IAFM-OPS-I]U-SA NOT RELEASEP--%-tE,~"Ti~rf;f",Lw-~; tN`3 IONALS T, For Release 2000/08/07: 161A`-RD1 X10200560001-9 ORCON DEPARTMENTOF THE ARMY US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755 18 April 1980 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SGIA SUBJECT: i. (u) The following information applies: a. (S/NOFORN) An interior portion of an unidentified clear-story type structure (Inclosure 1) corresponds to Inclosure 2, this Memo. This portion of the structure is reported as being an assembly line area and is further described below. (1) (S/NOFORN) Source reported the criterior "wings" of the clear-story structure consist of work bays containing machinery and tools. (2) (S/NOFORN) Source reported that down the (apparent) centerline of the structure is a slow moving conveyor.-type of apparatus along which (apparent) vphicles are moved during assembly. (3) (S/NOFORN) Along each side of the convoyor-type apparatus are located work tables separated by (apparent)work space. (4) (S/NOFORN) Hanging down From above throughout the interior are hoses and similar type apparatus. (5) (S/NOFORN) Source reported that located to the left of the conveyor-type apparatus, near the end of thO unidentified structure, was an open garage-type doort to the left of which was a large cradle-type apparatus (Inclosure 3). (6) (S/NOFORN) To the left of the cradle apparatus was a small interior bUilding and parked vehicle (Inclosure 3). (7) (S/NOFORN) The apparent end of the structure had two large garage type doors, one of which was open and the other closed (Inclosure 3). CLASSIFIED BY: MSG, HOPIk(DAMI-ISH) dtd 05163OZ JUL 78 REVIEW ON: 13 April 2000 Approved For Release 2000/08/0T*G1A~RQP 510PTUR000200560001-9 SG1A Approved For Release 2000108107 : CIA7RDP96-00788ROO0200560001-9 TAFM--GPS SUBJECT: b. (SP40FORIN) The activity within the unidentified building on or about ,15 April 1980 is reported as foliows. (1) (SADFORN) Source reported that located -on the conveyor type apparatus was a vehicle resembling that at Inclosure 4. This vehicle was being wurked on by personnel standing on either side of the conveyor. These personne'l Would irregularly move between the (apparent) outer machinery bays and the conveyor type apparatus. (2) (5/NOFORN) Source reported:that standing near the small interior bt.iilding, and in fvent of the open garage type door, wao a vehicle rese~tnbling that at Inclosure 4. It was reported that the. vehicle c -i _2L,j to have beei completed, and was stanckIng near a quality control/inspection point shown at Inclosure 5. (3) (S/NOFORN) A forklift type vehicle was reported as moving through the open garage door on the left (apparently) retr-leving and moving pieces or parts from racks outside the Wilding into the interior of' the building. c. (S/NOFORN) Other data is reported as follows: Source's estimate/ appraisal is that the ve-hicle/equipment assembly is finalized or completed at this reported location. 2. Comments: Request informal evaluation of data contained herein be provided NLT 1.5 JUne 1980. 4 Incl V KENNETH V. BELL, JR. as Captain, M! Action Officer Approved For Release 2000108107 CIA-RI)P96-00788ROO0200560001-9 Approved For Release 2000 8 RO 60-2 -0 0-5 6 0 OD 1F--9 d For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200560001-9 00a Ov 0 c1cr OAV., QL Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200560001-9 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-0018~QE(QQQ200560001-9 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200560001-9 I- . I I JAL I Q 9!& V (9 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-k'n'P'991-'bO~7A88ROO0200560001-9 IAOPS-H-S- SUBJECT: INTERIM RESPONSE (U) . The information provided as an enclosure to this report was obtained in direct response to a collection requirement provided by your office. The information is from an unconfirmed source, therefore caution is war- ranted in its use. The material which you will now review has been ac- quired from a totally new and potentially valuable source of intelligence. Work is currently being conducted to establish ways by which to improve the accuracy and reliability of the data. Your attention to a preliminary evaluation, and later a final evaluation, will be the basis for our assess- ment of this new collection technique. In addition, your comments provide impetus upon which approach modification can be predicated for data collect- ion against the same or any additional targets for which you may have an interest. The effort you expend will greatly assist us and will ultimately result in your receiving more information of increasing accuracy and re- liability. While formulating your judgements concerning the information provided, the following comments concerning this new source of intelligence may be helpful. Foremost, the information is likely to consist of a mixture of both correct and incorrect elements. Specifically: The descriptive elements are generally of a higher reliability than judge- ments or labels as to what is being described by the source (a recreational swimming pool may be mistaken for a water purification pool, or an aircraft hull may be mistaken for a submarine hull, etc.) Therefore, seemingly approp- riate descriptive elements should not be rejected because they have been mis- lableled. The data will often contain gaps (in a three building complex for ex- ample, only two buildings may be described 'orIan airfield may be added which is not there.) Such gaps or additions should not be taken to mean that the rest of the information provided is necessarily inaccurate. Some of the data provided may be abstract with no apparent importance concerning