Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROOl2CM$~GM2S4GOVER14 M ENT memorandum DATEt 29 May 1987 REPLYTO ATT" OF, DT-S (Ops) I sumircTs SUN STREAK Utility Assessment Report Projec, (U) TO- DT--5A 1. (S/SK/WNINTEL) In response to a request for information SG1A concerning six separate SUN STREAK sources were tasked during the period 4 to 12 May 1987. 2. (S/SK/WNINTEL) The following is provided as raw, unevaluated information. These sources have provided reliable information in the past but the veracity of this data cannot be established by this office due to the lack of sufficient target background data. a. (S/SK/WNINTEL) Source #SIR-a- was interviewed twice and statted substantially as follows: During the irs interview source reported that the -%&JS."ws d wi 1 rocky eCs~scrubj,~pe environment ith gul ies and ls. Structures were present which had an officiaTT, military, government feel (not further identified). An object Was also present which may be mounted-on something lf-ki~-shock absor-b-ers R~ne-'-&t'e-d-''--with the p o 'MOU~g~'k~- th 'o 4, Nir (meaning a 60 a-.- a t the object acr -t' f' i-tself does. t necessari1Z_m7vme1P hrough the air). 4olot"'A'-, ~"- ~- WARNING NOTICE: SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED HANDLE VIA SKEET CHANNELS ONLY SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED CLASSIFIED BY: DIA-DT DECLASSIFY BY: OADR OPrIONAL FORM NO. 10 Approved For Release 2000/08/08: CIA-RDP96-00789ROO200031 OOQ MRIZ111 R (41 CFR) 101-11.6 (:~Pr-PPT "10--114 t For Release 2000~~8" QIE~ Fla:~%-00789RO02000310002-4 hour f A A '" T~CAS-- Outside, dur-ing-thr, hour -- I a crew (not further identified) was ad4usting... packing, preparing and loading thS:.gWect. There were sowe lights shi ing on the object, but limited-so as not to attract attention; oLhe-idea of qJX.ht-M"s ing of - he a8tivity. There was a.sense of urgency, a time wl-nUo-w-w7'erein activity mat-y--no t be starte d P --- 1-07-11~- gl=57-to a gf-ven time a-nd--Tu"st be terminate r 0 a given time. The time available was severely limited - A , during w5"fTh-`Ro 4?&Nmm* event occurred durLu this time Yt peop e we-f-e-aviady from the object except for possibly one man. The event, which occurred sometime in the past (not further icrentified), enti7iled the object be n- run ug a g- nd run down (not further identified). It performed and then-was stopped. At another time, closer to the present, another event associated with this Q.Wect took place. People o erved this from a great distance'--a-s-'-Tf it were a fire 29=r demonstralion. The event seemed to"lme" an ef-f-elctstest the significance of which was partially the unusual distance involved. A tar t structure was involved and the object was connected Uffia d~s-i:i~uction. During the test smal 1 -puffs appeared around-the target prior to an intlemnTe , -bright, burning magnesium-like sparkinZ,which appeared to climb from-~Fh-e~ base of the structur'-'e-'-io the top destroying 11: -ii-iong so 3. the way-7leaving only framework behind where 6'1'1cr-- iWN-K-before. There was no visible path from the source object to the target structure. This unseen Rath did not seem to be line-of-si ht During this dVent the object n Zf +aEt were in=e reste7 on -a ;lace afFd ther no people arod-n-d it. The actual effects that.were delivered in this pr-ocess. involvj nd 1~ wa7=s ~a uEhimz--and pulling of minute q j;~ojxents, perhap. odXfc i -nq-s m _~..molecules, pr &l bends. The gregiate effects, however, were extreme. The eff-e-ct- causing phenomenon itself (from the object to the target) had some degree of directability but exactly how much and how acc i-77-lght be, wa~g "not certain perhaps because this effect-causing phenomenon was not v sible. The results of this particular test although not perfect and perhaps providing mixed results, made thoA present ecstatic for the ha th fact that th happened at all. t he secon During the sec interview source reported that the effect- iIng enomenon, which was not visible during n e travel, arrf-v-ed at 7Traveled to?) the target from a .