Approved For Release 2000/08/01 -%f%f788ROO0500330001 -1 INSCOM GRILL FLAME PROGRAM SESSION REPORT NOT RELEASABLE Approved For Release 2000/08/0f CLASSIFIED BY:MSG,DAMI-ISH DATED: 051630ZJUL78 TO FOREIGN NATIONALS REVIEW ON: ~~' VA-RDP96-00788 3 0 Mtm NYC- 0617-S,/ T N Approved For Release 20QUai P96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 Gy I L U"; ~ ' ' 11~ SUMMARY ANALYSIS REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DC-68 1. (S) This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in compliance with a request for information on a target of interest to 1NSCOM ITAC CRD. The purpose of this session was to describe activity at the target on 30 January 1981. 2. (S) The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document, Grill Flame Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated. 3. (S) At TAB A is a summary of the data presented by the remote viewer- during the session. A complete transcript of the session is available upon request. At TAB B are drawings made by the remote viewer reference his impressions of the target site. At TAB C is target cuing information provided the remote viewer. At TAB D are Control Analyst comments. 4. (S) The summary at TAB A represents the salient points provided by the remote viewer and as such has not been subjected to any intermediate analysis, evaluation or collation. Interpretation and use of the infor- mation provided is the responsibility of the requestor. Approved For Release 2000/08/ri9rAK)UISI~)"~'-00788ROO0500330001-1 &'l W1 L I Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 I - TAB I I Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 Approved For Release NOW= P96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DC-68 SG1A 1. (S/NOFORN) Source #07 reported the following information regarding the vicinity of geographic coordinates as obser- ved at 230900 hours (EST) January 19810 a. (S/NOFORN) A building complex with a row of towers or smoke- stacks. A city is in the vicinity of the target. This city has buildings described as being more.old than modern (style), and as being English or German in style. The target is on the outskirts of this town. b. (S/NOFORN) At the target were observed two towers connected by a wire or cable, and a parabolic dish shape (see sketch #5). SG1A 2. (S/NOFORN) Source #07 reported the following information regarding the vicinity of geographic coordinates is obser- ved at 300900 hours (EST) January 1981. a. (S/NOFORN) A fence was observed located near the two towers which had been observed on 23 January 1981 (see sketch #5). Two aircraft of different types were observed (sketches #1 and #2) standing on an apron type area. Aircraft #2 was described as being white, large, not a "fighter", but not a commercial jet, and as having a "high" wing. Aircraft #1 was described as having blue'stripes and insignia on its fuselage/empennage (see sketch #2), and as being more of a passenger aircraft shape. b. (S/NOFORN) Source also observed six jet aircraft moving in the area as though they were moving to parking areas (sketch #4). Source described the arrival of these six aircraft as appearing like "weekend warriors", sort of a disorganized movement in a (apparently) unfamiliar place. Source described the purpose of the activity of these military, attack bomber sized aircraft as being that of a charade or misinformation function, although the pilot(s) and crew(men) believed their actions/ activity to be just (normal) training activity. Source described the (apparent arrival) of these six smaller and darker aircraft as being associated with blowing grit, screaming jets, and also observed bunkers of an unknown number in the vicinity of their taxiing activity. c. (S/NOFORN) Also on 30 January 1981, source observed a group of people moving slowly, as though in a processional, in the vicinity of the fencet two towers, and parabolic dish. Source did not further describe this activity. d. (S/NOFORN) Source also observed~ on 30 January 1981, long tubular shapes like those shown on sketch 0, and a large round bomb shape with four stabilizer fins on it's rear end reminiscent of the large bomb of early atomic type known as "Fat Boy." Approved For Release 2000/0610 n, ,goig' DP96-00788ROO0500330001-1 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 I -- TAB -1 1. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 App Approved For Release LI-I% 1788ROO4500330001 -1 NZZ3 cc A r I I I I ~ 1~ 201/ : JIA-R~D96-00788RO00500330001-1 0 /0 7 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001-1 W1 L-U ~ZE lzt ZZ! 7z V) V O%W. -4c 149 t X I 'I f> 1% 0% Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 LA to 2t 40 0 US .4 :F Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 t0i Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROL041, 001-1 IV Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 1 04" 04 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 I TAB I Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 n C A Ang r, v- Approved For Release 20UUIWLOIF 7 -00788R000500330001 -1 ARDP96 TARGET CUING INFORMATION REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DC-68 1. (S/NOFORN) Prior to the session the viewer was shown a sealed envelope which he was told contained the geographic coordinate of the target.' 2. (S/NOFORN) During the session the viewer was asked to describe the target area/activity on 23 January 1981 and 30 January 1981~ and was asked to elaborate on portions of his perceptions as directed by the Control Analyst. 3. (S/NOFORN) This viewer had worked this target before, but he was unaware of this at the time of the session. The previous sessions were D-84 and DC-52. Approved For Release 2000/081V I r,--yin" rru-UU I 88R000500330001 -1 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 r TAB I Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 Approved For Release 2000JQIY --RDP96-00788ROO0500330001 -1 CONTROL ANALYST COMMENTS REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DC-68 1. (S/NOFORN) Prior to the session, the interviewer was provided the following information for targeting of #07: a. (S/NOFORN) A sealed brown manila envelope. The interviewer was informed that inside the envelope was a set of geographic coordinates written on an otherwise blank sheet of paper. The interviewer was not informed of the actual coordinates. b. (S/NOFORN) The interviewer was advised that a general geographic description of the target on 23 January 1981 and 30 January 1981 was desired, with particular attention to the activity at the target site. 2. (S/NOFORN) Prior to the session, the interviewer advised the remote viewer that (#07's) target was represented by the geographic coordinates contained within the sealed envelope. At no time was the remote viewer made consciously aware of the actual coordinates. 3. (S/NOFORN) In-session targeting: During the session, the Control Analyst provided the following guidance/direction to the interviewer at the approximate times indicated: a. +19 min: "Have (#07) describe (#071s) current location." b. +24 min: "Have (#07) move in the direction of the plane." c. +26 min: "Have (#07) take a good look at it so (#07) can sketch it. It d. +28 min: "Okay, when you're ready, have (#07) move back to the present and determine any changes in activity or situation between then (30 Jan 81) and the present (23 Jan 81).11 e. +35 min: "Have him examine the aircraft." f. +36 min: "Have (#07) go find one of the others." g. +43 min: "Have (#07) talk about the nature of their activity~ they training, exercise, or hostil, SGFOIA3 KENNETH V. BELL, JR "~~NE~~ V. BELL, 1JR CPT, MI Control Analyst Approved For Release 2000/O,aEff-'g67M*tP96-00788ROO0500330001-1 lul I& V 011,