ry i-ecea"74 Upon thO purposes To do exp!-Qrqto r.-of physiq'ue (r,@@y tnilm) patterns of mea personality charao sties (OWMA-134) initiated: July 1961 8 &a a grantee-o-f--i@ Contractor., coat: $22)(00400 September- Statuu: Actual vork is expected to comence-in lose (Vit'hen Filled In) NO. Cost Account &OIZ Object Class 2 Oblig&tions Obligations Unliquidated Date ReznaeKs an&-Reteii&es-- Incurred Liquidated Bala.-ice 24 ljgu6@ 2 AUG 1961 5 (Whe - --------- t,f4t!c-r th@-- in 13 @kv7il- I-q-@ of tibe 2 -to C-oV,-r ip ALict,-A@LNr N lui @s 2 3 1 - TSD/FASS@@--------- Z -TSD/RB 6w iz TAIY 1961 UEMORMDUU POR: Chief, Fimmes Divisic@n VIA Offloo --No. I SU2BTECT -U=LTRA. Subprojot-t 134, kivotto AUotment 212.5-1390,3@02 In"ico N* 1 covering ttio above tubproject In-attached, Payrneht should be -iii6do---iis follows 2 c Itch"kintheamountof$22.0 n payable to the 16 2. Pl"i-- forwiid lb4@- h- "hiof,'TSD/R o a ch Bran@ch through-TSD/Btid t Offt c o r b)@ Z4 Tuly2, 3i,--Thisi-s---aiinalinvoico. flowavor. sinceit-tos.-itici-pat that additi6W- funds wiU be obli ated for this pralecti the filei7- Chia 2 TSD/Research Branch Attachraentlv,---- Involee- It -Cditiftt@ationg Distribution,., Orig 2 (Wloen Filled In) CONFIDENTIAL FUNDS POSTING VOUCHER VOUCHER 6@. 7-12 DATE 2-6 NO. 7- 12 DESCRIPTION-ALL OTHER A2CCOUNTS 13-33 47-52 56 - 6 7 fis. 70 71,80 STA;39N 40-42 '4F3 4,5,A4 OBLIG. 53 54-57 ALLOT. OR COST DUE 10 2 33 1:0.c EXPEND u y "CF. NO. GENERAL ACCT. NO, DATE Af4OUNT DESCRIPTION- ... !'?- . . @.......... CODE ly PER. . ', @ ; ;cr. CA LEDGER 6 2-157 ...... 2 of 0 PROP. NO. LID. A'C'c v CK..O. OBJECT ADVANCE ACCOUNTS 13-27 0 YR ACC ......... CREDIT ... 2 ... T. NO. DEBOT )L@h' CODE EMP. No. CLASS no V. s x REF. NO. 2 :RV I 7.5@zi EXPLANATION OF ENTRY T07ALS 2 'T PREPA -7 OR CREDIT DATE DAT@ REVIEWRIED BY CE2RT IF I ED, OOR-PAYMENT DATE SIGNATURE OF ',C r A TF YING OFF#Citlt FORM 4 io-sg 606 use PRCVoous c 0 SUBMITTED BY v UCHER NO. (Finance use cniy) ACCOUNTING BY INDIVIDUAL 2 UICULTRA Sub 134 FOR ADVANCE PERIOD OF ACCOUNTING FROM TO I Sept. lor>l 1,5 Nov 963 2 ArorLp.. follow Instructions on Revere* 0 DISBURSEMENTS - RECEIPTS I. CASH ON HAND BEGINNING OF PERIOD 2 DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ia. DATE DESCRIPTION -6iio-i A tacl%od CertijEi 2 -II- Au4 Boo cati 2 7 3a. 2 I ICASH I 1CMICK I-owlEy onoic@ A- REFUNDED "ER wtt" 2 S. CA 0 4ANO EN 00 PERIOD TOTAL TO @CCOUNT FOR @!L,"2, 00. 00 TOTAL, COUN FOR V,, 2, OOID. 0 2 APPROVE I c@.rt@ t a the expendi4urem I; I CERT I FY FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE 2 ated hereon an '@9LI4^TlON REFERENCE NO. CHARGE ALLe)'rMlEr4T NO. DATE SIGNATV OF ROVI or, any tte melits were ineurre or offlcialpur- 2 PON Confidential nature@ that payme t of edit ere for he a not been ei@ed,@ And that 2 u r:c., CIA i I I u and cor, 2123-1300-3902 2 A 64 1 a A@F n @m I a S GUA DATE ATURE OF AUTHORIZir4r. OFFICER 2 ERTIFIED FOR PAYMENT OR CREDIT IC AC L DATE is TAT@RE OF CEOtTIFY@lmo@(,OrfgrER 2 4 SPACE SEUOW R [EXCLUSIVE USE OF FINANCE DIVISION VOUCHER NO. 7-12 I Pk7PAqED Sy REVIEWED BY 4iF- SI Ss 34- 57 59-97 "a a -'I O@ I 23- 39 2 DUE PAY OBLIG ALLOT. LEDGER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ALL OTHER ACCOUNTS PER CRAL ... 2 C LED 42 67 OESCRIPTION A/P ITEMS 13- 30 p YR ACCI. NO. IK, no. 2 CT c As@ Ir, DESCRIPTION ADVANCE ACCOUNTS 13- 24 Val -PO vo "O:m 282 u:E,P,::Y'Ous 7 November 18, 1963 ACCOUNTING OP An'to Oarried Allocat4lon 2 Total Total Balanee an over from for second Funds from Zlrol Tl%r I!ZaLx oth2x 32=gez AxallatIg $2021 lizi5z§l 2 $11,400.00 $11,400.00 $13,300-00 $1,900.00 A-Stipend 2,000.00 $200.00 2,200.00 2,651-00 451-00 B-Clorl@cal & TO&ti,mLg 2 A621stance c@-7*ex to Stxbjeotis 600. 37-50 637-50 305-50 + 272.00 840.oc 1. 66.00 + 174.00 D@-Cost of Cimpultat,i xx 8 .00 1,@ .0@ 600.OC 6 + 560.24 Fe- 3t of Public& ion 00 el .30 01c 7 0 4919., c i4 6. + 92.90 G- fica Expanse3 5 20 1 co 23 1 437. :L. 6 9 . 2 - 171. 2 40 0 22, 2 4,..-. v 1 1. 3 + 70.07 x- zt Equipment c 0 302. 9 2 5 5 + k7.74 i-Book2 & Journals 10 w7 2 6 + or)s 67 .,@L 96 all 50 $17,000.00 $290-35 $20 46@.85 $20,462.85 satisfacto2.,Iiy 'wei,e incurred c-@l (1,,,L, Febmarv 1963 g-i-61 to 8-31-62 $22.000.00-@-,-- Received,@ Expended: Sa34r7:@@@priii-c-lpal Investig4@r-710,800,00 2 cieri-c"nti -Test 1,47)i22- __:@W80 0 Fees-to Subjects----- oo Cost-of- Trav 30?.* 70- of B<>6k",-nd 4o,@-2rnalt Y-is Ex-p to- I to-h"t BalanW b- year 5 $ 391?2.@-0 Thistit==@@ tMO -statercfnt Of accounting ,as-r4@@rte-8d to the Fnnd@@ -a4 Tr@ 'IO .00 r- 't 10 00 2 Ind %04 E-4 tv 2 14 4-.O -4 4i 90 5 .4 4v Cht&4@Ln@ce DidSioo UZMO&%AXMM RORI., siulay=T t WULTRA4 @@6WI34@ Uvalt No. V@@ 2 AU4tmed ZUS-U"-$90A -16"ko -NO. 14044wthe abova gm-bp-rojeot to &ftgtked.- $22 ooo- "PM ]3rancu 2 ftt S"UWAI f=d$ ViU th's fu4o st"d not be tlo*&777 - - - TSDtReso",ch ]3mck isivaicim; CIDTU&AUO" I I -TSD/F'ASS 6 TSD/RB For Service3 -4 CFMIFICAT4rONS (1) it is 1,@ere'OY c@-rtified-tbat this Is I &PP 'ULTRA,, e la s that-services are being- lio,, of M -I' ce7mith- mutual acc ,*Ii-s-hed in-accordan agrce,"Ien 8. that a detailed 4i*ri4a, Of, th@:-- payments 4nd receipw is.L@ile-in TSD2/n -t@at this bill7i"vgt--"d corm,at and t@,At-payment thereof has not yet bee-.i made. Z@hief, TSDFRes-.urc!T Br@ane (2) It is to S2ubPr@)ject of WJLTRA yhicii was@::duly approved, "--that tl,-e pro,@eat is bei t in accord%-ice vith the memoraridum-of 1,3LA@@1953-frco-the-DCI -this authorit"m-aubseque-n@l[&4rorsnda.-.-- and the ext?uaion of 6 Research Director Date: S?VSMIT U,-;Ier th4-. A-ut,-norivy- tymt-s -Inc &nted 13-April-10 frc#.,. V,-v DCI-to-the aut:-.ority-in au'o. 2 -b67@@ati to Chief To. /ti@se nch--- PUI 'DS: Cu wi"4 3 Dat!-3: Dist,rn- ut4-@on: Ot-ig. 2 I ---TS DFASS TSD/RB June 91 1961 A Memorandum to: Subject: Recommendation for-,F ng $21, 000. Oa777 After considerable deliberation on the os-al -its funding 2 is recommended, de-spite the superf'iclar, nd -tho-qvestionoble products whic.h have --ed from previous research. It is ontemplated that ---c -o-n s- 2 i ed r @@d 3- igilkh-, trengthen the research occompt sh D thr rs@ilplaffinftlos@ u' his is an i mp"nt area -of research and - one which we' hove wanted to start fi>r@@ long time2-. We would Ilk - to ciet someone-- e_ oF better stature working in the area, but_this oppeors to be the -besLwt-can--- accomplish at the moment. This work fifi iii@indirect assessrre irement and will contrib2ute WO -. @. VI is engaging. to the Wechsle"r"-.-B'elle-'v-ue--'@@rk- in 1;@aw Its funding i's recommended.-- eb Enc: 2 (oroposat and comments 1byiw Dear Dr c,, '00 V a In accord= vM L an b revised pr6-posal-=4 budot f6t--"tldy in Con6tittiti rai-- chotogy. Wring_tho (09-year par2i-o-d-trom Septembo:o-l Angitst 31, 1962, -I propos@@- to carry, out an extonsiori idY which I reported tO--Mla3t m=t'h- tudy- Is ti 2i.6 objootive-of-thit--s D exploro,andtdofine the mturo a@Ed @e@@6"lationships uhich , gn tho bas is o- f the pilot stud:t@@r to ii"t between-Withr6pometrio dimen- sion,s dovolopgd-tV-Eholdon and others and sele6ted-pt"hologioal dimensions of'tomperamentil perception, leamtftg,-Lnt@6uigd-f"@ and pononalitys -lboa 6sio@al'dimen'sioA"Ill be defined largoly as thoy-voro prosoot btit changes arA additi@h@ R"--- -be (xiuined th-thi@;-lottort- Ttio; listrat4gy" of 2this it@-dt-L$ Lto eathi ."@Vido range of datal from'anthrop6iii4trio measurementso throkiah cogniti-ve.-- Ainotions to pars a-rcila.tively--smal:L number of su@300ts. 0 Of this-stra 0 2 oltioidate and-4--x-pla dness' of-li@@behalvior to Is manifestoa-t --a---n-----indi-V soy -diff-arent levels as it oral gi@--l-think that corLst2mti4 of functiorlin -a tasis ror Dnal p$ychology, offe@W some promise as the-integration of observatidh6@ Om biolomrg psyWolo4@r, @and-uiol-o--g--Y--Into -a- cbh#t6nt-pattor-n- of relationships,, 2 As youi-iii@o--w--from readif"a-V--i-a-itt-tWrts the of the Pilot etad§-Ls--not--o@mplet@d4 Novortheles-$,--tZe--a-vallable anuysls points-out--the val-u--o- -of several changes-iii thinking and 2 procediires I* The pilot projeot wao the -4smimption me thod-CB-r---clAli§l.fying'h,,imm prisi that Sholdonla ques a mothods more- critically-j- pro DO fam0iliarity Witli-bls M6thods The liirig of this ablay '&7r-M-oansei Ili not be 3 a step-essenti *'blo to-rely on the'use of pte-somatotypod oibjoots. 