the target. However, when considered in light of additional in- formation provided or obtained at a later date, may then be considered of high intelligence value. (i.e., lack of personnel within a 24 hour operations area on a given time and date, which is later confirmed to coincide with a fire evacuation demonstration.) Therefore, a recommended approach is to first examine the information pro- vided and to answer the questions as best you can (hence this interim response), in order to provide us with sufficient feedback to continue our support with the best methods Possible. Later, when the project has been terminated against that specific target, our office will provide you with a more detailed format wherein a full evaluation of all the information provided can be accomplished. If you have any questions regarding the data you have received, or its interim evaluation, please contact this office (IAOPS-H-S) at any time. CLASSIFIED BY: MSG, HQDA (DAMI-ISH) Dtd; 05163OZ JUL 78 REVIEW BY: NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : C14 ... 20056Q0;" TLL F LAME Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : QIA-.RDP96-'P§788ROO0200560001-9 Boxes are provided to the right of each question. Only one box should be checked for each question asked. If you have any comments which you would like to make emphasizing the accuracy of the information or with reference to any information not generally covered in this formatv pleasewrite them on the reverse of this page. Response to Tasking Responses* Does information provided satisfy your intelligence collection require- ment? 13 YES IN PART U NO Accuracy Geographical location (terrain, water, river, etc.) [3 YES IN PART t3 NO 13 Large scale man-made objects (docks, silos, buildings, etc.) Small scale man-made objects (tanks, computers, antennas, etc.) Target ambience (researchg production, administration, troop movement, etc.) Activity (nuclear testing, CBR, SIGINT monitoring, etc.) Personality (Physical, plans, actions, traits, etc.) Utility Please check which best describes the utility of the information provided (in view of what is known at this time, un- derstanding that additional information could raise or lower such an interim ass- essment at a later date) YES IN PART 13 NO 13 13 YES IN PART 13 NO E3 13 YES IN PART E) NO (3 [3 YES IN PART 13 NO 13 C3 YES IN PART 13 NO G 13 VERY USEFUL t3 USEFUL MARGINAL 13 NONE CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME *YES - indicates a full agreement with what is known to be fact about the target. NO - indicates a total lack of agreement with what is known to be fact about the target. 77 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : ql~A~-RDP96-10.0788ROO0200560001-9 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CWRD1396~b67AR060200560001-9 Additional taskin Is additional tasking required? C1 YES 13 NO (If yes~ please write what that tasking is on the back of the form) Did the attached information add to 13 YES Q NO information derived from other intell- igence sources? Did the attached information aid in tasking C3 YES 13 No other intelligence resources by providing targeting information? Signed) SIGNATURE (Printed) NAME, GRADE (Printed) TITLE, or OFFICE Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00t88R000200560001_'9 SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ~A.TION FORM Approved For Release 2000/(8/07 : CIA-RDP e 1 CUSTOMER OFFICE . 2. INFORMATION RUQUESI[t) DArL YEAR MONTH DAY - 3. TARGET COUNTRIES 4. PROJECT 5. SOURCE NUMBER NUMBER 1 6. NUMBER REPORTS SUBMITTED 7. REPORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS FOR PROJECT 8. REFERENCES 9. REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one.) A. REQUIRIMENTS (C-ETI.) 0 A. ICR RESPONSE (ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/D1Rff-'9) 0 B. COLLECTORS NFQUEST 0 B. INITIATIVE REPORT 0 C. SELECTED BY ANALYST 10. 7LIE OF W-OrOIATION (scloct,one) 11. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION 0 A. OF MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE B. OF VALUE 0 A. BASIC INTELLIGENCE C. OF NO VALUE E3 R. CURRENT INTELLIGENCE Ej C. ESTIMATIVE INTELLIGENCE [3 1). 5&T INTELLIGENCE 1.2.REASON INFORMA]ION 1") VALUE- 13. DEGREE OF NO OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION (select one only) (select one only) E3 A. TOO FRAGMLNIARY J_-3 A. COMPLETELY SATISFIED 0 B. DUPLICAIIVE j0 B. PARTIALLY SATISFIED M C. UNTIMELY 0 C. NOT SATISFIED AT ALL 1). NOT RESPONSIVE TO TASKING CITED L 14. NAME, OF PRODUCT(S) 15. COLLECTION GUIDANCE (Mandatory unless 13A, above, is checked) 16. REMARKS (Optional) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROOO 0560001-9 f wp (11 Aq(~TI-TrAFTnm SECURITY CLASSIFICATTOT A d For Release 2000/0 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0200560001-9 3/07 PIP"Po T (remarko continued) 17. FOREIGN DISCLOSURE DATA A. EVALUATORS RECOMMENDATION B. FOREIGN DISCLOSURE AUTHORITY DECISION (select one only) (select one only) [3 RELEASABLE EVALUATION REQUESTEDE3 EVALUATION NOT IS NOT RELEASABLE EVALUATION IS NOT RELEASAB LE E3 NON-CAVEATED PORTIONS OF THIS EVAL, AS PARA(S) ABOVE, IS/ARE INDICATED, MAY BE REL TO THE AUTH REPS RELEASABLE TO GOVT(S) 017 OF THE GOVT'(S) OF AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ORIGINATOR. 18. EVALUATOR'S NAME 19.EVALUATOR'S OFFICE20. SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS SYMBOL (DOWNGRADINGt DECLASSIFICATION, AND SPECIAL MARKINGS) 21. DATL EVALUATED 22.OR I G --0-F-RL-Q7Uj7=I INA T NFORMAT Oil WN YEAR MONTH DAY (Signatureof evaluator) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788RO)0200560001-9 51:('tJRTTY ULA~11f-'ICAT-I--ON