Approved For Release 200FDrM MU6-00788ROO2000240016-8 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755 S-HU-SA 11 Dec 1979 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Summary of Visit by CIA Representatives, 7 Dec 79 (U) SG1 I 1. (U) PURPOSE: To outline the siqnificant points of the visit of SG11 CIA/ORD/ACD, and . CIA9 to this office on 7 Dec 79. 2. (U) Permission for the visit had SG1 I 3. (S) During visit of 15 had discussed the development of the in the earl 701s. One aspect of the SG11 in developing personality in their program. It was agreed that prove helpful to management personnel been approved by MAJ Stoner, OACSI. Nov 79 (see MFR dated 16 Nov 79), we CIA ptogram involving remote viewing program was the work done by profiles on the individuals involved an informal exchange of data might hence, today's meeting was arranged. SG1 1 4. (S) explained that he had accomplished personality SG1 I profiles on the people doing the remote viewing, on management personnel involved in the program (i.e. and on some of the researchers from SRI. He.felt that it was necessary to "understand" all the people involved in the program not just the individuals doing the remote viewing. He agreed that his sample base was small but feels that the following data might be useful or considered in future selection processes: a. People were unusually sensitive ... b. People were good analysts... c. People were curious, adventurous ..... d. People were willing to try something new... e. People had courage of own convictions .... f. People were socializers.... g. People had above average IQ ...... h. People didn't like to stay in rut for very long, didn't like routine,matters ....... CLASSIFIED BY: DIR, DIA DECLASSIFY ON: 11 Dec 1999 EXTENDED BY: DIR, DIA -8 (6) Approved For Release 2 SECRET 96-OOM ftiyexmE Approved For Release 2 CAJ 96-00788ROO2000240016-8 R IAMF-OPS-HU-S.A 11 Dec 79 SUBJECT: Summary of Visit by CIA Representatives, 7 Dec 79 (U) 5. (U) We presented them with an overview of how we started our program, including the criteria we used to select our personnel. Many of the profile factors mentioned above were among the items we were looking for as we screened our personnel (see MFR dated 21 Nov 78). SG11 6. (U) suggested that personality profile data might be very helpful in future endeavors. He offered to give profile test to our people with the goal of attempting to see if there were any "common threads" that our personnel share with his'past results. I told him that I would consider his offer and get back to him. 7. (U) Another subject discussed was the possible dangers to the program if one of our people became disgrunted, dissatisfied (or even dropped) with the program. We all agreed that this was an area that needed to be looked at very closely and to see if there are any possible safeguards one can take. -"N MURRAY 5. WATT LTC, MI INSCOM GRILL FLAME PROGRAM MANAGER 2 Approved For Release OfflOfTrP96-00788ROO2000240016-8 su.%a