2 2 The pilot Mjoot-hai indicatod that pliysical dimonsions Other than so-uto S-14ch as-hoiaht-md holid size# apparontly correlate with p 6gidal-ft2imtimso I olazi to-oeai-ch the litoratui-e for other' 141iy---Sii:nifioaL,-n ons ,t physical dimonsi for inclitsion in thio --research., - Ad@4ht -stiidios by '2Aidd6thato and Vandenborg vill-be avil,,.tble for this ptirposoo----- 3, With rejard to--thovr-olAtionship l@etv;@on phy*e-ictffil@e-a@nd temporuments tho-pilot stndy break with 2thold6i@(@@ pers'istiag --- in Sheldonts- ing# iftet#4" e- -of t!W tm*7--- view that pbysiqd ohd temperament are S,443 coin l I worked V2ith -Die ld4'-a-that- tlio -differeinces-between th4---- ts of 'pbysiq-le@@@ components o:C-tobp6r=o:gt are sitatt",@ "O"POT oant their OvA right# 66t@6 of --the highest cor"ldtidig - ancl- 2 most provoonilve-f@ndiMe-omergod rom this dopalturo-a---2iose promisinz re@.-ults - iinderlino--the V61 of r-ovisingF7dh-d-r-e- f iniiia the self-administered tooperament-scal6@@ Thidimimmor to gather mor4-dat,,V-on--this test from $OmatO,typed--si-ib othor inv stitators-hWO7@been wor'jcin3 indO@@Ontly k to- r:wt2i@"t of devisin,,v, aiolf--a-coinistered able to use thei-,@@al too& The pildt:t-tiw --, -t o-,4 -ti ---'b4tweoni%rs 40 s dit, IA bns mlb-tosts 2 -gh oric and comioonents-of-prw-s-i--q-noo w Pit-iire stdav factorial studi6gli6f@:Vii r @@@less , 11 13-W hope tlia_t relationships'vhioh7V6t6-WrolY@@2:9"tiWbut'not st2atistical significant vill be- repl4ttd- tistid--- tronger and ally s PSYO"@qical Moro mewiingni Both of-the Perceptual tasks i -in the pilot itudy ised 2 showl,old @ignifiO@Mt-Oorrol4tions q@-pwii qno ion may- sukgosts that the-f iold:@Ok7t4tcOt b4 art7--ospo iaiw 2 gm=-be f ruitintl intimodiaw 4M---6i6ih phys*Lv-e and-portonalit$'-@-- 1) I intend to use additional I- - ta--- -- k.4-a- -n-d--will - g iv6 - Priml%2;y pereeptua s - Wo-wia-4!i - ----- con-siderati'on to lh6t67Uhlof@ have -derioo-of roiatedness to personlalityLvaria'olobe--- Zi' iesultb7@of -the-70ilo indidate s,3ve ral V4s in 60 0 jog- which tiho battery-of ldarhifig-- coui@T-bo rovitddi _Ono task, nonsonsemas@llabl probably- be-.d2r-o - -44 o 164@mm pp A co-nditioning-oxporimen whid eai%ant stipjuliis o(xild ti -iti., t'noorotica3-ly, lead-- 2 it"iftoront--rela- OnS 133 W physlqtos Die possibili@@--f other simplor and pvirer I"ining tasks will be exp!O.re4-6- Participants in th"ilot project were eiven three paper@- and-pencil porsoh2ailty --( To date ->smzvoig Picture Pi,@isti@ation tk,,L,-3 h -td@it mly the 1,@l'I'Pl scores liavo been iroluded in Uio statistical-&-.naly)s2i's). --At'tEo present time, two othei tests are bdiit@@t@idored-for,-inolix-si-on in the bAttery-a-Mid7@ilf6-rd-7-innormmn Tomp6rament &-,al6-appears to be closer In concepti6if to -Mell6ni-o@--idoas than --any- other standard tost of ilts dimonsions-aie framed------ in torms ot n-ormalu f@inotioning adiiit-s, tho kind of -@@bJeats intond to use# F-orsoh;,achis ideas- abkxit the psychologicat-mo=-ins of color, movement, and form respoasso- to -inkblots -appo-ar to---- -- d parauel the dimonglbh"7aflfe--ot--.-c-on--a-ti-o-n---an. Holtzman's version of-fbktbhawt2 a ouitable vehic for testim thooo rolationabipsi, 8* Z intond-to colloot-prelt*lii@ d-a-ta@-coneeml al orienta'tion, voc-atiA6@iil@-i eoialitdtwont-an-4-transe'@rA,o -nvtal@4-,a6@2-n--d- religious this stao the- data -would be 8* -iii'to- oseentiall.v expt@@- Kly -inUhi7ims v 2 prov o as . ro@idl -of--a th@@jeot as- i, praotioatt sectional v;ov a 5 relationships -between s to Pe and Pys L0417ftho it is most im rtant to so- sUbj6dts Mid-@ nt:th6 2 ot each of Pe-threo-.som coacorn in Uw::solootion-of7Mi@J46tit I a@m assured, @or svpply or subj4dts from so sourcest c Ollegos-- I---w organization! I an- opinil - concern,-, t&d progma - In idditiwto stst I expect to ,spend the oq4iv in fa fo each'aiibjooti Aitlnz the 6 ba V""st4l,41- to-_thO-- 2 collection of to -test@-@-a-t- least pi)ssibly as stipend*# ueoo Clerical &A_testing 4#sittanddom -- - ---- 1 1200-@ Fees to subjootsweo#ooteoo####Ooo -39000 ti Cost or c6aiuta eo,st,of publication,,.****#***#*### 600- 600 Travel*,* 0 t o # to to 0 toce 0 &# t 0 #I I 0 4 a t Office oxpensos a-6-4-i a 0 et 6 * 42@@@ Sonatoty,pifig O-CfftiPCOAt-and oui@@r-- test Books and jckimal$ooe#oooooooooto Contir-gencies $22,000 $'apt# oat,., and-Nov-* ig6it Proo"ion o2f test-batto@'r-Y-Vfd -for btibj 66t:s-o makinz art@uit@ents Does 1961-i Jani-7 to '.'by 1962i Testing and data coll6dtit6-o----- June to Augp i9624 0Analysis of-dat4,and roportiris of I hope-that this brief revision will. facilitate a favorabl.a decision 6onc#thii@@@W, proposal I am looking forward as so ,Is- ay to devot#lg my ftil attenti-*--n- -to -this-praject On L D sent-cj2AAraot exPiro.,3-at-tho_gnd of iiin(,,# 1'4 Pleased- that agroo4-.to 46t ad A oozimiitant to so stagos--of -tliid -stndy'. Tiianks -again--for-Yco-ir consideration and onooa ragoments r 'Por I Tne stands -is poorly orkWze4. (I preswne- it Is not a final-producl".) It is hard-to-g-*.@-a cle&r-p'Lcture of-- what he has -,LPound@----- 2 2 s sa.,uple (as '.he admits) Is far from ideal:@@@- size and in its-highly_se'LectiVe ch"acter. 3. He has rore Y&riab les-(6o-tb-7o)-than subjects. A complete correlation-matrix vould-contain some 3,00a coefficients-.--" T wish he2 had-reported-scwne means @-ete.)-as a@parttal check on the sample.-L@Wechsl6kllim-t6r-r-'i7i4"@@--espq;jally help:Pil@. 5. 7.qe-difference scores Ln4 ralto-scores ate-d46@ept iylel@@@@@ik tric2ky. Correlatioria--involvirig t@,eii axe nil'& -of -artIfAot@@-- They@@@@- cannot be Usel in 6. NeverthelO@@ome ofA@he-findir.,gs are provocative, and -@6it shou'd be d6@.el@ --I wciu more work ot--thia I Id recow,)end a- larger mur4ber of iubj"ts,-I@64.@ter re-presentatiye-of the ' neral-l>opulation-@ ge- Me data to be-'analy-,ed-should-@b@exper-imentally--indep@7,*ndent' LO difference- or-ratibLscores). as somatotypeo sh<>uld-t@6-ittluded@7- 7 should-be -,onsulted. lie ha3-dore-consid6r----- .ab.le v 0 @DRAFTLIM W@ A' 29-May-1961- MEMORANDUM FOR: THE-RECORD SUBJECT---------@MKULTRA@--Subproj@g-qtl34-- 1. is to ortthe,research-@, 0 r. kiis propos i, inc@Tudir@g s t i 7a t e-crl-u7 g -eT,- -and MM the results o?eMarlier-Wot studies which led to:the present proposal ar6 attached. @2i@ -for the Agency, althouyh Z -Th@@fblevarice of this study - - 0 - ---, f rankly exploratory-iti--nature-, is idits potential contribution to clandestine indirect asses- e it -- i. e.-,-- without the subject' s 2awareness. work by Dr. and his associates, as well as ot'ners, has de- veloped some pr iii b@it inexact-relationsh-'Aps between-body type -and tempera onality characteristics). It-:is from this earlier work that Mr will develop his line of research. TK"eparttire from--01----- earlier -icn examines component patterns of physi"es in rela-.--- tion to component 3 f pi -Mte-rns. -of t-emp@@VAMent- proa-ch.@--- 2 Dr- @@has agreed o 1 analys isi@ A I thi on prob.Letris of desi S- 2 'I L'PD r@o-v-i @---@-researr-h-wi t'onal data which will be useful in advancing his-own researc program-- (MKULTBA,,- Subj@oject 77). Funding And- mrnitorinjz of thig@i@roiect will be handled by 2 in the regular manner.--Accounting or e n=e rocedures previously established by the - - ---t-----u p rmanen _e ipnient -req@iired for the project will become the thilm -of-t5his subproject will b 4. -The-estimatedtost@ e $22, 000 00 for a period of qne year. Charg es -should be made against Allotment No-. 2125-1390-39OZ.;, .5. Mri is neither cleared nor witting of true Sponsor, nor is there any intent to rnake h' a im Witt s cleared a-nd-witting consult@iht- t6 the earch Branch Distribution: Origirial@O@ y A1l@*&ached:-- Proposal -OF-FUNDSL APPROVED F-OR:OBLIGATION Date: OFIENTATIONs The'cnntenti6aLthAt-p-t-y-pbological-functions-var.v in--- relation to phys ical st -re- is as --o- 1-d- --as- -,the s tud3@@ psk!