attachment of ICLP to DIA is 15 February 1985. c L as Maj r General, USA Commanding l ` I RWV E. SOYST 2 I CLASSIFIED BY: CG, INSCOM DECLAS: OADR !dsLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2004/07/09: CIA-RDP607888001500090010-7 SECREt Approved For Release ZEL Rr6.OO788ROOl5OOO9OOlO7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22212 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 21 December 1984 SUBJECT: Transfer of CENTER LANE to DIA (S/CL-2/NOFORN) HODA ATTN: DAMI-ZA Washington, D. C. 20310-1001 1. (U) DAMI-ISH Letter, 4 October 1984, subject: Memorandum of Agreement. (Incl 1) It - -~ 2. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Discussions with Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) management now indicate that DIA will not be able to accept the transfer of INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (ICLP) assets until FY 1.986. This is a result both of present Congressional restrictions on use of NFIP funding for psychoenergetic intelligence collection activities and a severe shortage of non-NFIP resources at DIA. DIA has requested operational control (OPCON) of ICLP as an interim measure, and has agreed to accept all command and control responsibility and liability for ICLP until such a time as Congress approves use of NFIP Hinds for psychoenergetic-related activities (expected no later than the first quarter of FY 86). 3. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Based on the above, CG, IJSAINSCOM, has determined that the best course of action to permit the continued use of ICLP technology is to place the Project under DIA's OPCON. The target date for the action is 31 January 1.985, which allows necessary time to accomplish preparation and staffing of a new Approved For Release 2004/07/09: CIA-R[.Q?%--00788 R001500090010-7 IV,J1 Approved For Release 200P0.ifF19IRDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 IAGPA-F-SD 21 December 1984 SUBJECT: Transfer of CENTER LANE to DIA (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Memorandum of Agreement delineating the responsibilities of both parties. 'Ili. period of the OPCON will not exceed one calendar year. 4. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) DIA has agreed to officially notify Congress of their assumption of responsibility for CENTER LANE. 5. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) The MOA will be forwarded to your office prior to submissi to DIA. Additionally, in a separate action, CENTER LANE will be disestablished..,_ as a Department of the Army Special Access Program (SAP). ACSI will be notified' when this is fully accomplished. RARRJ E. SO TER Majo?t General, USA a Commanding. Approved For Release 2004/07/09 CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 4 ? Y ~ Approved For Release 200 ~ L, ` P96-007888001500090010-7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF FOR INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20390 REPLY TO .ATYENT1OU OP SUBJECT. Memorandum of Agreement (U) Comm and e r USA Intelligence and Security Command Arlington Hall Station Arlington, VA 22212 1. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Reference memorandum, INSCOM, I.ACC, 26 Sep 84, subject: Memorandum of Agreement, Transfer of INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (ICLP) to DIA (S/ CL-.2 /NOFORN) . 2. (U) Reference proposed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is approved. 3. (S/CL--2/INNOFORN) Request you consider the inclusion of some detail on the procedure to be followed in transferring personnel to DIA. INSCOM may detail the individuals involved for up to one year to allow time for DIA to identify spaces. Once such spaces are available, the detailed persopnel may be ;riven a Permanent Change of Station. If DIA desires a change in authorized strength to allow for immediate PCS reassignment, they may apply for it through JCS. OACSI, DA will support such a change in status if the subject becomes an issue. 4 OCT /11LIAM E. ODOM U Utenant s,rgil, USA Classified by Cdr, INSCOM. Declassify on. OADR CE NTEft?t~ 411 RO Release 2004/0 NOT Ric-LEASABLE TO F , QfON NATIONALS -00788R0015000900v0- CLOSE HOLD/HAND CARRY Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 TAB Approved For Release 2004/07/09 : CIA-RDP96-00788 R001500090010-7 Approved For Relea rMIA<9:~A B8ROO1500090010-7 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22212 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Deactivation of INSCOM CENTER LANE Project (ICLP) as a Special Access Program (SAP) (U) HIODA ATTN: DAM I - 7 A Washington, D.C. 20310-1001 1. (S/NOFORN) This letter serves to notify you of the deactivation of the INSCOM CENTER LANE Project, the attachment OPCON of CENTER LANE assets and resources to the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the retirement of CENTER LANE as an active project nickname, effective as of the date of this letter. 2, (U) Request that the necessary actions be taken to officially discontinue, CENTER LANE as a Secretary of the Army designated Special Access Program. 0 HARRY E. SOYSTER Major-General, USA Commanding CLASSIFIED BY: CG, INSCOM DECLAS : BADR Approved For Release 00788 R001500090010-7 some E C rl, * %q t. T