Lo% Ir f % M P=@ Approvie For Release 2001)H*%elIA-,~-.;~,P46-00788ROO0400120001-5 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS IAOPS-H-S It SUBJECT: SPECIAL ANALYTIC MPORT INFORMATION (U) _0@r SECTION I REPORT RBOIREMNT (D - 54) 1. (U) The information provided as enclosure to this report was obtained in response to a collection requirement provided by your office. The information is from an unconfirmed source, therefore caution is warranted in its use. This office has been tasked by the Commanding General., Intelligcnce and Security Command, to evaluate and comment on the operational value of the information provided, as well as to ascertain tho accuracy of the source. 2. (U) In order to comply with this directive, request the information provided as an enclosure be evaluated and comments be provided this office no later than __ - 4 This should be accomplished by responding to questlLons pro- vided within Section III of this report. 3. (U) Section II contains special instructions for the analysts. 4. (U) Project Number: 5. (U) Requestor: ACS1 6. (S) Source Number: 417.5 7- (S) Interrogator Number: (0-5 8. (S) Date Information was Obtained: 24 GF-P Times: FM_Q @OTO_Q&aQ 9. (.5 ) Specific information provided by the requestor in support. of required source targeting is: 5 10. Specific information provided to the inLerrogator to aid in source targeting was: :Z+J" uki@@P' krAck (@Ur% CA 6(ZLQf4_J lit, oncs'r A,. A , 1.1. S ) Specific information provided to the source for target orientation was: C, CLASSIFIED BY: MISGI HQDA (DAMI-ISH) Dtd; 0516ooz in 7E Review On: Approved For Releasu r"Ar"E' "W002 130788ROO0400120001-5 Mob, Approved For Release 2001/5MG?6eNAA-RQR R000400120001-5 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS 12. (-'5 SG1 B 13. (U) Date information forwarded: 14. (U) Has additional data been requested: YES NO 15. (U) Priority: URGENT ROUTINE 16. Remarks: SECTION II INSTRUCTIONS TO ANALYSTS 1. (U) The material you have been given to review has been acquired from a new and potentially valuable source of intelligence. Work is currently being con- ducted on how to improve th6 accuracy and reliability of -the data. Your atten- tion to the evaluation sheet and your remarks will be the basis for our assessment of this new collection technique. Thereforeq the effort you expend will greatly assist us and will ultimately result in you receiving more information of increas- ing accuracy and reliability. 2. (U) While formulating your judgements concerning the information provided, the following comments concerning this new source of intelligence may be helpful. Foremost, the information is likely to consist of a mixture of correct and in- correct elements. Specifically: a. (S) The de222:L @tive elements are generally of higher reliability than judgements or labels as to what is being described (recreational swimming pool may be mistaken for water urification pools, an aircraft hull may be mistaken for a submarine hull, etc. . Therefore, seemingly appropriate descriptive elements should not be rejected because of mislabeling. b. (S) The data often contains gaps (in a '-building complex, for example, perhaps only two of the buildings may be described, and an airfield-may be added that isn't there). Such gaps or additions should not be taken to mean. that the rest of the data is necessarily inaccurate. 3. (S) Therefore, a recommended approach is to first examine the entire information packet to obtain an overall flavor of the response, reserving final judgement even in the face of certain errors, and then go back through for a more detailed analysis. 4- (U) If you have questions regarding the data you have received, or its evaluation please contact this office (IAOPS-H-S) at any time. 110 "1 NAMP600788RO00400120001-5 Approved For Release 200 3 0-7 :"C A- 2