@-- aholo". There h4t!bei@@oh- irit4i*#t:7:ih2--the--relattbMhips between disease- and--------- psychosis on - the - otlier@@@@@i4tihAV"en--done -of the re- latio.vi3hip between-@o@ and intalli no (Naccaratis ge- -6 Sheldon)* os g4tor. (l.4orris) @.as attemRtqdLto relate value-ortent-atibii- to- pl@y*Wies Very few st"die"tO@LkhWh t exist of the-i*lationships bet-d@-physt-cp-ie-and mich cognitive functions as-pe-reeptioA-and-It@@ing,, The a@@@mp@idns implicit in--this-stiidys The basic one-is that an-individiial-eii@ges in-aror such a way that his-bohavior is-affe--C-ted-to---aom"xtent -b"a-ch aspect of t2tis natilre-of -the-ta-sks the time-spaee-aatrix which are imputtd to It), Oness pli@@e is a-SY3teC which cAt-- for t* ig--c-n--cepbiatized as a coneatenam tion of several Ainotional o-r s-t@@t4i@4217i@-lb-systoms. method offers-one-vay-of-d@@Obtilly-aii!Yting ror the ptirposes of - thi@i7stiidy-it i-s---a-s--siised that this method is meaningbil in terms of-certain ps@@@ological variables@ These variables are aff tat5 I - co-n-ation-2 amd oogniti-o-'n, - Sholdbh- i@Ofe- rs to the andcaorphio oomp@Zont --of -@Wi"e as a moamtte-- of -its tendency to 'seek--and _T.Alilo- @Af f 6-ative experiences the masomorpr-le coi4pbr@ent is thaight to correlate for conative expression and Ui"tomorphid -mponent 16 tdtn Of-66i@nitive aV&r*M 2 by Sheldon as-tb.O Index, sai7@st 4@3 ondo- morphys mosomorphy- or-octomoi-ph,----c-a-n-not-6xi$t-ind6p@Wertlyl neit7r.er sirtoly7hWiii pat@f@it onlv in different-proportions to each o2t@,6r it Alto Appears that neither _nor cognition c@m- ever-b"served -witliceit tho -activ-o presence of each other,. Tt,,e-psycholo?,ica"t, no mat-ter-hCF4--otrikiNly 2 a mirely aff c"Uve l@cT@atiVd-@! or cocat@@ve , mn,,,,t may appear tb@@-_ .-, __ always inco'rporate at 16as"tnimat cdlanta of t-he@@tho-t--two psychologicAl7t@6donents2. The l@i@@@bot-l- tho mystic d -th- an e dreamer ap)?roach-the asymptotic--extremes of@absence-of affect---- conation, aM:tjUAttion respoetivdlys Diffei@6nt@@e2-o-ries-of lealting b-ave given differen-"tial- emphases to: the -ri@@@@t"ff-attives- 0 atiV*i--and cognitive Mnish@- ment In lea:rning-KWo-tended to mini-m-i-ze-intrimto m-oani-hgit;@@ the content o;r xnd-to make off 'rt tional--- 0 needs. Ektah t4,teories@-conld-bo cons-id-orel7@im&rily-aff4@tIV6-@@---- their 2 orientations FOldVian condittdiing is considered-A777, paradigm of "affddtly4l' leamingo----Whon--an--explanation--of-lb@@@ ------- ing empliaslzes dtill----!*Dotitions or wwrots-ol-it-ten44--to r2ediiee both omotiori---and meaning to--suborddlnate and :insignif te-ant- roles In their infbi4h"76t(@ agnative. -It-ii--ill*istfated-by IYorrAikets L@@"f-Et@"i3e and C@dthrials amphasis:im-the neces-sity_f-o-r cora%ifffitty between 3tiMI1113 aM &Qtion-for take ge3talt-psychological appm@kch --iii-its emphasos-on the perceived I - me wiing of the matori4l- to be learned and on the - role---of --Me,-Ahibs in the leaming RMq".s tend&--to minitiiz6 the iraport2ance of both feelings an d strivings.-,- It -therefore proptSe3-A-tlieory -of in& vhlch Is --primarilt-d-dgnitiv-e-f TYi-9 g-estalt- laws-o"rganiza- tion emphasize-tbe---nootid--Piocess inste@td Of fooliht@@@ ttrivi2ng-S-9 This sequenow-of assumptions liO3 at the-basts'of a present studys-- le Ytantfs-trichotomoqis divi@@ib;@i@@Yohololical afft@6t 1 conativf_,_and cognitiV6-@asp,ee-ts-2is at I-east heuristicalit:@@@@@ 2, aieldon-13@:@a"pos-fftnett&i-diffdron.tially'so that ondoe4orpW-"ok affdbtive e-x-perienc@-i-@masomorphs-respond more--eff,6-c-tiVtly to conative ogp_ortinities, and- aotomorpl@s- are most 3- theories, according to the relative- i-m- ---taride7they ascribe--t@@---- por the affective 2 conativ-e, and ---- itive-aspects or _cogn grganismic--- Bnildihg7@"b@t-6- develops a battery.@@@- taswvhicih are-,s"ff tol4btlY7--@7-- d lffe rent f i6d 2---6h6--@Lh6thO r -4@3 - to - ovoke - d tff-e'rent - love Is -of affective, 'conatival arA cognitive b4ha--V-io--r-; and if one administ@@s -t"ki--td--tomat typod--subj4dts-- the -subjects sh*,il1d this battery-of 0 1 differ signifit@i-ntlY@:@@ir--ability to le4m-tho diffd-@t kinds of tasks -Actordins to differences In their somatotypo3-o----- HYPOTliE$W COMOM NG LEAM NGs Conditioning-can be viewed as-the passive (non-conative) learning of an lntrinsie3lly meaninglt@@t@A@q@@ tively weak) light precedes air-piiff to eye) in order to attain@L"J"otly_phyA_@@gratificatiorL oi@LA"i a comparable !discomfort-6--- Sheldon says i@M@@phs-terA to-seek physical comfort@,-@@@@p4tt- of-----thel:t tendency--to--o-rganize their lives aldn"fect ihg liV", If7WIs right, s at then ondcaorebs@shoald-le,-Ir2n a paiii-.-reinfdt"cl C"O to 0 than either I somorpw-or ectomorpl,3. Fof--this-pt m-e _rp@M eye-blink conditiming vas-Aits I2L the somatotonic-@t44@ob@@t (wliieh for him is:essentially syncny- mous with mesworphy-) ih4icates a physical sen-se--rwzardle-ss--of-7@@bs-e-nee of the@pos@ibiliti-es- for deriving elaher-co itive-me s 6r,aff6etive gratifida-M tion from the-actiVit*r.--He sees the assomor h-as-oriented tbVard--- skeleto-muscitlar-aotti@4-f6k--@@ pl@@@@- of::@7A@6t itself, If so, then orf@@@@e -on a 16@@iAt:Wk vhich emphasizes drill- of nouro-ouacnlar-response3 in vliich neithor-fiii6@@ti9"te- -tive sati4faett6iU74k4 o momen ortainatims 'nor - affe o --- f "b@*ld correlate 2 To-'t4st this-hypothesi3l_____ a finzer-mazo vas 3@ Utomorpny -correlates positively-Vith theLAbllity to loam cognitive patterns " to order experience me;mingfnllyo-- Sholdo6--- thinks that as-ectom6iphy increases there is.-'an-inereasing-- reliance on coanttVo7n-&-s--thd7major 661" coping with lif e Is @777777777777@- proble=t Habit-toi@"tib6-- Viere Is relatiVAly less concern about-ph sioal comfo-r-t-,--M@Wledge- and-iinderstandire-*r@-- more imeportant 2UiW"Lther and--ithi6yer4ont--(ti@.0 conativo power goals) o r-At-mtr -i-ty ar-O - c omfdit te --- affective goals), If this Is sog then there-3hoold be a Oc2t morphy wA botli@t0@aory hypot"o is, tVd transforablellori@p es. In order o kinds of- t@isks vere its* C@ne w-as- a- series-of-60 "memory-for- designs". prpblems-givon-cono"rrently The other-was@@-a---modifi7cattbzi of KatonA'tF@match@@tticX:O*@@@6nt. It is expected tlia-t--(a) wgxpu 3ii-i-I wilb 4. &d6penia should-66fi@dlaWpositiV*lY--Vith th-4i--ability -t@6- loam nev-sonsorimotor pafteitt-vliibY-664 sto vith old -6to-se 'Jho reasoni" behind thit-)@@@is Is that provides the--needod!Ltonsortmot26i@-skill- and actoiiorphy pr&ides ft6dL*"ablished i the froodw of;ro3ponss--ondomorphy could b4-expected-to--vork-against--iiqceosg cn-thi3-kind-of-leari@- 2 ing task boognaUW&ff"ti 1 goal 13 availa The task to correlation with ordopenia is- mirror- or draving of-a-3tar-pattaito---Thii-t&3k vill-be scorod both-for time and for accuracy* 2, With--r-,-Q--g-ard-to tidio@---it Is hypothesized that gog la:iilaa=droilog t464q"-of froodoi-ffom--tOWedne33-to established-patterns of --Oye-liand coordination,,- 2 acc-aracy, It-is hvpoth*sized-that becanso of greattt skelato-am3onlar -control. 1=ld2n ELU30- '.-@-,,somorphs are charalaterited by as practical conatival aTd-intentional-in:their behavior*- then mosomorphy---shooftld militatV-*941nat the@passive le@ing-of- unintentimall apParently-tit6lo@ss materidl-@o '.'4oreavert -the relalft tive passivity-of-4M66orphy--wA the-hyper-attentimAlity@-of- 2 ectomorDhy-sttodld--tend-to omance tllis k!fA@:df teat-ning.- As a measure of inei4"tal-lea@49 a 50-item wiltiple-choice test was devised f too WAIS -ite*@G@ 7h-e-:-',dAIS-V"--giv6nLto all@:@bjec &M the WAIS, by -abont_ a weeks-- thre If ectcaozwp-seek:mowiinz- in Viair cognit@ve experiences, it--- might be th(mght-%44 ect-opones would be the most remy-to accept 2and work with is desigt" to::@@@d of --bi7 im as poasibl6o--.