Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RD,P96-0078BROO1200050004-l Dear Dr. Puthoff., 21.February 1984 Vve now read and thought about Your memo on documentation the whole picture. According to my memory as to how it came about that.we landed in this present Impasse leads me to make thelfollow'ing.statementso for whatever they are worth. At the time when we had culminated the prototype training patterns with the first three volunteers, I myself held forth on the fact that we then should not any further advertize to other clients that training was tentatively available until we had seen to at least basic forms of documentation. As it came about however, the project as a whole was then in one of its many funding cul de sacs,, and since another client was hot to begin trz~ining and had money, a joint decision was taken to go forward in that direction. This decision was mostly taken by the COTR at the time, but conditions suggested to all that there was not much choice otherwise. This then'. at the time, was not ali that erroneous a.decision. I., however,.in my position as consultant., advised that documentation was, under those conditions likely to catch up as a problem" and we would never thereafter be abie to conduct documentation procedures in an orderly manner; and further ,when that time did arrive., that the entire team would have to be mutual supportive of each other, and ensure the time and space to put in the documentations that otherwise had been set aside at the time., for the reasons above states. The lack of d8cumentation, therefore,,vas not exactly an oversight, as is currently being suggested; but rather the result of decisions taken at the time to keep the entire work alive. I further advised that the danger in commencing training with the other group was in that the training would be seen to be workable, and that when this was.understood that this special group would come forward with inereamed.funds arA 1ASY-samot Ma-ftPow4p i(mc whisk would imply that'wo would have-to forfeit R&D and other Piliged work in order to provide the deliverables which would be expected under the working mandate. We arrived at this point a short time ago. The trouble is that no one wishes to decline funds whitm in order to commit themselves to other areas - ultimately necessary. On top of all this now exist the Pntpgonisms thnt have come to requit. If therefore., you wish to ho..d yourself solely to blame for Pll this, thAt is your businesq; but it would be my oninion that you need not and that indeed to do so is Just addino- one more incorrectnesslinto an already large haap of them. Approved For Release 2000108/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO1200050004-1 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 C.IA-RD,P96-00788 ROO 1200050004-1 -2- In fact, considering the peripatatic course of the overall concept of the uroject as a whole, the many different difficu tie It has consistently encountered, It would be my be4ief that under bach of.the.changing situations., almost ail parties concerned did more than their share to keep the project afloat at all. The current situation is one that has come about from critics who seem to hold.that all the work should have been perfectly done all along. This in fact was never possible; and1to try to make haste, safe face where no face-saving is really needed, all with limited and very small resources for documentation - when indeed a rather large effort is required is, in my opinion, to continue to be dismal and umproductive. But, in whatever light various people interpret it all, the fact is that for several reasons each of which were valid in their time in the past, what went down at each of those times is what went down. I don't truly think we can change that history by trVing, amid increasing antagonisms,, to conduct uneconomic gestures,in the present. Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO1200050004-1