Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 SEWICES QUESTIONNAME Paquirement. Docunient No. 330/ Z193 Tl=: External Analysis and Development The following questions"are to be answered by the individual initiating the procurement request for contractor support services, and will be used by the Co in determining whether the services are nonpersonal. 1. 9M IUMBE OF THE W01RK (A) -Ib what extent can the Government obtain civil servants to do the job? Agency and other government personnel are not Milable with the recruisite skills and analytical background-- (B) Does the proposed contractor have specialized knowledge Or equipment which is unavailable in the Government? If the answer is in th e affirmative, describe the specialized knowledge or equipment. The potential Contractors have unique knowledge of this phenomenolocfical area. The contractors have e=loVeeS that are reggMized leaders in this field of analysis. (C) To what extent do the proposed services represent the discharge of a Governmental function which calls for the exercise of personal judgment and discretion on behalf of the Government? Not at all . (D) To what extent is the requirement for services to be Performed under the proposed contract continuing rather than short-term or intermittent? This requirement is expected to be a continuing task. 2. CONTRACTOAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE CONTRACIOR'S llyipm= (A) Tb what extent does the Government specify the qualifications of or reserve the right to approve, individual contractor emPlOyees? Security and possible specification of contractor expertise. Page 1 of 4 Enclosure 5 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 (B) To what extent does the Government reserve the right to assign tasks to and prepare work schedules for the contractor enployees during th e performance of the contract? Not at all. (C) To What extent does the Government retain the right (whether actually exercised or not) to supexvise the work of the contractor employees, either directly or indirectly? Not at all. (D) To what extent does the Government reserve the right to supervise or control the method in which the contractor performs the service, the number of people he will employ, the specific Outies of individual ezployees, and similar details? Not at all. (E) To what extent will the Government review Performance by each individual contractor employee, as opposed to reviewing a final product on an overall basis after completion of the work? Not at all. (F) To what extent does the Government retain the right to have contractor employees removed from the job for reasons other than misconduct or security? Not at all. 3. 01HM PROVISIONS OF TM CONTRACT (A) Are the services properly defined as an end product? Yes. (B) Is the contractor undertaking a-specific task or projedt that is definable either at the inception of the contract or at some point during the performance, or is the work defined on a day to day basis? The lootential contractors will be undertakiM a specific project which is defined at the inception of the contract in the Statement of Work. (C) Will payment be for results accomplished or solely according to time worked? Payment will be for results accomplished. Page 2 of 4 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 (D) ~o what extent will the Government furnish the off ice or working space, facilities, equipment, and supplies necessary for contract performance? None required. 4. AMNISIRATION OF THE ODNTRACI! (A) To what extent are contractor enPlOyees used interchangeably with Gov ern ment personnel to perform the same functions? Not at all. (B) To what extent are the contractor emPlCyel~s integrated into the Government's organizational structure? Not at all. (c) To what extent are any of the elements in (2) and (3) above present in the administration of the contract, regardless of whether they are provided for by the terms of the contract? Not at all. 5. OTHER. CONSIDERATIONS (A) Is the requirement the result of an unsolicited proposal? If so, describe. No. (B) If the procurement is sole source, why is it sole source? This is a limited source procurement. (C) What is the potential for follow-on procurement? There is some -potential for follow-on procurement depending on -the nature and extent of achievements in the QLbject area. The current state of this field of study is judged to be on the threshold of breakthrouqhs which would radically change the nature of this recruirement. (D) If it is significant, will the Government become irrevocably committed to sole source procurement? Not likely. If anticipated developments materialize this field of &47 could become much more popular with a Mg1ter number of contractors and academic institutions. Page 3 of 4 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000.200010-6 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 SG1J Prepared by; Code: PAG-TA Date: 22 July 1993 pursuant to the FAR and on the basis of information contained above and a review of the referenced acquisition request, it is my determination that the services to be procured'-are nonpersonal. (Reference parenthetical weights on various factors in the FAR.) Procuring contracting Officer I concur, and believe that the Contracting officer's judgment may reasonably be made under the FAR. Counsel Page 4 of 4 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO3000200010-6 RESEM~M OF PIANNED, Off-