%i)ii@ says-oot-o-c-io-r--pht -are- relativel@-veak at-memorization ---- then ectbpenes-might-be better at a task'ct77"t4::@ory .. t44koth2er smatotypose TVt*Wthis of nonsense-*yllables were needs -Each series of eigh"ll-able-s was -learned according -to th6- aerial anticipatloh methods IAYPOTIIESM COMP.IFMNG PEWEPTUAL--FVNCTI2ONS.i Proficiency m the J@mbodded-FitU"s-TOtt (Witkinls--- Form) has been shovn-to correlate signitic4ntly with field@ independence - vhieh, according to Witkin et -is tiore com4en in-aotiv* p*oplo -5-who manifest-high self-asuem aW considerable awareness of thei CAM to Sholdong-aotivity correlates vith-moscoorphy and self-awarenes$-oorrelata3 with-, actc5@-t.)rpbye &domorph-;--botht-r.-it-drally-- as active-and moro-@ ex2traverted affectively- would-supposedly bo mor-e-field-depoMtat* it is tliorefore-hypothesized--thdt-- leag.Y 0 Poo'plo diffe-i@ IW-thd--fttent to wllitab- they a" tubject- to optical illits2tw@@ diffi6-@es-in.soz%toty o mi&ht cast some-lieht-W the nature of-th"rceptu,@l-difference# setmorphy is:-tl,,Ou t - by %a don td--@@co - atter-tid44,llty and cognitive tho,.ox2erciie-L@@ih arrivi" at ddt-isior@.t., Ti, should vork-agawt the Offect-a-f-ai@ @pti@(4 illnsim. -Th4 more spontanoo.is rosp --.-to - _ons*3---of Uit7o,topen,5 s2hCklld!Uoreforo tend accept the 1,11"iont t@yo+.hosizod -that- &UAgagU-____ HYPOTHBM TWEPi...N= T i She@ Id@Wst7f ind -the-relationships between gs emes tAg:@2@ - pbysiqte and@t@6oi6@@@t have been critioized on t.',e,@ grcw%ds--thoit the same person-(Mold )--- bjodtt-foilboth somatotype on ratod--hls -su and toisperamorit. - Since-th@2--Nblicatib4 -of -his --original Studyl there have; been no reports of iittbkpti--to -e.ithe-f@plii:d disprove his fi-ndihts. Miis-prosent-study includes an-initial attea,pt to devise -an-Ilobjettive" 3oltlo-r*tim-30ale-vhich obtutes this lxportsat obj4btion to- Lbol4on's icethods - A self.@ia@tiht-@ scale of 178 items was-prog*W -f-rom-Sholdonta--descript on$ of visoorotonial soxatotoniap arA--66ftbrotontas' It is- hypo zed- that the following relati&it--Vill be foundi--@. 29 3. goto2x- IIYPOTF-ESES CONCEPNING P BothiNAtearati--and Lholdon luve Athir@dies-th#At demonstrated-low positiVe--66trelatims of physique-& Thi"ihdii" itself-I" liattod-,interesto Since the tid@6;VhWthese st,*dies were dt*io@-nich-vork-h@i:Ub66f@- done m the-m2eani"-of-t@ib-t"V-V@Wi-les with the-h6t@@develot@@@@ ing profil6-g4t4Mq which-66rrelateVith-aspoets of personalitY',-7----- -LMchologttt"ling to the notion t,@at- the-- a2ific virianoes-of@@b-test scores on mch tests.,as:i@@XIS-provide infomation ab-mat personalitylo Working on thit::ktft#ption -JLf-ignificant torrelAti6ht@@ be she@m to o,-ttst be atotype compments 4 and botween-WAIS sub@@tests should be able-to make-,swo-dednottdt"out-the value WARS for tle-dosoripti@6ecof- -personality. We @Are-therefore- -by th"izihk-that-I 2. 7777@: 3- ra2b Protest@Lnt@the-ol6gical sbidents iM mlnister3 vopre iised-A-t-mibjects, and scaatotypsd-_b)r L-nold!p2n or 1,.Js assist@intb, ---TWco;p-qtitlited a f airly riomogenoonp- gr(xip In that@--all -ai* college- g ranates all hu,ve had 6ome-exoosnre to clinical past-o-rill -training as a Of their edne-ation-f or tYLe-ministryl- and all are %ropean stook@@- We voiild-have preftft6d-7to tiave- chosen@LairLmibjeots_ on the basis@of-somatotYPol hit because.this vas-not practicall we had to vork vith::@@ple which was iinsel"ted accordi" to tllis 2 criterion. In hio-".Att@@"f-ll,'6h"-Shold6n.gives the means and standard deviatidit- -f@6@@h condonent, boed on a -3ample of 129000 su@jects, as fbllowst womolphy 3- 34---- f 0 - isio II---- 1 - 03 mtw6-rphy 3-*42 1*18- 777@7_ io- f who* 4it4 -obtained, -en t For Pe 46 s-@tbje ts mgh tes in o"r statistidal2---inalYtist the comparable data to inclnde figtires arei: 1+ 00 1 :?7. "4*scaorphy 4'*17 -39 60 Edt7 3-22 1-tig A co@spa2rlson of:lh@"--tablos sho%m that- our rarlag- of -iaesooors>hy is imich narrowo-r--than Sholdonts norms and -th,%t-our --- $Ilbjeots rank substantially. -hiei@:oif iii -erAbi6r"* Th-e- -f -o-- --mor-shLortoomi2ng VI It male.e it diffiditlt@@@tO 4ccOPt Or rOJect lvp-qtheses ii*olving the influence-of;44$:Otorpby anl@6"- the relWant-correlati-on's meet ri-eid tests of -itatistic-at st&if ic@mo-s. EXPU,I.WTAC,-TZST BATTE E-ach-subject was given a ntimbe- r Of tests- vhich inc-lqdod-t Is scoatoty 24 "The--Bb!tN@:@4--fof T@@@nt",.-a-self-rating--scale- 2 based --- on She ld oh I s"Va ri" i6" 3, Tw6-trialt t@6-the- 14-iller-Iffor-Illiisibli@in--a small) hand- s 4 Witki@@@@Gottseb-aldt' s --embodded?!f test. 54 A except f6-r-the - V6"b"l*iry - sub-to it. T-ho- Edneational T4Atihk--Samite experimont-al--Ye-rsi<>n was-- US'04 t was in the standam vay. 6, FI&t rins_ on a f ihg@6@mue2 -- soored for tiixe@ rmmber of blind-alloys entered-and-"ber of dirooti6nal--rev6rsalso Tiiis task.- wat-- presented-in two sessions of -f ait- trials t achp 2 VA 7. Poi r-serie;@-@icht-ilobt-ei)Ad-syltables oacl-.v-gretented on a--memory74,@@, scored for-nimbe"f tri-al"P--to-- btit--not Lti@@@dtlig two c-onseciitive- 2correct trials-& This--- t43k w46 resented in two sesstbh:s-of O" 0 Sixto4"ttdr draii scored t -*---b---th-- time and-1 a-orossinps. Tptt--td2tk-Vas preanntod-in,two sessionc-o"ight trials 6athe go An-eso4@441W:prepared versidi-of the Kat6l)@@@tick- experiment vhich--6,aplbydd--toi4 trials-on-fOifidiff-ore-nt------- problems, scored for time- and 0114bor of @iicoesseso 10. A on theL-@.iIIS scored f o-r--riitz4bor-- sverse 11. AVGN%@@@@@itiMW---dxpo2rtAent, scored- f or-Aro-Olim ,tnde--of - responses on-a---s--c---ale--of -0 -f i@om wl,4ich an axplittidb 0 response td--tot trials-b@4@@ of-re3ponse- to-a-c-(-i3itL&i-trials.: The stihdarcl tion-of@:"eh7@bj-66tls rosP@@@plittt(le-s to al@7@isi- tiWtri.il"s--com ited as an index @ of --Wriability, of -Onse--2 3.0 12i A "momory@-f or-dO3ign-s-11 task-vas---developgd-Wm4rily to- enhance@iattentiveness and.co6paration dnrinz the a bllhle--@itioniiii7proce(hii@" It is scorod-f2or rmabor-.. TPSATFMT OF:7DAT 1,, Proddot-ament correlations--are-the primiry7tools for the anavsit(@of -d@k@-- --Ml"trix of --Lnter-correlation3 wi I L- be-- used for,computing appmpria0te multiple ar4 partial-correlation3 and for factor-analkoi*.-- 2. Special indleas-have been-compnted frbm-ths- ratings for. ond6pogU, mosopenial -and, ectopenia beca-nse Of the o re t te Al, s I Vlif i4cance-iiiL@Ri4ldon-'-&--systoz-, 2 3, Similar: I-hdi-ce-8--hav-0- _been com-mted f olr -the torip0awntsti@---- coapononts d#tivdd-froia--,IT467 ston--S-oa47f6)r@7TOmp-e-r-amoht'l.- 40 Difference-scores will be com;nitod t@etwge2nt- @a-m cc--s-om--ato-tyj@@@pem*nU less sAlm--of temperament COMP(onentsi: 1,; - ST be Vi--Bc-o-ropeniai--F 0 SomatopohiAi de CoreVib&441 X-C2 as Cerebro3i$t ----X --C p- fo go SozAt6i6@isf--- -baoa,use- it- i-- antioi t a ed These difference,-sco".s -vgtqlprepa"d -p a- thtt for scite c-omiti,@e- ftatibiii@-thi@dif fettnces--between phyal(ris md- mper3a4@nt mavy-be-o@@04icti--v---e- We- dorlvatim3: an2d momtngs-of -t46b@6--icorG3 art explained-in-the@-- glossary. Other data vere collectld.@@r.@joots hyp,ptho3ia &s- to hcrd they would correlated vith-th8---"-a-3-Vr-eS arowid vhich-tho 3ttidy vas planned. ThWhave-been i-neltided in the correlation matrix the,- factor -analysis: - F-ead-longt 2o Read widthso - - ---- 3, SholdoAts "andtio" ratingso nliit4wwl-sc--O--resl L 114@: D 5 Pds Xf I pas Pto soi-.Xfa si- 7777777- 13 When N---a-46 the st&Ward error correlatim Is +-,149 if the po;Ailativ:>n correla-tion it atm=4d-- to be zero* Therof -ore, --C-Oo-f-f i6i6hU-a-c-orrol4tior@--vithizx-tlii3 range vi I I be -c orls id ii@n d-t c@@of - ins i gni f id dht - z64 followi"@tablb--Vill@7b47ii@@"for--g-a-u----I-----the apDroxidAte 1VVel nz--- --- f -th-e-Le-o@off 0 o2f signliicance 0 Levol of::@@@@ 010 405i .02-- -017774@005 Cortol@itt&i:c-oatiel4htf::@46 .292- 0347 .3P4 .4ig M,i@7MW -det4-o-d of not do-,-Al@Vith -that cii- possibili rvilinoat t6lationshio-,,jay-exist between 3omo of- mr dimohsion6-o-----I3ih--th6-ll36 Of-Sqo-r-es- f Or tiMO that we those caseu,,"ich--As th"i44Lf@i@@@oo in-thd7@bodded- tioire3 test, t2'ho-fiiigbr-maz4l the mlit6r%rdraviiial etc., th6--- tot--al tirse-takeii by_oach su -d-@rted to@-itt:Llog-aritha for correlati6na -purposess --that It vas NtiloLU@Attftpt---- Wit] o caso3l ve felt to estimate-either st4o4t tatistically-th6 pi@d-s6@-of curvilinearity -in the thciiawas of -relatimshipt.