-d 1rook-iion-al-mos t- Para I I e 1, to the horizon. it roilowed-a Wiggly-'course'-to t-he-target, kik~ ~Ihtning. "olt. There was a sense 0t 0 EQ'mpnnents -involved --a- designator and a cause. The cats ~41 -8~Yec-f---w~Rs f unily-shaped with varioU`Z---'-- p-rocrusions, angles, and substructures. It was sugfprted on li~-gs/o-u-'C-r-ig'ge-rs/la'ndi-ii--g gear, as if it were spring oa de _a or bouncy. There was little internal empty space; wires, cables, circuits, electronic parts, guiding/controlling/ 2 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO2000310002-4 f4---,%% 7 r. P r 7 1 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO2000310002-4 projecting mechanisms, and perh±ps IdentificattonFriond or Foe (IFF) circuits. Because the system operated so rapidly, ~en~ -_ Mental specially designed IFF was necessary to pre acc destruction of friendly or neutral targets. Part of the object was capable of rotating or affecting rapid directional changes, pernaps Bluing or elevation. The .,qbject-snalde a w=rring.soun..,-, and se-e-m-e-d-t-o-Me- mQbile/., &able, and w , self contained but required F6-plenishment after prolonged use. S&ids-(not further identified) were required that were involved in sUblimat n (solid-to- vapor), reactions. There was a very invol process of recharging a spent unit, unit-for-unit replacement, a c5nnect-ing, disconnecting and-switc),ing. Again, when the object was in use there was an instantaneous effect.; Frackling sc7und. burninz. verv -brizht-f-lashiag - like Wei-ding or sparks, acrid Ismells, charringL, fusing, burning and snalli g. AdditionalT-y, the-system was not always cfe'-pendable; there were design bugs and mixed bles-7fW". It sorMEMSOM embarrassingly f&j Pd to functi2n, usually because of'-i-sub-system pF6blem (not further identified). It was so complex that optimum performance parameters were seldom q2" letely met. Dehigners were working to correct shortcomin-gs, but this was problematic because of certain physical principles having to do=w th operating capa`E`Mties (not-f-urtger identilied). (Several days after the formal interviews source was asked to clarify some comments. During this period source stated that he was unsure if the effect-causing phenomenon described was r particle~beam wqaf~pn, or physical lik, eneri-e'tic like a laser 0 e 9 even something.stranger l-ike& an artillery shell or missile 60F_ kWl1 lightning.)l Source provided no further amplifying information which could be construed to concern the nature and scope of the SG1A project's potential for -success, or the project's strengths and weaknesses. b. (S/SK/WNINTEL) Source wag"A interviewed twice and stated substantially as follows:, LOD During the first interview source reported that the site involved %gn-'~ea h='6overed concrete structure.-', Inside, just below ~ PrMun"217vel, "wisi-a conl'~al object `tlie -Side's of wTIMT were mace of a hard plTs_1ic or g Le like material. Something i`nside''t'he object raphit - i ing like At some-time in was urning--or spinn a -guy",. t h e % f u -E-u--r -e-TE-e-13-5-3 76"Ct--V a s 3 u t'~ 17371"ro~f the structure. Associated with this object was an t which was .characterized by a red/orange/yellow glowing mass 3 ------- ffim Approved For Release 20~/69/08': "C-IA-RDP96-00789ROO2000310002-4 Approved For Release 2000/08108: C IA-RDP96-00789 ROO 200031000 2-4 m vi in a o 59 rving during what appeared to be the ns of_darkness. e was an event (;"c3t MM -identified) prior to this one. During the second interview source described an e.=t which;., i'~nvolved_a brilliant white flash and eressure`shock wave and which occurred-at, or just above ground-16-vel. -7E-e--Va-rget area was open and'-similar to a,r. 3ert- ~'environme.nt.~,,. The event t6__b-u_t__n_o_V- exactly like a typic-aT explosion (not further identified). The perpetraC6-r-s of th.101--event. felt relieved that it was not a failure.. but also felt. that it produced unexpected, unus`ual or confusing results (not further iden-tified). After the formal interview source provided a attached sketch (TAB A) which does not necessarily reflect his impressions during the interview, but rather his own concept of the situation at hand. Source provided no further amplifying information which could be construed to concern the nature and scope of the SG1A project's potential for success, or the projec s s rengths and weaknesses. C. (S/SK/WNINTEL) Source'~01§A Yas interviewed twice and stated substantially as follows: During the first interview source reported that the "te involved a (earthen) dome-shaped structure wf~ich_"enged in w1th Lhe-SU roundinjz_fi:~~6una. There was--an e-xperiment or series of exi2eriments-w-ld-ch appear to have Vltgen .P1 witl7in this structirr-e. These experiments involved an object above the floor. During one of the experiments =_s--~-aaen - . 