Approved For Release 2000/08/07 00788ROO0200440001-2 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS -7 ORCON INSCOM GRILL FLAME PROGRAM SESSION REPORT CLASSIFIED BY: MSG, DAMI-ISH 051630Z JUL 78 REVIEW ON GRILL FLAME Approved For Release 20001OWW P96-00788ROO0200440001-2 E M, f r Approved For Release 2000/08/"ft 0% lIP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 , ax-EUR10- SUMMARY ANALYSIS REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION CD-42 1. (S) This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in compliance with a request for information on a target of interest to USI. The purpose of this session was to describe an area designated by geographic coordinates. 2. (S) The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document GRILL FLAME Protocolq AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated. 3. (5) At TAB A is a summary of the data presented by the remote viewer during the session. A complete transcript of the session is available upon request. At TAB B are drawings made by the remote viewer reference his impressions of the target site. At TAB C is target cuing information provided the remote viewer. At TAB D is Memorandum for the Record. 4. (S) The summary at TAB A represents the salient points provided by the remote viewer, and, as such, has not been subjected to any intermediate analysis, evaluation or collation. Interpretation and use of the informa- tion provided is the responsibility of the requestor. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS S JE I C , RE T 11 June 1960 REPORT #CD-421 10 June 1980 SG1A SG1A SUBJECT: 1. (UY,"'REFERENCE:,.l-Repott.#PD-40,1.~6 June 1980.~ 2. (S/NOFORN) Source observed several structures which he described as follows: a. (S/NOFORN) A building resembling a lot of long peaked-roofed buildings standing side-by-side and attached to each other. The roof of this building had a linear structure on its roof which resembled a "fire-stop." Source referred to this building "multi-gabled" and "multi-roofed.,, (See item 1~ Inclosure 1.) b. (S/NOFORN) Source observed what appeared to be metal "junk" or parts of old machines laying around outside the building in an (apparent) disorderly fashion. c. (S/NOFORN) Source reported that this building appeared to have concrete (sk:irting) around it,and between it and a second building opposite. (See item 2, Inclosure 1.) d. (S/NOFORN) Source described this second building as appearing to be single story, of metal construction, and of a length 3-4 times greater than its width. (item 2, Inclosure 1.) e. (S/NOFORN) Source observed that across an undetermined distance to the (apparent) rear of the multi-gabled building was a fence and a road, on the other side of which was a multi-dished antenna. (See Inclosure 1.) f. (S/NOFORN) To the right of the multi-gabled building was an object which appeared to be a bulk liquid-type storage tank. To the lower right was a tower. The distance between the tower and the multi-gabled building was approximately 200 yards. (See Inclosure 1.) g. (S/NOFORN) A "few hundred yards" in what appeared to be a north-west direction was the believed location of a similar multi-gabled building which was reported in report CD-40. (See arrow, Inclosure 1.) 3. (S/NOFORN) Source described interior portions of the two structures (item 1 and 2, Inclosure 1) as follows: a. (S/NOFORN) The multi-gabled building consisted essentially of an "open shell" having "open bays" inside, light emanating from near the roof as though there were windows in the roof. Source said that rows of interior steel posts support the roof, and that the building appeared uninsulated. In one end CLASSIFIED BY:MSG,DAMI-ISH DATED: 051630ZJUL78 REVIEW ON: June 2000 Approved For Release 2000/M -0 0 7 ~RJ1QJ44]56JJAM E~ . 'RErDP96 6." /Y Approved For Release 2000/08/0&rCi&ItBP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 OLUIlL I of the structure was a "big fire pit" or "forge" of approximately 201 to 301 by 101 to 151 dimensions which source thought to be coal fired. At the opposite end of the building was a pool of (apparent) water on the floor and a.truck-type vehicle nearby which appeared to have been recently washed. Source said it appeared as though vehicles could "drive through" the building in a direction perpendicular to its long axis. (See Inclo- sure 2.) b. (SAOFORN) Source observed "all kind&of equipidient" within the multi-gabled building, some of which was alike, but most of which was different. Source observed carts and overhead hoists within the building, as well as "trucks" and "different vehicles" which appeared to be heavy equipment. c. (SAOFORN) Source reported the interior of the metal building (item 2, Inclosure 1) to consist essentially of rooms at one end, and to have a large.steel container "bigger than a truck" (see Inclosure 3) inside. Source observed large doors on the large steel container which appeared to have "dogs" thereon (as if) the container could be made air-or liquid-tight. Source reported the container extended (approximately) two/thirds the height to the interior roof-line of the building, and to be of the dimensions 81 to 101 long, 81 to 101 wide, and 101 to 121 in height., 4. (SAOFORN) Source had opportunity to re-observe that area of the installation which (appeared) to be that area described in Report #CD-40. Source's description of this area, which (appeared) to be "a few hundred yards" to the northwest of the area shown at Inc&osure 19 is shown at Inclosure 49 and was described by Source as follows: a. (S/NOFORN) Source observed that some of the truck-type vehicles which (had been) parked outside the "old" building were gone, and that only three to four remained. Source explained that the "old" building (see Inclosure 4) was that which he had described earlier as the "saw-toothed building" in Report CD-40. Source explained that this building is similar in structure and construction to that described as the "multi-gabled" building in paragraph 2a~ above. b. (SAOFORN) Source reported that "one or two each of quite a few things" (equipment).were located in this "old" building, and that the equipment appeared "brand, spanking new." Source further explained that the equipment appeared as though it had not been field abused. c. (S/NOFORN) Source observed the following equipment within the "old" building: (see Inclosures 5 thru 7) (1) (SAOFORN) A vehicle with sloping frontal "'bow" and three or four wheels on each side which reminded Source of an old US "Duck" type vehicle. Only a small portion of this vehicle was observable. NWWWK 2 Approved For