-, included in- this evi.Iiiated vith-VW' 3A9rst,anding-- t--the-re a3ay o-- o nazat ve6s" ncqir- u le Tbi$ Stddy--M-V--- -0-9--st- light-- dn the te"ibility-of repiijid-ating Sheldonts correlattbb4-@-betyeen Ot@Y@@@ razento Pt:@@ -- - -2- ------ *"Parir4 Lh*Uon-f-a-concepts-with a variety- o"the-r-psychologioal funotims, pittoms@@rdo-r:@@a-intArdepio@ndence7mav-arise so that differences betV"n-inditidualtLi"oaiting-2WA- tual funatims my-be to how to sharpen &teldorxts7d6neepts may grow, out -of -an tim of the.data in tho-opp@os to devise cognitive testslo;@:@@@VVMeh- aro-diffli@dlt falsify because they laco f 2& 2 Thia study740@-help-to xtend beyond modic,21-psychiatri t6--Dl,@nt within the roalit-.-of7 p-sy'-choto-gy--I;@ may offer n@6it4l- sy@- chological fdnotionse 2 psycholog"-W-ivi&41-diffo@@es* 30 If this study SUCDGed3 i@-OlilCIA&ktzilLn-,g-s-o-m-o-of the-inUi%- relationships--between stnit@@) cognition@_@-penonalityl- it 2 -611$* and Vill provide:oxporiwAntal@@@fo,r th*,d@66tritio of-h may also providt-&-nov-conceptaal-App:p@@f-or-Airther-studies,,- If It can be'deamstrated variances of: a varig@2@@@ogical ftnotions---can-be-acoonnW- for in term; of 5 if fe rono o 9 stabld- bA-6is --for psyohological-syst4m-bulAding. 10*od'i -Tfp-this--orte-ntl- the problem 7 of-aplan4tibh-vmld bo--B-b@nt4@4-t6-thp-bi-oloit4*1@-- am pr*vmably nor* controllabli--IiV@"-i-x-t@stsmo. 60 40 d6 far 2 S6 00 to C9. 0 f4 1, The axportment olo*rW::V@@Soots the tiypothosis -tliat. ondomorp)W@----- correlates vith--oyo-blink--6ondittMM9 -(soo it shova thatL@6yg@blirLk torditibtiftg--correl.-ites-@-at-better-than- the .05 worphy and mo3646@@@'Dio-!4ai6h f-o--r-thCfailiire-of--t'@-to--oxperi- ment to suppo.-t th*@@tliesis -4& b-a b-3--cau-se -ilot distinguita,a@ 2 between the-adiant@aM--Abiont-t,3ridoncio3 aseribal@@t"ndomorpliy- and eatcoorpl,.,y. a conditionin,,-:exp@erimont@Vhich7:11- measured in order to 2 able puff:of -air) -as tho iwex of conditioningg we liave apparently created Q @3itU4tiOn ln@@Ohich- -the- ect=orplil 3 tonclenOY- to v-itll@ draw4l o -tW ro.,,ii I ts- 3 t - W -0--- thin,2c,-e i lerato evon- seek- uncomfortable 3-it-ttatiOnS cram"@Uiposttires, and--the--- li!W -SQO%3 (bibiouat b, no C-Plosti@a@ ser% -2-13 't"h6th@endcqorph-3 mi&.t--. I 3- a -,m r -ihdt6ld'of -i-disc'omforting one. In any etrent, el6dtly@that o,,,tse eL 76YO@@=- blinl,. metasnre of 2 ith-4o!f@ratt"-.O,--for t 0 to.,.3pera.?40nt-al p. y vZ v h trait of derobi6t6@iii@7:(@t7 33) I*r4is is Nrther mipported by an -r of +.25 with tt,.o social of 4-tlio correlatos-+*50 witli corebrotonia. Other corrolati6ri@ of-e@y-d----- blink cmditioling which -att4Wtho-0-05 level-or-better-arot-- a. -,41 with age b, a ex c, -.29 with vi646iopeata (the differonce b-stween-andco-,Or"- aw::visearotonia)- - - -- -d. +.40 vith'tl@A.Mg scal,* Of - the IWI-: rn gnamry the parti"lA@t-kiM of CR evoked bY this gxW@"Atal introversicep yc4t,!,i, rcnndlo setup is ho,%dedness, a-featnoi4 scort ca the Kvl-,--,and-a-i@dency-@@ard aso*tioism. 2* According 2to the-s*oW-hyoothests m*3omor;>hy liag--Oxpeot*d to correla"ith-i@@@@ @w%- the f inggr: aazeo--- -T-wo-of th"* mwan " s of - De rf dt%Uc e- (time and minbe r of blidd --al 1 eX s enur*4) W:2 elated with--"@@bdbrphyl but-th4 -third-r"Oor ore7-uncort I of direation revers4A,*- was f (xind- to doorea.997 sigaf icantly -as- th* nesonorphy of-oag--tnbjoot3 inoreas2ed (r n--.3@"ed Firi-re 2). A partial r- ruling cut the -off,66t -of PSIQ brinsit- this uP to *-389- nearly sitnifi@6@t-at-tl*--@01-1*"I,---.4orewftr---correlatLou3 vith andcaorpby-&A-"tomorphy, vore nil 2 3h "rf orm!U A f IA&,6i,-aaze ta-sk, troodca- f row di-roo-ti-on royer3ala correlRte3- P03itiVOlY %iip ma3omorphylp It--also cor- r*late3 positively vith two WATS sub-t-ast-a Aritlim-atic. (2+-33) wa Objee,%If, AssembV (+034)0 IC-66-rrelat@6S-'+.41t vith NII-scals Iq and +-3? Vitli--0,6-tfo-rxame -0-n-tli-o--ombe@46dofto-ims-toot. It also correlates posit,ivel2t:@@-measures of -isaminga as froodta:ftwlino-croasines on mirror--drawingi i-,47 bo prc>fiototid"t inciden-tal-learnin&l +-35 oi&nJLf ioalnt correlations are f ckmd vith f enr of - ths7 %4Pr scales I as Ks -92 b. Ess- ------- Pal 17 one--3uggoative-findibZ it--that &!--the score for-- visoarogi (th differenea botwoon WoPenia and vi3coroporAa)-- grovs I the f roq--ue-n-cyY-a dtz"tion-revorsals 2- Increases. V-0 Thit correlation Is + 30, vhioh is sigydf icant at _the lov# I 0-0 is one of @thC@tWeral iWidati-a@frea-thisEiexporiment-that t2o--- some extent-greator than chance, there are-cogn fnneti which depend-Ahl@part m the rolationship b!3tween oness@@@o@0- and one's tompora=t. Findlog"f-thi- rt,_gL-)p!p-ar to be 3 so espectaIV-rolovint f-o-r-tho-@@lopmont of. a-itsef@ll holidtic psychology.- - Oar:@pTMnt scores for combinations of diadAaibM-(Stteh as viscoro3is) which- will be correc2ted for sibsaqi@@t anavsos of tJ-.o data.----Beoatise they _are either ratios or diff6-i@" 'ratibt-, they tend to exauerate difla foreno83 minimize difw femoea on-the other side* Tiiis flaw-has a re- aaalyol*. 3.- Tvo hypotheges-were made--coneeming tlia kinds of task3--,which would oor@rolat*-vith- 44torsotpby _k_Ltn neither-cajol .40mory--for- DVOIgn3 a2w-tho Katfta %tch@Stick Probl"s-vere the hypothoses ampported,o @kmory@@@@bigns corrolAted-O,-22 vitti- octomorphy aM vith-ordomorphy. - git-@t- that data:f roa.only 37 cases we" avallablo--mtgg*3ts tha"ith more data, viltiple correla- tiora fot-'.kWD t@atws*h ord@6o@@--and -ectocoorphy - sitht well "ach Bat of more ismaditlts interest is the -.39 correlation of-e-ndo.- pWa. this -is - silp@@ at ti@A -6--OIIA"l and 3trmglv x@i.cogta that performance on- this t,-,isk d64s vam:Nuh phys itne btit- ih manner not anticipated by onr theoi-y,, .VD orf6ii-oUO--,ilt"orrelator, Positivelv- with rote memory for nonsenso-sylla-bl*@i-(+.241_)-and with all three-finge'r maze scores @ (BAt -+040i@DPi +.---@31 Tiy4,ei -+047)4' It vas--Iypothesti@@-,MAt7Mf Icloney IA t, lie K Stick Problem w(Aild correlate with Otto26rphye- --- Tile - experitot2iv7 roSUlt3 clearV-reNtt--L-l@-e--b.@PoUi"is-both with rozard--t6-- peed -3 and accnracy of-- none ofLthe-thl**@:staM- perfor ard components O"hyst -2-e-c--o-r-r-e-lated significantly-Vith either perfor.mance'score-on thi"a-sk-. mesomorphy hold$-@lear ed e both *for spood@UO-::@irleY (+.e-.3 and +.2p.,- Sheld@6@@n irle s2cores a moasiim-of detailt@:6f which---! have not been pv@ii4W@@s correlates +42e7ih4--4-,29-with speed and aocnracy-rospectivolye The-latter@fitqre-is signifim cant at the. .05 level$ A stndy@@@tl@,o--statisti6411"i&nifii:ant correlation-s--------------- be@ween thi-s-task-.and---t',-.o other stady, evokog-some-P-1161*itb:!iY otlt@@- -Bacmise sncces3:At-the-- matc2h-stick; roble*$ correlates- with mesomorphic (+929)1 Ud somatotonio-(+,33)--ti4i@@@-it se@oms reasonable to hypothesize that-this-kind-of-learni"-ts-A specialty-of Agstes-0 sively naacnline men,-I)iit-thii- oy the observatidi7th4t tW-6h&6*6ro who snppresses his socnrity-sooking vi3earotonto needs in fuvor of a oore-aseetto orientatlon problo%3 Conver3OlYt it '-a the-ord6p#tW@@ describes himself -a2s. the@@Olffw inftlgant visoarotmic who does most po6vly-with thit-ta!ik- Here asain I:6ovideneg t6@@996$t that Sheldo:nls physical and tompgramental tone6gbi;ilizations may serve a in supporting-the smbsti@icbire of-6oZhitive f)lnctibns th.-"@n &a tot 2a i ld &teldon himself-t-m,-i-gtned,. O%lr VOr,/ faililft-to r$Plic, t.0 high correlations-between hysiqnt and-temptrament-may bo the el,@ie to &von more interesting relAtionsl,.ips-2s- itl-.-VarbAl IQ shecess-@@s tatk c6tt6lat6t--@itivelY@V (+.33), Pleli-scale:@IV(+-33)-DionY8i-an temperament and Tt @cormlatW-2--- the sim of -rindr c-- 4M(7,@@re 3 31) negatively vitl,,.-the Christian-tomper,2ment the raltio-- of vi3cerotonta to somatotonia tbe-Y, scalo of -tbe--- 4:@ill,ek- orformance m-the match-stick-iprobltm-s- -c-o---r--r-ol-ate-3- P931tivoly viv.