1 - P d in the area between the ob ressure happene Lect and the __ ' _ ___ _ (_n_o_C T f.f9 o r Lrther described) Tge- inside of the structure V__ - eareq--dark during Vhe experiment except for an area UP around this-6-bTe-ct which was W I tro -god &&g " verX br4ght. , This experiment seemed to the flr.St i-n a,ser ot- steps. This experimental step may have been attempted several times in the past but this time 'it was suVessful (not further explained). In the recent past, -C6r near future), a test takes place in the open. In connection with this test there WF_ a process of eKtrusion, a draping or Eullin up, as if sor, thing was proauced from a Oreak or hoie in a 0sm5`lid surfaef (not furTh-er identified). During the s~t_c_ond interview source described an open area below ground within which there was a bluish &gr -=Woo ift i~lk~41,,_rabiating from a source (not further identified) u r i n Z-a -Ule This rest"Ii s conducted during the hours of, occurred sometime 4 the Wast. A rep-e-a-ted 7~3_P_PjL uZ__poise was associated with this event. At =aater point in time there wa another eve-n-t-7-During this event 4 1. Approved For Release ipxwrvpr-96-00789ROO2000310002-4 _?SET R r. I Approved For Release 2000/08/08: CIA-RDP96-00789ROO2000310002-4 All possibly fractions of an inch, there was a very am column of i,nteuisg ~ki fif benea&b thS gXoungJ whIch was accompani -d-b --l-oua cr7a-ck i n g /Ponn I n-p- sound - e V a and, again, the M I f u z z 2: b l0A7__H_ I - A-L-ii-Fit spreadina out into the open area around it-.- There was no sense of explosion connection with this phenomenon. Above ground and centered over this area a very big (miles in diameter) frisbee-shaped, transluce nt, whitish cloud suddenly appeared and the sound of whump came from unierground (see TAB B). Interviewer dote: Source felt he was perceiving an test but felt strongly that it was not a nuclear tes Source provided no further amplifying information which could be construed to concern the nature and scope of the SG1A project's potential for success, or the project's strengths and weaknesses. ---------- .d. (S/SK/WNINTEL) Source.#021'~,' was interviewed twice and SG1A provided the following informat on,'*much.of which does not appear to be relevant to During both interviews source described an iso ated barren k; - . __ - - area with a,warm dry climate and I stj 61mur-A-rZ. 'A qY m jor portionor*'-6__n~e structure was un er round.--When asked e re u n aq e "rg, rur' Wo stru wa's ren~cec"~un~jz e ar)E`roo~ o Lies an occurrence ur ng e per o 5 ~ipril 1987 to r r ~cu~ 15 May 1987, source described an underground r.umblina/exclosi4 which resulted in physical destruction pnU--:t_ra-n-tTc-personnel activity. Source's first impression of the cause of this rumbling/explosion was that a mistake or miscalculation had been made. During the second interview, however, source's opinion was that the rumbling/explosion was the result of internal sabotage invo n the release of pressure from a - _IyL_Z_ Source provided no further amplifying information which could be construed to concern the nature and scope of Project ROSE, the project's potential for success, or th!~,bproject's strengths and weaknesses. e. (S/SK/WNINTEL) Source #07~:9\,was interviewed twice and stated substantially as follows:E- During the first interview source described an isolated W- natural area with a circular area/structure which appeared t`5-E_e__b_oM-`m'5rn made and iiatur2~i___Th_T-E~ -may have been-. a,.,. t1-1--r- lbrci~xir.;~U a hidden area, or perhaps a ha J. u r a iiT_r sed by man, st,r.ucture.that was not always occ6pied. This area/sitructure had a rim and was slanted. Sometimes there was a::'shooting' qff within this area whii~h made the area hotter. Inside and underground i,n'this area/structure'th6rZ -were men who-were 5 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789ROO2000310002-4 r_% rl~w 0r1% Approved For Release 2000/08/08: CIA-RDP96-00789ROO2000310002-4 moving about, walking, observing and overseeing (not furthers explained)- There were two important underground areas. mpression The first ga;;g ight co rom e Th sLs dark a;ie,per down under the floor'. e CSF45~0~ area wJ (MaNaALM - - area/structure. In an area unspecified by source) Chere Was an ObJqct that was rotating and irWgJXed a- movipg baak.W -Thi,s object firea and then the-T-i-rings vanished. .a.rds - This object could not hit high AIJUUoes but cot~ld hit fast (not further explained). At some point in the fixture In specified) this object looked better (not further explained) and was bigger- At this point in the future the object/device, now apparently outside, was working correctly i-n th-a-~C-iC'-~as straight, more precise, more refined, reaching Out; it was able to emit out better, movedin a ongeT ba ;W side-circular way and no 1 ckwards.m It (?) a_~__ crrc-u-lar. =Uas still not hitting high altitildes but was able to- reach out at further distances, more precise. The inner workings fit better. There were no problems. ADMIN NOTE: Much of the above information was volunteered by source without