Approved For Release 2000/08/0s.MT96-00788ROO0300100002-7
 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
 US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND
 ~N, FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755
 SUBJECT: Evaluation of Project 8016 (U)
 Commander
 INSCOM
 ATTN: IAFM-OPS-HU-SA
 Ft Meade, MD 20755
 1. (U) Comments concerning CD-17, 199 22 and 38 are attached as inclosure 1.
 2. (S) In general, the results of this project are inconclusive due to
 difficulty in establishing detailed locations of subject after the fact.
 Recommend that this project, therefore, be terminated. Further, recommend
 that if this line of endeavor is continued, an impersonal subject be chosen
 as the target, and that the time of sessions be coordinated in advance to
 insure accurate data is available for evaluation of reports.
                               e, -
 Z~J . ~ ~NNEN~~~
 1 Incl J. R. NNEN
                              LT
 as LTCt MI
 Commanding
 Co
                        S
 Approved For Release 2000/08/g, - q,%-RRfAJM?"R000300100002-7
 pot 1-1 - - Ln

   ng
        Approved For Release 2()00/08iWt.,UvitnVruo-00788ROO0300100002-7
   SGFOIA3
      l.. (S) Subject: Summary of Unconfirmed Source Information Pertaining to
   (S) Project 8016-CD 17
        a. Of the thpee initial reports which vere reviewed, this one had the most
   promise. Although the information contained in each paragraph was considered
   highly probable, it can not be confirmed at this time because the Subject was on
   travel SGFOIA3 SGFOIA3
        b. The source of this investigation on~ ~should be encouraged to
   continue because there are a good deal of accurate comments which were made by
   him.
        c. In the future, the date and time of the session should be a part of the
   report. Without this information, it is virtually impossible to assess the
   information.
       2. (S) Subject: Summar of Unconfirmed Source Information Pertaining to
   SGF01A (S), Project 8016-CD 19.
        a. The only part of this report which had any possibilities was the
   information provided in para 1.c. Asside from that, nothing else was felt to be
   accurate.
        b. Again, Subject was on travel during this period which makes assessment
   very difficult.
   c. The information in paragraph l.c. above applies.
       3. (5) Subject: Summary of Unconfirmed Source Information Pertaining to
   SGFOIA'.': Project 8016-CD 22
   a. It is felt that nothing in this report is accurate.
        b. Subject was on travel during this session; therefore, information can not
   be confirmed at this time.
   c. Information in paragraph Lc above again applies.
        4. (S) Subject: Summary Analysis and Transcript of RV Session CD-38, Project 6016.
   a. This information showed some promise, but once again is difficult to
   evaluate the accuracy of physical details because Subject was in a travel
   status at that time.
        b. On page 2 of transcript, the area of expertise being described as "scientific"
   was basically accurate~ and the interviewer encouraged/prompted viewer to continue
   along this line. (Whether interviewer unduly incouraged viewer is debatable.)
   However, the trail then led to "electronics" which is not accurate.
        c. Page 3 of transcript is accurate in that area of concern is the upgrading
   of the "state of the art" but it does not pertain to electronics' i.e. "electricity"
   and "red light" are not in area of interest.
                  or -v%rr
   Fd R- .
   WW, HULA
                    Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA- D -7
   xox aLFASABLETOF qP&MJZ000300100002
   O%IPGP