-WAIS Simi at IQ lariti6s (,t.31)9 Verb ftll-scale .IQ (+.34). It correlates negativiely_,with-the index- for vi23earosis 4. pote le-.irnirig 0--n-ons-onsc -syll4bles- i,, t.he only- og ni t lv c- t a 3 k vhich did not -sl,,.cfw-4AY correlatid" -of 7iibte vitlk--"Ieldon't 000- jponents of plvsiT-ie,, Ilor, fO eilat matter did it-,Oorrel-ate r vith satf-ratthgt--Of te0era-ZeRt- to be a smidgeon-of lor6iiation whicli-provents--this skirmish t -r- r constititticnal psycYologYo P'r2c@- from being a -totall -defe-Ao fjoienoy at the loarning of nontohse syllables does negativol,y at bettef-tlian tIlO o5 lovol--with a secondary meamire of phvsiqnel-&eld6rxsi--racentl"ovieloped "gynic!'9 or feminoid-6---- score,, Tki'tre-are also thrje positive corre!,Ations to bo7glai@LnOT--7-- froci the intercorrelatton matrixt 20 @ oe a. ---Sj@@@the f liizrer maze: +-30 b.-- +.41 e,--The -PT-scAle.-O *1,33 - Onr original 1,4potliesis t:,..at-rote-lelarntn,&,-Vbwild -correlat-,*--Vith actopeni-a z--ist-be rejected* t'rier-a i!j no siqni difference between-Vie porform,tnce-s of-i@dt6t@6rpl7ts-@and ectopenes 2 on this task, R-@614orttt-LAtAtement th-it ootr.,taorphs-,iro poor- at rote laarni" -is cast 0 0 +.41. This is not-"r;@a-31ng In Uiat bot"-i t-tes@s-involve-rote-- r learnin.g 2of matertal-i&ith!Lt@@p esente-d vts,-, verbally. An ob"-rvat Ion tboiit@ the p e rf or;2anc oof cRi r@ si i bt r. on tri3 t,5kak .2ay--sitbsoqt-iontly-prove t-o-bod--of-'interost tl,.o larger piebire. Protteiency-on this task seems-to-decrease withage. TY,,o--t-ictth.-at-oiireorrelatton_w.As;only---.:27, ence not significant at be--dile to oiir-raltitiveIY777- narrov ase rangelf" -2e-N to-39. o mean_ago4@.ts-2e§2 and the_ st-i.v%dard devi,-Ation 71iis is obvicsisly-skowed-tovard the-- sidi- of_yoitthi@:@-@ hAd@@ distrib,ition of -Agos been more no.-Arly _G3:nssiani-the eviden2ce for a nogative offdot of -abilit"g have been snbitanti4ted-st4tisticullY;7: 5l In the case-of Mirror Drawingg both---Iiypotheses-roveive qqalified "pport from 9 a as tomorpby :corre at 03 + 4,-2 vith speed5 of pOrfbtmtince--(see Fifiire 6) vl@.ile ectopenia----- correlates -#26 vitti that dimension, li0wever---the difference3 21. in the correlation of -OP@W almg the ectomorPhY-OOtOPOnia caorphy-sandop4nia dimension are so dimen3ion and along --the, end slight that the- astion as to which of tlieso tVo di%OAtLO2O*@@-- is the better kr@@tor of--speod-of mirror-dravit@@-1,S left OPeto '4oreoverl the fact-that the three trAict@9--of -Physiql which are positively correlated with sp-toid all SnWOSS-endoMorphyl_arA the t2hree vhich arv-negativev correlatod-with Apted--inelnde---- ondozorptq tord to,--Wicate that a more-intensive-stady with a vidor ranze of somatoty ves and more@-mlbjeots-eight V*t the ondomorphy-ondoponi"itomion 2Is the best-somatotype indicator of tk"",Oittbr-dtavinge A similar sit-dation_ _O@@@@-t6-@-aceiiracy score f see Fign re 7) (>i h - or mirror-dming--( r _ypothosialthat aacmracy shoild7t@@@@to with--"sboorphv-is siipportedl-(+0-36). It is enhanced W7@kh#--fa-6V-tliit aesopenta shows-th@@hikh*st negative corrtlatib"ith aconracy (-.26)o (Theso-finding3 are -Wspe.oially in 2in--Viov o o narrov-!A"e@of mesomorphy samplt;- It does not seen nnreasonable-to in env -txpect--that---- from a sa4pl*.vhict@-ft@@"nts an average distribrition Of "SO.- morphyg st ta2lly lar@-comliktions miat to obtaino4)9 ibstant Bnt again -wh et-Vs compare Viose iindices-of physiqvie which correlatcpositivol"ith aomracy with those-utich *or- relate negati:vtly-- we-fird-that-vith more datas it might have be2en denon3trated -that Vi"tomorphy-qotoptni.a dia4msion is a better predictor ct-@tirr6ti@@draving acenraoy than the g*somorphy- mosoponta dim4nsion4l----IA-either event# the present-3tidy-indi"tes cloarly.t6hat performance on-airror-dtWing, both in tori3s and acenraoyl' correlates-signifi@6@tly-with somatotype.- 22 If one were to follow-Sheldonl3,.-thinkingg one might- expect that if:474co-r-a on-a-g-og-nitive k correlates-with--&-- compment 'of it ockild be expected to correlate in the same diroot2ion-vith-the-corresponding aspect of---tax orament. It has already been shcwn that- this is - 4Wneessaarily t;49 cases The scale-for-mirrorr@draving_Aqpn@-is a striking in- stance of a-negation of--th"bove mippo3itions- --Aoc"racy-cor- 2 r-olatos positively witti mes-omor biit negatively with. a, phy tonial its temperazonta.1 counterp@@_rt. tqd- -,-(In---this s Y-ImesomorpW and somatotonia-were oig6ntially-m@zorrelat@d-[4.04.)). In fact, with the-dif'f6-@@- twee mescoorphy: wid@@@otonial This f lnding seems -(piitii-i@l-a-n3ibl4 when translat647into-ordin,%ry langnato-@@a-@Fpixtmla physica2l potential to-i@@---a-ssertivel-aggr*,3sive action in-0--r--Oasos aw_as_ his self-rating for his-behavior becomes-more pa3sivo-and--cozz@- pliantj then hi@Ltendency--wperforts_oarefn!lY::@u@@r-a-tely on2 an learntngita3k will--increase. We feol-tl-,att this-statis:k@@ nnimpeachible finding is one of the nos provocative re"lts of-the prosent--stndyo--Like the vario"t -stndi6s -of the rela-tionshiAC_l@@een--pare@246ption_4nl---- personality dbhO-7iiCthe past twenty y*ars, it provid4s 4 cl"e as to_hov_to map the rkxna of Inter-rglattonships betvoon-the varims ftnetions of the organism. alt-it goes cne stop fartlier than.proviotis stndi*3 in-tha it-correlates 'a stable,,,phy;-@- mea@nire with both a cognitive &W a person&lity noaj-mrse -In-so doing, it points to hm we may-beeadon the bast of7oAy@"logical theory - aW -pottibly stabiltz*-this--base by'rooting it in a 6 biolosioal foki)iditiono- 23- The time diiien3.ton -ckn mirror-draving did ngt correlate at the .05 ltval with any other meamire-tt this-stndy. Eowever +.he aemrac@@@do-attained -.signi2f icant levels of correla-- tion with-several- o-thio@i@ dimen-sit6t%- ----Those not -menti@o-ned-,In the prtvi(yat-dit"66ton-ares at The-avoid-anea--@@@ys on the fiao-k maze b. Ttio-avoidance of directicn rever-sals@@thti:@ f Lotor maze (+.47). co The- greater _the---d-iff-erence--betwoon tl,.* sitm of tho souato- typ"ompon*nts and-tho@ gma of the, teepoc4amt 961f- ratings- the fewer the line-crossin gs do Thw:-greater- tht- dif between. ond6at@rAy and viscorotonIA-i@the favor the line-crossings 9. The & re at a r the d I f f 2 - bd@@@ e c t op a rLi a'- and - c-a rob r o- peni4l-th6--fiwer th4--lii4-crossings-(+.34). f. The-gr4kater the diff4@@@betwasn mosopenta and somato- pental th-4@--a-i6-r,-e-frequent-the lit4ecrossings (-#35)4, (7his-is-littl"oi*@LUan-a,ro-statement of-tha7jS@lat-ion- ahip between accil- racy -and the d if foremo--botween nos o- mor and----so2zatotonia)*----- 6,, W* inst-roject the @iy@th-6sit---that-@flt(iehcY-at--incidthtAl--- learning corre A e3-V th Reso ia (tte Fiamrs 8)0 The correla- tion is only +011 bnt--it is--the-big4o@"ositive-oorrelation between a sometotWpo task-o Moreover, inoid#nw le&ming-oorrelates with moscoorphy@@- TI@e- mnltiplo correlation t"281---Btill too-low to s4,tisfy-tw5% 3tuA&rd of sitaticames A more carefnl 3tndy:o;-this relation- ship n"y-yet either support-the original hypothesit or P,4 indicate an mltornAtiv-s bit relatod on*, vizei-that inoidentiil- learning correlatw&--ne ative with mosoisorphys The-present test Of the hypgthesi6---is -linkited- by@ th-s- -,o-2onstrioted - range- of masomorphy la7m"&-aple, the diffid4lti4s *nulled irt-promring scores for lncidd-iit-il oonditi6h@- and the deficion@"-oor weakness Is the easidtt-to itoprove. This will t@e 2done for the- f irial report of oor f indings. The onl"knifican corre-lat-i-c--n-s--of-inctd-ent-al-.Iearning were with direction_ rtvorsals on'the flAgO@@*aze-(+035)1--Rnd the-" tdl%lo-,,Of- the- XKPI (+.32.).; 70 The hypothesis wonld@ correlate with WopaniA is not only decisively rejeote&lbvit-roversed-by-- cR2r data, En@:@@lAt" negatively with2 #@4openia (-#33) . 9) - -A pgsitiv*ly witt.