being specifically directed or questioned by the interviewer. Later in the interview, however, when directed to locate an object of interest at the site, source continued: Something moveable, spinning, part of it was shooting off, coming up and around. The shooting off di,d not go very high; it ~, Iwas damaging at low -levels, _dAidaging-up,close. it did not have the power from far away but the movement, was fast and mad , or it, ain ). ui~ce' e up f expl ~~o also described other characteristics of the object/de-vice but it was not certain (to source) that this ,~s the iame device cited above (perhaps because the descriptions covered a period of time during which the object/device may have changed configuration). In this second series of descriptions the device/object wa rou4d, spinning, backwards, firing out, moving.around, black, w1th a heavy fnterior. It had a movea e inner working that could spit out and make the boom (not further identified). It only fired low but it wa's fast. It was brought out in the open and it did not need a person for t could go (fire?) by itself. It did not go high, so it did not present a high (altitude?) threat but ":.he threat was intended. During the second interview source was directed to describe an occurrence (of special interest) at the site. Source began by saying that there were men who were sent out to border's or bordering posts. These men were here only during the day. There was an object,.a very big object, placed in a green area, a different area from the brown rocky area (a possible reference to the structure/area described in the first interview). The object was tall, rather simple in design and had a component that was spinning whiC-h- could be 6 Approved For Release "seem' QQrWCM" now -R002000310002-4 k~J L~. %.7 T - - ~ w Approved For Release 200'&b PDA-646-00789RO02000310002-4 placed inside the object and taken out. Men left (this object?) the green area with things packed on there backs. A fl ing otJ2 hit the top of a structure (not further I --- Ut r, i -PI I ecl as tb7 what structure , whe`7`e~. Men then moved closer to the structure. It was hot and melting and could have (may have) caught fire. The plans for the occurrence were not elaborate. The plans for the timing and the precision were correct. ADMIN NOTE: Again, much of the above information was volunteered by source without being specifically directed or questioned by the interviewer. Later in the interview, however, when asked to elaborate, source continued: The object in the green area moved sideways or changed direction. The mi-ddle part was spinning and the top part shot out. It operated because of"-I~tsa Tign~ment; it shot in a straight line. What may have been another object (or an ad-.)'u_h_c_t--5-V'closely related object) was described by source as moving fast and speeding across. It was a small object, not big, moveable, and was operated independently. It went out knowing where it was going before it left, followed a path and hit a structure. The area was circled first, watched to know what was there. The small object hit on -me with precision; it was not a miss. It was perfect. ti w-fhe-7concept of shootinr_,out by one of the objects described by source was furtg-er clar-if-i-e-d-as, "From the green area, went right on path, no--dp-viance from the system, line of sight only, line of sight followed, nothing -went wrong." 90_~~ Source provided no further amplifying information which could be construed to concern the nature and scope of the SG1A project's potential for success, or the project's strengths and weaknesses. f. (S/SK/WNINTEL) Source J101.,,was interviewed twice and stated substantially as follows:% During the first interview source4obescribed a structure which looked like (shaped like?) a giant Chrisl7m~astiee located in-an open area. Somewhere identified) there was a weind s4Aped (structure?). To the north (?) there was a large--Wite-dome and to the west (?) a large mirror or somethinz har_~e__TTe*cted back, reflected 1 i hack. Flashees-77- light come back; it was shiny, flecti n9, circular--.--Back at-the giant Christmas tree thmere was a depression like a crater, a 'mapmade crater, with -a-L-fla-t-strucTitur - ucture was long, low, with a- IL e. Inis str square corners and was hardened, reinforced ent-117'rely e an unpaini~ed' unker. functional and devoid o I i k _b When the interviewer asked the source to consider an occurrence 7 Approved For Release ir&'711971 ~qrz_nOMR002000310002-4 Approved For Release 2VUMFXU ~V-k'c4-A-%Pb6-00789ROO2000310002-4 during the time period 27 April 1987 to 15 May 1987, source continued: Monitoriniz-a-nd n t&--qt nf finve sort which iUXolved Precision mechanical sounds, periodic checking by p'e-op.le in white c "'t -- - 'ith-c-lipboards who were walking on what appeared to on s w be big catwalks inside a large enclosed area. This area seemed similar to the inside of an aircraft .carrier with intertwinZ--d 1'a tt-i-ce' f rame work- -aii d stairs zoing from level to level. An 1-r-ei~ a' long way down Aderground was importaix in some way (not fur~'t-her explained).