Release 2000/ JE! C =T_ -00788ROO0200440001-2 7:7,777, UMT WKT-r_ '-"j Approved For Release 2000/ng/n7 ;4&;;W96-00788ROO0200440001-2 (2) (S/NOFORN) A vehicle described as a,mobile anti-aircraft gun having a tracked chassis, radar dish, and "small calibers" (guns) on top. Source did not recall the exact number of guns, but stated it "may have been 3 or 4.11 M (S/NOFORN) Source observed a vehicle which appeared to be an SP gun of unknown type. Source stated the gun tube on this equipment appeared to be shorter and thicker than that which he would expect to see~on a tank, that the"turret" area appeared more vertical and angular than a tank's more rounded turret, and that he could not observe any "gap" between the hull and turret which would.indicate the turret was moveable. Source said the turret appeared "fixed," unlike that of a tank. Source also stated this SP gun was "dust covered" as-though it had been sitting a long time. (4) (S/NOFORN) Source observed a "truck that didn't look like a truck" (see Inclosure 6). Source stated this vehicle appeared very large, was of approximately 151 height, had a-"cab over engine" configuration and "very big wheels." (5) (S/NOFORN) Source observed a tracked rocket launcher (Inclosure 7) having racks on its back, the front of which looked more like a truck than a "track," (meaning tracked vehicle) and which had racks mounted over/in an open compartment in its rear*i (6) (S/NOFORN) Sourle also observed several "old" towed artillery ILI pieces of approximately 122mm1bore. These weapons (appeared) to have "older" chassis components than theiritubesg implying the possibility the chassis served as a "modified test bed" for a gun tube which was different than normal. (7) (S/NOFORN) Source observed 5 to 8 tanks of various types, sizes, and configuration in various !states of disassembly. Source observed some (tanks) with turrets off,.some (tanks) with tracks off and laying haphazardly aside, and (at least) one tank without (its) engine. Source described these tanks as not being very neatly arranged within the building; their arrangement (lack of orderliness) implying the area of the building to be not concerned with production or unit equipment maintenance, but rather test/evaluation or research. Source stated thelparticular flavor of equipment "sitting around" with components removed.did not resemble the~'Imethodology of a production line" or the "discipline" of a troop unit. (8) (S/NOFORN) Source stated it appeared as though "new" projects entering the building would cause the delay or "putting aside" of ongoing projects in order to work on'Ithe one (project) with the shortest.deadline. I d. (S/NOFORN) Source 4tated the interior of the "new" building (located to the left of "old" building, inclosure 4) consisted of offices and laboratory- type shops having (undescribed) machinery in them. 3 r ~7% Approved For Release 2nn& ih4 mr%096-00788ROO0200440001-2 IDUi 1~~ 3rv Jr Approved For Release 2000/018&'-mffP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 SG1A 5. (U) COMMENT: a. (S/NOFORN) Preliminary eval indic te a licabilit to a section of subject facility located b. (U) Request informal evaluation and comments be provided NLT 20 June-1980. 7 Incl KENNETH V. BELL as Captaint MI Analyst 4 Approved For Release 200010q -00788R000200440001-2 ffDP96 Cft 1,44 )proved Fof Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 VN Qe PO pod Nit.. ism :0 14 00 4% .00 Ilk AVE Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Jj lqz t.,q I I:k !~j < 7=.. C>, Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 k", CN V\ Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 1~ I-- Approved For Release 2000/08/0 -00788R000200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 I Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 2!c-, ... i%mwor "M t - Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 -ftm./ Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/ DP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 TARGET CUING INFORMATION REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION CD-42 Project: 8003b Session CD-42 100900 hrs, 10 June 1980 1. CUING DATA: (Provided to viewer.) .Geographic coordinate SG1A 2. EEI: (Provided to interviewer) a. Description of area. b. What is the function of the target? c. What is presently the most important aspect of (each) target? Approved For Release 2000/OK. n'.R'I'IDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CKI, NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS i%wope, MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 10 June 1980 SUBJECT: Session CD-42 Cuing Data SG1A SG1A 1. (S/NOFnRN) This ii/Rq #71s third session against Project 8003b Previous Project 8003b sessions employing ipl were ULLYb ana UU-4U. a. (S/NOFORN) Identical coordinates were provided for both previous sessions. owever, appeare from a review of session CD-40 that #7 did not return to the location of session CCC-98, but, rather, had accessed some other target relevant area of the overall target installation. A GRILL FLAME analyst review indicated that #7 may have keyed on the location of target relevant equipment rather than the coordinates which were provided. This was indicated by the fact that target related equipment was reported by V, but at another location which appeared to resemble a second suspected equipment storage area within ver;1l installation. Therefore, it was decided to attempt to validate session CD-40's results by directing this session (CD-42) against a new set of coordi- nates which corresponded to the suspected CD-40 location. SG1A b. (S NOFORN was ro ided onl the following coordinates at start of session: 2. (S/NOFORN) #66 had performed as interviewer in 16 preceding sessions involving Project 8003; two of which (CCC-98 and CD-40) involved Project B003b and V. #66 was aware that session CD-40 had not hit the exact target area, but was suspected of having accessed the target vicinity at a location other than that actually intended. #66 was aware that the use of "new" coordinates was intended to validate the results of session CD-40, and could extrapolate, therefore, that if the analyst's estimate was correct, imagery similar to that received during CD-40 should logically be acquired during session CD-42. Due to #66's previous involvement in all Project 8003 sessions, most importantly sessions CCC-96 and CD-40, #66 was aware of the general nature of the target equipment as well as the gestalt natures of the geo- graphies of the target areas themselves. ft% --.t RDP96-00788ROO0200440001-2 Approved For Release 2000*