-andbko-rpl@(@+!3 (see Fig!tw a,ilar bnt weaker relati@6h@ht ---is f'o-i--m--d--betw-e-en- EFT for teap*ra-mento EF2T-correla-tes-to-a-signifibant-dogree with htad size (+434), ttires WAIS mib-tests (Di +,,34; FCi +.411 BDi +#29), all three f IA90)@-*z.o scores -- IDA-, +#331 -wf Times +,37)9:jlslQ--(+.36),-a2nd the Pa-agale of the- *PI Perforwmce on-this partit@ilar O@@OptniL-Wk is obvionsly strongly Despite the unqmostionablib7@fall,"iv of-Ofi-@thosig----thi d&tA indicate that this an aspoetallv "soNl--t§ol for fgrther stndy of the- int4r-rolati6dAhiW between strnotnre and frmotions Sih"- thib-7@k !La !Wi tkin at -al. it h" boon known that men consistently odt-patforca voaen-bt@-thit task* lib@7tatlsfac@*rY explanation of thib@--diff4j*aae-@yst been--Mposede- Onr cride me2asnre of head-size,--(Iength plus vidth) oorselates-at-better than the ',05.-lovolVith proficiency that mente-heads ha" abcmt 7% more-cranial capaoi IIZ.= womonts, I -may thd@Wore b6-lV@@6Ui6@-it4d tl,.-tLt--Oither-head or 30ge c ther capacity,. inter-pnpiII4-i" a ance, ate.) may,,L@@ f@6@@h of the sex varlAii":bi@@thi4--task. S. Althcxigh-thb-d2At"6:bbt@Mbo4*ivbd4lly smpport-coir hy"th"tt----- that 2,osistance-to th-e If.-lAii-on-correlates- vith oetcaorphy-they--d---iMi6kt"-sibiifi6,a@t-relAtimthi betv"n-- 2 -@o somatot.vpo-ard ans ion (see I?Ikiii4 10). ctir gitb Wto responses to th 8-tost-it::w6tt@@-anddpeniat so litt2le diff6@ro@r-co@betw,@" the correlations-botV"nLtt4se------ poles (-a22--and@4*37-)--tnd tliose faand be-tween7ectoztorphY a @rd 2 P9;)"nd go ectopp-La (+.25 a,,nd -.2@) ... that it behoovo3-,us - to-6iis ment until -aL iaorgzqii@r*N"tqdY@:is done- using -more-.,i,@ibJects and a botter,,,Apparat-as*- In the-ma@i@lle, it'is-of --ihtei@ost-Ito that the -dimension-6f:U@04i-@iiiiht--selfoo-ratings vhicli best- -ro---- dicta re3p-oA;o-to--this-t4k -i"j*brotonta-coret@@@ii@--(+641 and -*28)s the analdgqk::O@@om6tohy4ectopenial In this a -i@-st-thificant at better@than the 00.1 case, U-i'-difforence -Iovtl, 2 F6f7Otititnbjoots, resistance to tha-.14111e-i@-L-Y corrolat:o,s neia-tiv*!Y@@@aze (-,,3-1)9 negativo@W vith- of viscerotoniA7to carobrotonl@--(@..31) -aM vith two -WI scales 26 (Li -.381 Kt@@@2)0 It -correlates- positivelY--Vitb - Wo Otllek IOEPI scale$ (.'if u-4,*36; Sit +,38) and with ondopenia (+037)- IIYPOTHESES CONCE@MNO@f%!SIV2A:AXP:=WRA.'49NTt:::==- Viscerotonta,- +* @6 @138 ,39 Sollatotonta +*05- +.04 +.04- Cerebtbtonia--- +004 Our first hygoV*O* Is2 supported by the datal ondomorpwcor- rolatos vith-self"r tibaC:t@@@@ at far-bettor than the ,Ol lovel7@ibl-IV7@@@lates two-- acwa&totype co4ko4qpts-at the 2601 I*Vbl-o TA the case of a stoo thesis- oar data indicate no correla ti-on-s@AtLAIII- We think that thi3-na"tiV*--!4tiilt is not dits to tho-."L4ok-of::@@latibWhioll*WA@n-moscaorphy@and -sonato- tontal but 1. Ihe narrow-ranso--- of mosomorplr4@--ixi -our::aamploo 2. Tho cnidity- of att,6:apts _to _d6"lop a ,scale-for sonatot 30 @eing compo3td ,entiitly of-iiwsters and theol"ical a,!Pidents, W be expected to concerning the aggressiV6 asp@@ of -teciparment-than concomi" the otbar-two-aspoctse- Tho dAtA ttt671@@jtot_th@ hyo6thatitod relaticoship6 betyeen corebrotonia "d -phy@@@@ Carebr-otonials-co3@rolation-- vith ootomorphy-f"lt jnbt b-olow7th# 00@ 14v#l of-signifidahd4o 9 Ait Its correlitim vith motco6tphy it rdl-" " vith ond6ttorpby is significantly ra&atives in s"mo,-iry, otit of nine inter-correi.ati&,it) sevr4n-fit oiir h)-potheses-- one clearIVi@6'acts it (mosc,-4orpr@y-somatotonia), and oiie is ecpitvocal (ecto:.aorplh,,Y;@-@iobrotoplp2k). --bit t:,@i-- last item does attain-a sienificartt @o:effi t of hei,,It is particalled ot slige.ests thit@,Ct.e"ldon's Present metrod for ratit.;C--e@-,toinorpliy may tend to -Alle2ii@iti@:it- f -rc,a,--cerebrotonAl.,A by beip.- too closely tied to ULO iispect--Of -iiet Lt. (mi@6--t6f"lation bot-Nieen ecto- morpl,,y ard 1-.ei6,lit is 77). 2 -tnd In view of t'.-, instrimortt for ooamiring tompera@wnt, ,te t.),ie ;iT*sont-iemilts ire good onotlgl,@@. to-@hictiry i more intensive stildy-witil a instnimenj :on@@aLmore--m i-esentative p6piilatioii. aibjects vl@F-io rute thetdselV&6-@hieh @ in viscorotonta tend to be scored-),,I EO.ola6r.-@@a gynlcAcil67(-',,37). niey do rela-tiv,,-O-IY aW DS::(--74@30) on til.0 Wil$o On the ltVlil@@@se-ore-hi&li on ..LA (+-34) and-low 61-1 lit-7( aibjocts who rate Yt&, in soa.itotonia make aoro2 orro --thd mlitbr-dkaving to-9t':(+*30)@l:mlt score more oneco3soz.--on-Um .9 -(+-3"'t)- Skibjects-vhd rate tliems*lves as hiph in.cerebrotcoia tend to be: the younger -ones (.,.61). Miey rosist -the 'iilLe-r--l.,ye-r- Miision (+.I@1). MiW_ao vell cui the PW-m-ib-test--of tho WATS (**36). 7hoy condition roadily-to-the eye-blink procedlire (-to33)0 On the AWI@-@brotonta -coft3ol,.xt#t positively vith the D (+.46) and th#7:.<,i (+7@5o) scalos, biit neeati'vely witl,.-tlio K (-.34)t lis (--3e), ard-ity (@,41) seal",- c 2P- - IIYPOTHESF,S C01i'Cgl-'MN-V-Pj'IYSIqUE %ND INTE73-LIGEWHI The 14;@TS Full@@@ale-IQ correlates M..)@ with 0.0 vitl,& mesomorp!49--aM vitti ectomorpi-ti. results do not att,-Ain signific.mce, tL6y ai;roe rt6d firidiil;"Is rt- PC, of I)otli ablo to cc4,icliid4ILv,-,At when-intalligerec- is copsi,.ered ,a staal'L biit stiblo eorrol--@,tton--o S---b-e-tve-ert--it und--An -iridox- of the lineArtty-iind/o thonta -And/or tliin-riess- of--,'rlys!41-30 But .13@,eldon's-presentmet@,,,od of-i@.'4ting tllis--aspect of:w3iciie which lie callsf:i@4tt4oto@6--@@6trol@ites with-FAq7do6htially77777 becaiise of its common v!-irilince itself, correla-teA@@.31 wit.-t-Fsi 2 via, ectomor --I,.eld--6o-nst@i6t Therefore height, the- more-parsimoni- atsl,v for tl,4o-incroment -Wiq:Vt@Uh-l@@@@tited@-wit)@-Lao-tomorphy :in oi2ir dzatag -.05-levet!7o-t-better with performamce:on -And learni"-t'isks, Zhese aret 2. Fin,or-mitze blind-alloy 0 c _@av idan 0: --t-33 3-2 -O'iziger-r4,izo-directior,-roversal-avoidancei +.44 4. iiii,,,Per@mAze speedi 6* 29 HYPOTliESW CONC&MNG- THE P-ELATIOliqIIPS BETWELI WlilS-SUB-TEST77--77 SCORES AND PHYSIQUE- AND--IBETWEFN W,'IIS SUB-TEST@ SCOUS-AND@:T NPE14A'.,iENTI- 2 At the -time of this vritin,,,l the available-scales -f6t@:7- endopenta, assopenial ectopenia and tl,,eir temperamental--C-ounterl.!---- parts are weakened@@ a ratibiial limitition'vhioh prevents -ttem from being u3ed-ihLALdtfinitive do.-.a--thorcug4@- check for relati6h@ffiiWbotween sub-tost scores ard-both-0)@Y@@@-- and temperaments Ilieref6te- fih4"tatements;coneeming this part of the 3tndy will-)i@ive-t62-viit anti-I the-. revitdd--3calb@t for C*rWn phyti@@@@tt!OtameAtat acts have-beenLoor!@@@@-- related vith:th@@7WAIS--datat However -it::@@ ploisiblo to expoot tb,.-At-_vhon- th--o2--now corrolations.&re7@available, they Vill---p-r-obably high as the prosezt ones arLd--ii6-@@e--diroetions.-So-thbL@ followins initial@-ftbdiiigs from a pre304Wavailtulo-@@1--amo-- 2 tion natrix are 1. Components of -DN(-i-c-- h correlated',significalntly with -9 - Die ave V.ree WAIS sub-test-S at th4C;:G@@ or bottori-- - 41 ,a PA correlates@+ 3"ith ectomorpby! bo +420 c. D6 correlato"03 w ao omorphy:, +,,12 A3 in--the -OAs@@ of the correlation betveon YSIQ -and ec"orphy, the infl@14hdo of heiglits bf its participation- in th2e score for *otor4orpliy, seems t-o-be-the main phy3itAl----- correlate of - higkLP§-@ros o 9 WtiaV-f--for-Ds and-actomorphy vit,h hol&ht rnled ont +012.----T6 -@t-loss-o-r doaree-p- this is-- the ea-so in tegar6d--to PA7W4-BDB A partial t@for-BD and- mosogota vith height mlod out Is only ti,'e",Oo A parti6-t r for- PA--an-d------- ectomorphz viu,-hoight -nited CA-it is on'Ly+ 19,,----- 2, Foqr --At t'-ho 005 IOX&I-or botter v components--of@tdt"taments pa a* C-@t6rTelates ie37-@2With Vi@i-coropenia-- +931+ b. D c6rrel:ttoo -We t"itic-@ppnia 337-- -@vith viscarotonia@@--- "12 DS correlatos- -,30 -641,ebrotont-a- 2 d,, PA correlates -t 6vitl-. +1136 2i4::d@t,ition of Partial--its in ;order--to -imile @@6it -the--- infl-nence of-h4i@@@-rednced-the correlatibo between crebrotonJL47bolow the-.05 level2 of -significance.