-- The metal Uhristmas tree fell down. It broke in two, two thirds of the way up. The bottom part fell into itself and down. People were looking up and there was a roaring-and flames before the collapse as if something hi-t'it, but there VNE no-t'Xplosion. It was as if a big hand drove it down or bucklecl it down. There was a l(jt of lo Lower here, potential energy here, a lo of tension, mechanicalt-ension. There was a rapi-d-chain of events like it began to buckle first then exploded. it looked almost like a urain"-s-iloin IowE--h-e-i-h-g--, blown, apart. (Note: From thil ~6311-ni--&ntle source refers to this structure as the silo and not the Christmas tree.) The cause of all this has something to do with a thing on high mechanical legs, like tripod legs (not further identified). During the second interview the 7ource was told that the concepts of monitoring and a test were of interest. The source stated that the area was reminiscent ofthe. - Lanc, E e s a aster/gj&g~ow galif ornlatdeser --- Tgero.. wa' n ugly w-"B%-n-k-er li4(:e structu-re--1`K`=e a berm. This structurerrs- primary component was undgy-&-pnd. There was a crescent shape (array) of me~E-ailic (poles with) crosses §~- I-ftterconnected (to Z~nea- --- nvother) and (all) facing in (towards the curve of the crescent). At the end of the crescent was a hugh metallic coffee pot shaped structure. This structure had Xgoiiiithing) t6--do with a tremendous amount of kinetic .&y (see further description hat was kept euar below) t -circulating (within the,structure). There was testing ands' moni oring going on at this locatio? After a final check men (in the area) moved out of the way. There was (an impression of) sometlhUi-az S it into the sky which went uE to apogee, curved towa , and tnen s broken in-to two com nents bya bolt (see-further description S TVVY-which may have comew?7r1o"m"8*the hugh coffee pot structure. This (incident/test) wis a suc&g.~s* An individual in the bunker was able to control ti . .ved size of the success by manipulating Tr"71figures/statistics. The primary prospects for success for the coffee pot were long range. Pressure, however, may be exerted to emphasize the short range goals at the expense of the long range picture. There was the hint of subterfuge with one of the personnel here (not further identified). The coffee pot had something to do 8 Approved For Release 2CM0108/0 AIA-RDP96-00789ROO2000310002-4 Approved For Release 2000108108 -CIA--RI)Pg6-Ob789ROO2000310002-4 with (the concept of) bracketing (as used In the tar&eting of artillery rounds) and-it may be connected in some UU M~ with a7 the sky (see furthe~r deMcription below). 0 The energy a sociaMe-d with the coffee pot was like a muscle at rest,*0~67an oWect pushing up against another object causing a tremendous potential energX, coiled energy, greater than the sum of Chle parts, Une energy Tnc ased geometrically as opposed to arithmetically. (Note: None of these descriptives should be taken literally. The source was obviously trying to explain a c9nce t for which there, were no appropriate words.) The energy was built up and stored in a way, recirculated, but TIT-6 poTenti-a-T was al~~ays there. This energy ~was ass-ociated with the bottom portion of the coffee pot. The energy was kept circulating different than a storage batt~ery; the__Eff-e7-" w9s always there. There was a thick cool fluid and there was something that took the place of in'electric motor brushes). When things passed by the brushes there was energy but this thing (that took the place of the brushes) did it differently. When the energy flowed by there was more efficiency since the brushes--had been replaced. The bottom part was cylindrical in a way; it fed into itself or built onto itself. Source was directed to describe the entire sejuence of events again to include further descriptions of the image of Fhebolt. Source's description was essentially as follows: "It was like a _JJzJ1+,_bolt, of light, like something hit this, maybj_t_h_e__co_f_f_e_7*pot hits this; it is confusing. " "Something starts to go into orbit, starting to go into the ,arc when it is hit 3 goes into pieces." "Something is climbing, curving; it meets something like a bolt." "(The) the . .. bolt is coming down frnm Lbp-.