SG1J rZ2 I 6vaLP96 -007199 IT602MOMMV-4W ENT .20001081 memorandum DATE: 2 7 APR 1990 S- 136/DT -EPLY TO. DT TTN OF. SUBUIECT: SUN STREAK (U) TO: Oc GC Refs: a. DIA/DR memo S/NF-25-90, Sunstreak Program, 30 Mar 90. b. DAMI-ZA memo, Sunstreak Program, 6 Apr 90. c. DAMI-PO memo, Memorandum for 5 Apr 90. SG1J SG1 I d. DIA/DT memo, Memorandum for 6 Apr 90 e. DIA/ED memo C-571/ED, undated. 1. (U) There are a number of things going on re SUN STREAK that I wanted to summarize for your information and to ask for your advice and assistance. 2. (S/NF) Ted. I don't know how much Lew has told you, but there's a long audit-trail that got us where we are. In brief: a. (S/NF) After the December 1989 MIB decision, the DR and DCSI agreed to what was bein transferred and what procedures were to be followed (ref a. and b.~. b. (S/NF) You'll notice that ref a. says DIA retains "oversight" responsibilities. This has surfaced in conjunction with the DCSI project officer wanting TDY funds (refs c. and d. apply). Our position has been that we should not release any TDY funds carte blanche in light of our continuing oversight responsibilities, our retention of the resources, and our normal good and proper management procedures. We'll release funds when the purpose is identified in writing, meets the objectives of the DR and DCSI agreements, and fulfills our Agency requirements for (after the fact) accounting of expenditures. c. (U) Ted. We understand DCSI approached you to MIPR some $30K of DIA funds. Please do not do that or give any money from OC or DT accounts unless we OK it in writing--unless Bill advises.to the contrary (see para 3 below). CLASSIFIED BY DT DECLASSIFY ON OADR OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 1-90) RE~EASABUE 1U I-Ul.LIGAN N.""'TIONAL4 (REV' GSAFPMR(4iCFR)IGI-II-G 5010-1 4 0 '6006 Approved For Release 2000/0SW..rQit.RDP96-00789R0021 009 3-4201-760 LU I Approved For Release 2000/08/0k,~C-!A,,-R P96-00789ROO2100090006-4 3. (U) Bill. We developed the procedures briefly outlined above to fulfill DIA's obligations as we understand them (and I'll be the first to admit not everything is crystal clear in this matter, as you know). From your perspective, are we doing the right thing or should we change our thinking/procedures? Because we want an excellent audit trail of our involvement--as is our practice--please give us your advise/instructions in writing as your schedule permits (obviously, the sooner the better so we can nail down these loose ends). 4. (U) Please note that, per ref e., there' be a status review the re of this project at next month's )CB. 5 Enclosures H ~N 1. S/NF-25-90/DR, 30 Mar (S/NF) JOHN ICH 2. DAMI-ZA, 2 Apr (U) Assi, t n Deputy Director si,t n 3. DAMI-PO, 5 Apr (U) f6r /ientific and f r c 4. U-117/DT, 6 Apr (U) ~ec nical Intelligence pt ni 5. C-571/ED, undated (C) cc: VP-SF OSC-PDO 2 L Approved For Release 2000/08/1% :0 DP96-00789ROO2100090006-4