- At analysis of tho7ditA, PA-1@-@-- tlie only WA rs mib4@@ vhich-alhifests both a:signific@@ht correlation vith a dimension ct-ohy*@@ @cant-corrolation with the corresponding dimension of several2 other snb-tests h thQso--@:oritoril--vith onr pproac presently - avallabl6 -s-coros and vhich m--ay ---meet - tbjwvitli the nev scores. @And-_azain, the--.Droblom of-@@@tricted -range of type ra5tings in-our popnlati6ti may acconnt-for-the paiicity of significant rst in tht@-@@. The presently available result@@- -of pilot -project should be evaliiatod--Iuithin-tli67@@@xt of these-lit4itations and cautions*. 1* Several -of the -1,nrAp46d dimd"ita8 vliieh we -bav6@::itsed f or-, this anal:($1-s- contain k -weakii"s iWi@@tii"oir-tharact-er as ratioso- This-h4A@ been-mon-tioned- earlier Ihese ratid"l "nee-scores-utiia.--- more nearl"p roxi4it4-Lth@@@nations - and-whi2cli shciild------- give mom:::Accnrat4-- ldbires of --the - lii@relatt between the-conce t"iiieli th#Wscoresireprosent-and other dimenstmto-- 2, The small:tqtiber- of ---s-,-t2-tbjects makes it- for curvilinearity-or relati6@ftshipse 30 The inocaplato aM sbt6vhat iinreprosent.Ative--range of somatotyko::Kores-in-onr sample-tiiggests-that.vitr,@@Cmo normal:; 2 the obtained:rolattonships coiild be cpitte 4. Mo homoc,,eneons-charaetor--of Ckt-r-3amplaireprosonts both a 3tron,.,th and a-me-aknos-s--of UeL st;il The latter dye - 2 qnestion findings-to the general----- popit!.atibno One resmlt of this 1,,ozogO"W of so4ple is t.@ie high verbal-idtolligence scores of crtr vtbjeotse Boe-wso slgbjects fropientl 4 .y approached or "hit the--66iling"-of-theso sub-tettal nnoorons correlations vbi&i did not meet the ,stamdara- tests of stenif io@d@mipht conooivably, -have done so if the ceilings of tho mlb-testa@-h ad boon higher. A_ "bsoqient al.,aalysis vill check for- this possibility--by-- usin,&--the--i%tll ranzes-of -tW2ETS-!Wificati4xi--o the WAISS 60 A.Ithcueh_oleld4@nt-6--scores havo been at-=dttdizod to a high degree of - -reliability,, it is p@poible that-vith modifica- tic.nt in voightin,,,7s__6f@-@@ata frco vhich 2 tvpo scores-are compnted, phygical indi6"7Vhich--are psychologically @d@6@@ngbil-dly-be derived-.----- tration of -this- possibility is the case of. ectomorphy_vhicb.----- correlatti@-be-ttor-Vith t6rebr6tonia after 2it3-hi h relation- ship vith- height is Poi@@Lthis k"irpose p both pondotal indicdl--and tnink indices vhich, &lo-n--g--Vith- height -are the7"in source data-fo-r soj%aLtotyl@@@s vill be-inclnded in tho-hbxt anal"it@ It may-vell be to f ind learntng and tasks -vl-itch@!4re- isore pn roly @@ptdt-@tative --of - a-f f dttiv#-@- conativo--- or--doZ"ve @VSed in 2 _p_ropensities--than the om3 the most strik------ i@ag of the Boston Scale f -r T4-m-p*to@04t, Th67l*6itlts- of an 0 lndepend#At-att6Wpt to d*VitC2A7"lf"-ratiDg scale will7s-6- bo availablo-foklthis pirpose. With-these limitatidtii-in-minds A rovigw of the fat#---of onr hypotheses ecocerning loaTpApg &rAd physiqna shows that two, of them, the relati2mship of-finzer-m-3.ze perfomance to,moso- morph,y and-the rolationship of airror-dt"ine errors to atsomorphyp;aro acceptables Only one hypothooL,*$ the rolatiork.- ship betvion ectopeniii and t?W le4ittY4--6f --nbnsorize- syllablets- to rejected vithokif,, -aW possible alternative explAnAtion.9 TV6 2 hypotheses are--rejected, bnt--in --- -a non-tiypotl@.asized-- relationship va3 dogreat le Bye-blink ccnditionirv,, did--not c6Y"late-with ondomorphv- bnt did correlate vit,'r. 29 '49moty-fdr-2D46ims did- noV-6-@lat"itl,.- ectomorphy, bnt did odt"14to with:WbpOia-%-- Cne:learn,ini task iggestive corral-a- tion consonant-vith:lthe hypotl,.ests-o--Tliis is the relatim3hip r --Ihd ea --orpby@@-, between air'or@@dravina tijo tom Two'other-hygp-o-th4e--ses-aro rejected,-tA3t-altematives----- which are snggest2ed by-the datal I,, X4tcli-stidk-t6-it-7gerf6i4ai@o dOO3 not ectomorphy-bnt doe* correlate snggestively with maso-- morphy. 2, IncidentAl- blit doos@@orrelate-negatt @ly@@@*@63omorpl,4-to a- mig&esttve -dearoos in thd-@@f onr "6rft(-i@otitai tasx*@ the Ezboddod-Figiii-e@k Test correlated instead of-i@-Wativaly. this significant correlation -f IW71ii-Ui"ace of - the- bypothesized rel4tion3bip, Snseeptibility tb-the --.'4iller--TAyor vith Its hypothesiz4td atpeot -of btit not to a significant-7- 34 degree. Inste4di it correl4t6d-Si&if icantly:vith endoponiav a r6lated Of th"in-c-hypotheses concerning theirelationShiPs- between p@hysi -and@-temperament, three predioted-PO3itivO 2 .qua correlations.andl&ix predioted--eitlior no correlations or-nega- tive ones. of7the fittt--three, one was snpported itnecpiiVdoallYs one was jnst.as-clea@@@jected,- while a tiird-had--to be re" jgoted because@Lthe-co2rrelation closely approa.ched-bnt -did not qaite attat 05 of -the n the __,,Jevol_-of-@ign-ifi64hc-e-. hypotheses of ni -o-r---n--e-gatlto ttlationships were-accep@ed,, Oiir Verib6@@2@@thtses concerning the relatibrithips between intallitOOo-i physique, and temperament Vs tentatively. Iiam -sn$gestive bnt statistically insignificant relationships--vero fdttnd-@-@Three WAI,S-snb-tests (PAI_BD $!A-DS) co2rrelated Si ifidantl-----Ith-hysicpxe. Foitr-WAIS-snb-tests y v p correlated si ifid4ntly vith-t"porament-(Cl D,--PA,-DS),-- Qnly PA correlato"ghifida-ntly@vith-both "6tp(non@-@hY'@l-crie and its correspQx4ing'component of-t6*W=Ont.--The low-D6sitive correlation-between-IQ and--linearit;y-(ectomorpny) previcisly fo,and by both-Nace4tati--an4-Sheld&i--Ws ropl@gated, A more-thorou&h cliscussion of Ve re.sult-s of this 3tndy should avait refined--Statittical analyti6-. --In--the-moanwhila seems apparent tliat-there are sienift6ant relationships between pbysiqne and psyp@(@ical Ainatidiit@-at several-diffei*n-t--levels----------- and that the-present_method--of-inv"tigating these,relation- ships is worthy of-fnrther exploitattb6@-@ Sevei-Al "Iiimped p4r44at6rsti--vere devised-from tle-scoros-- for somatotype f or t@e f ----1 ting pir,,o,,ke-o corre i Vloz3 wit.',,. t:-io-scoret@:@@r@:"at ve and-p"sonality-mo--i,,-tirost @.-C W- ln:.W;@iChLth6Y Their maaninz@vwit@t-A,.n -9"Oldbll!:t@@teM --I-n'L were devised are-listed bolvel: 2 S cqo-moas-iiro- is 'rhi OPOM a eridft6 distanco at ii';,dcb subje^t--St@Vds fi@oq the,,Pnd-b"TPII.Ic, extroae# r@,.w-bonod-nriscillAtit2ye, S. t@@.o- MO r-O orlthe- mesom distance at-vil-kici-i a 2*rs--m stands-ff6c3-the-jzosomorp@lic--extrome. The tend"n y-toward weaIM6ss--@Md @§2-oftnesr-7,-@f -pt! i 10-0 3. Ectoponiz-i--( is thet@:-moamire7of the distance -a"ioh a-person stands from the@@eetworpt-te extremei TIAE tei-uter4y toiiard viscer 4. Dion2ysi4nisti Co.-ebrotoni;.i the distmce at litm-3elf brotonic:oxtro.z4D@-@@kO@Ne, expressivo,-@out-,-,oing- Prometli0anisl-( visce 2 the dist-ance-it wllich--.-- persoii rates himself-fro@,o the visoorotonic- extreme. U@.4- bold. advenbiresome ii-ardy tomperaient.-- 6. Christianism- on A is tile aeasitre- of the distance at vhidh -a person rates 8himgolf-from tj@ip. som,,Atotonlo-o,xtremo. @36 7o Vise4roponLi4 (endomorphy less vise6rotmia) is the me ii sn re of how greatly 1 3nbjqotts score fot-endboorPhY-eXqeeds-llis self-rating-in vi$CO-r--O@oni,',- il@@eaticism and ti 10 denidl of needs for physic-al socuritye 8. Somatopenia-(me;6p@mhy less somatotorxia) itfahe oow yreatly a sub ectl"core- for wesomorpi-,y 2 solf-r,ating ih74bdat6tonia. P"@Aivity and t@ie--deni@k"f 9, Corebrop oni4-(ectomorphy less corobrotonia)@@ts- the moasure of how giea,tly--a---s-iibjectts score for--e-atomorp -@excood@rhis--- self-rating ih--dei,@abrotMid-.- denial of i ive needs, 10. viscaros is-(endoponi-i 16st Prom6th-eAnism) is -Vie me how Zreatly a-snbjectl"el-."-ratings for,Pr6d@i@@al-are exceeded -bt@@s 0-ndopeniat Syl$@itic- r4 and excitement*- Ile Somatoro;sia-(moso ent-a l@&bs Clristiani@-m) is the-ti@-@-re-of __p 2 how sreAtl@V@@J6ttli solf-iatizig-.s -fo-r--igChftdti@ibitm aro exceeded by his mesopenia. l@tagg6t4ted aggressiVenos3 and tension to dominat@e. 12., Corebrosis-(eotgpppW less- DidWianisaa)'. is -the -measilre--of how gre.-Atly a subj6dtls solf-ratiiii@@-for'.Dionysianisr3 are exceeded by Witlidraval into- tho-,calra --of one Is inner-life.