&ky, something in --Qa-r "(The bolt) originates from something in the air, (something) that drifts." "The bolt comes down from above, higher up. "Something higher up hfts "The bolt is white. almost-ppa-que, extremely rapid, direct-ed, channeled. " --"I'm stillo conf u'~'ed. ~" Source' was again directed to perceive the entire sequence of events pertaining to this incident and to describe all thle components at the site in their relative spatial and functional location as pertained to the incident. Source's description of this incident then went essentially as follow: "(Within) the coffee pot (there is) a builLdi g up of en2r.g ." "(At) the ugly bunker (there) is mon`~Iorlng, reporting, relaying information, watching (all of which form the) primary focus of the human activity (in the bunker)." "At the silo there is waiting, bouncing back and off (not further identified). Back at the coffee pot (there is) a 9 Approved For Release 9R002000310002-4 Approved For Release 20oo/dw" i~~-.&AIRi:)P-26400789ROO2000310002-4 release of energy, imbing. "The bunker (is) monitoring, intersecting, almos-C -aiming, digitalizing, computing, recording, checking. Over at the silo (there is) monitoring, reaching, kicking back out." "(At the bunker) men running around but like in a drill, no panic." "Whatever the hell is going on it was successful in a way that p6intE the way to (the) future." "This is a step not a final conclusion." SGIE Lrecuea Lo aOCress specific tasking questions. The following information was related: Potentials for success: A two path answer - long and short range. Given certain constants and licenses, chances for success and broadening or crossing over into other areas were very good. Immediate success was less important except as a stepping stone for the long range, although immediate success was also likely. The concept of success was modified up or down by the manipulation of data thus making success relative. One needed a correlation, a small success to compare it against. Strengths: Newness, i-ts noveltZ.-sneed. It was difficult to detect, difficult to counter. It opened the way for many other Area~s. Weakness: It was biLlky and took time to prepare and to build energy. At this point reliabi'lity could only be assured with extraordinary p-reparation. Under routine conditions reliability decreases. It was costly. it required a large number of these coffee potT. Politically it was difficult o justify in a way for it was a concept whose benefit ;$as a long way down the road. Interviewer Note: source became very confused during the interview and was unable to clearly and sequentially trace the various components utilized in this incident. Even with this "failure" the source was able to convey the impression of a high- tech test of some sort in which an overhead pJ77-tform'was involved in conjunction with a ground based system of tremendous energy output. The result was the interception of a fast moving object in orbital or sub-orbital flight. The test was a success and the potential for future successes was apparently great. Source provided no further amplifying information which could be 10 Approved For Release 20=1 ;2+-RPP96-00789R002000310002-4 Approved For-Release 2MO~N~,.V 96-00789ROO2000310002-4 construed to concern the nature and scope of the SG1A project's potential for success, or the project's strengths and weaknesses. 3. (S/SK/WNINTEL) The above SUN STREAK sources, although not in complete agreement,. seemed to have collectively described an incident (test) which involved several different locations or structures, one or more of which may have been in flight. The test involved energy or projected e__ _some sort and resulted in th_j--d`e9-t-r--ucH_i_o_n-6- --a''target by unusua burning or a peculiar explosive effect. 4. (S/SK/WNINTEL) Direct access to raw transcript information is limited to personnel with SKEET access only. If access to this information is necessary, contact DT-S directly to arrange for an appointment to review appropriate transcript. SKEET transcripts are not releasable outside the confines of the SUN STREAK office. 5. (SISKIWNINTEL) Enclosed herewith is an Intelligence Evaluation Sheet (IES) (TAB C). Please annotate one appropriately for each source (make necessary copies) and return the sheets to DT-S (Ops) within 30 days of receipt of this report. Care and diligence in annotating this IES will aid in the refinement of SUN STREAK assets and thereby enhance SUN STREAK's ability to p~~ovide WbrWnformbtion of intelligence value. 3 Enclosures TAB A & B Sketches TAB C IES Approved For Release 2000/08/08- -00789R002000310002-4