Approved For Release 2000/08/08 "94-00789ROO3000230001-3
  S-01 7/DT
  Memorandum for Record: 11 January 1991
  SUBJECT: Project SUN STREAK
  Reference: Memorandum S-490/DT, 12 December 1990, subject as above. (Enclosure)
  1. The reference was our initial effort to do a comprehensive and systematic
  evaluation and assessment of DT-S' reports. A review of the reference will
  reveal that our efforts fell short in a nuQJWbf areas, and we were unable
  to get definitive evaluations in order to prepare a com rehensive assessment
  pare a com renensiv
                                    of this particular project. Our assessor, ' had identi-
  a we=rereoiuIre to
  fied a number of actions in the reference a were requ re to complete
  0
  our comprehensive program successfully.
   SG1J 2. On 3 January,= and
  I met withl view shortcomings in our procedures. As a
  result of that meeting, it was agreed: SG1J
  SG1J DB would provide an action officer to us with whom ould
  deal directly. This would allow us to obtain clarification on evaluations
  immediately, identify shortfalls in evaluations, and permit a senior
  staff dialogue to ensure the overall evaluations and assessments were
  accomplished in the most successful manner possible.
  Some of our procedures were too burdensome and needed streamlining.
  - We need to assess whether our quantifiable answer categories should
  be expanded to reflect the range of uncertainty when one is evaluating
  a DT-S report.
  - We need to reaccomplish the original tasking, updating it as necessary
  SG1J to the current situation. SG1J
    SG1J SG1
  3. dentified asAgoction of icer.
  and and I have reviewed the pro and ias pledged
  his full support. In a subsequent meeting, recom-
  mended that we not try to rectify and/or clarity tne am igul les an ncomplete
  data reflected in the reference, but rather reinitiate the project with duplicate
  questions where they are still germane to the current situation. I agreed
  with this recommendation, and tasking will be so drafted to DT-S.
  4. For our historical records and lessons learned, we need to capture the
  shortfalls we experienced when we first set up these procedures. I will
  task DT-S to prepare a closeout report on this episode, in conjunction with
  DT-3, after the new tasking is completed by DT-S (we cannot forward the enclosed
  memorandum or any other pertinent information on the first results). DT-S
  knows they will be retasked to do the same subjects, and we must ensure objec-
  tivity in their reporting.
      jz~L".
  1 Enclosure HN T. BERBRICH
  Memo S-490/DT, ~H istant Deputy Director
  ss
  12 Dec 90 (S/NF) I Cy for Scientific and
          Technical Intelligence cc: DT-S
  UPON REMOVALOPIFRUGBMfifSPTi"Rt?~a&D=W.LCWIRaMGAWMRIIAB600230001-3 ;FDT- 3
  DOCUMENT BECOMES UNCLASSIFIED SECRET