r n n 7- m PAPER QRKING Approved For Release 200110 R P9 -00788ROO2000240026-7 D DOD Evaluation committee Briefing - 27 September1979 1. Introduction/Background. a. Tasking and my background b. Early visits to SRI and AMSAA 2. Mission 3. SRI Visit: 15-17 Nov a. Initial orientation b. Work statement/training C. Criteria for selection of subjects Well thought of Above average intel Thinks well of himself Articulate "Artistic" d. Witnessed session 4. SRI Visit: 12-15 Dec Adventurous open minded Successful Muture and stable a. Screening potential subjects b. Review recent SRI experiments C. Review of tapes d. Relationship of subject/interviewer e. Role of outbound team f. Factors that inhibit success (1) Prior knowledge of target possibilities (2) Absence of feedback (3) Doing trivial tasks (4) Use of repetitive target sequences g. Factors that enhance success (1) Interest factor (2) Seriousness of purpose (3) Monitor/interviewer to ask questions (4) Practice with feedback 5. Selection of Individuals: Target: 3 individuals a. Considered 251 b. Interviewed 117 C. Initial Results - 30-35 potential candidates d. 14 Feb - SRI visited - results e. Intelligence background of individuals Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 WOPKING PAPER WORKING PAPF-R ;e 21 Z Approved For Release 20 IA-RDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 6. Began training late Feb stopped March 7. Training with SRI - 13 May Second phase of training just started 8. Training problems a. Environment b. Work related situations c. Availability d. Frequency e. Time of day 9. Target Selection Process 10. Current Program(s) a. Training at SRI b. "Beacon" situations C. Coordinate work - 3 levels d. "Real" situations e. CDEC training 11. Development of TCC .12. Future objectives: a. Continue development of individual abilities b. Complete training at SRI (Dec 79) C. Apply RV techniques to "live problems" d. Determine tasking procedures e. Align resources properly 13. Evaluation Report Approved For Release 2001/04/02 C@A@g9f 2000240026-7 I-AU88ROO V31,411C I WORKING PAPEIZ % - S i@w N R Approved For Release 2001/049WZGVAqkkOP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 MISSION STATEMENT (S/ORCON) To establish a program using psychoenergics for intelligence applications. specifically, utilizing that field,of psychoenergics referred to as REMOTE VIEWING. The program encompasses the following: - Establishing a training program in REMOTE VIEWING utilizing selected INSCOM personnel. - Establishing procedures for intelligence collection techniques utilizing REMOTE VIEWING. - Establishing a mechanism for responding to intelligence collection-requirements (tasking) using REMOTE-VIEWING. CLASSIFIED BY: Director, DIA DECLASSIFY ON: 17 Mar 99 EXTENDED BY: Director, DIA REASON: 2-301-C (3) (6) A Aeprozed For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDID96-cQUibo 19cAPAME 4 z> :1;)N Ql;gnrT r6 I Approved For Release 200t 401 -RDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 TARGET SELECTION PROCESS A. TARGETS 1. Location 2. Activity 3. Time B. METHOD OF TARGETING 1. Beacon (Human and objects) a. initial target pool b. Random (local) C. Operational designate (i.e. ME) 2. Geographic Coordinates a. Target Pool (1) "Fun Targets"/Initial'orientation (2) Series 200 Map Targets (3) TK Targets b. Operational Designate 3. UTM Coordinates C. DEVELOPMENT OF TARGETS 1. Beacon - Initial Target Pool a. 50 Targets selected b@ individual outside project. b. Secured by another in ividual. C. How utilized. 2. Beacon - Random 3. Operational Designate 4. Geographic Coordinates -- "Fun Targets" a. Pool designed by NCOIC b. Stored in Safe -- Access limited 5. Geographic Coordinates - Series 200 Map Targets a. Pool designed by Project Manager b. Stored in Safe - Access limited Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 r rmn rT Approved For Release 2001/04~-02~4aAURDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 6. Geographic coordinates - TK Targets a. pool designed by JIPD Access controlled by SSO. b. stored in SSO Area -- 7. Geographic coordinates operational Designate a. "Customer" Request ntrolled by Project manager- b. Data stored in safe access co 8. UTM Coordinates a. Weekly targets provided by CDEC b. Data controlled by COL Moses, CDEC 2 Approved For Release 2001/04/02 CIA-RDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 Q Ml,@kzk rn sp %2' . -F-T77 U- N A SGlA Approved For Relea 4/.02- STAT ri) 7-- nrjC* )R -@,r:7P 7Q 0 Qj Q) yj Q) INN Q-1 Target lb .Td?ntification Status Remarks IDAUGI 4LU- ALL I N/A 1-3 lu-rm/F-YENT x x QN-GoiNG TRNC- QMI-Y A. 5 IST-P ALL ALL X ON - GQA NG TRNG ONLY 26 SEP TBV TBD OACSI SPECIAL 7-ZZ) AWIAI.T IKPO FRUA DO 90@ MT G? 3 EP 79 toss? Go i RG 1, 7 F 5 4 (@EOZPOLAR- X jDATA. UNl)ZPCOjN& ANALVSIS@1)C47, i5EP,c@Ir-isd TZ@D 3,(o F4s TGD IT11J& INITIAL GUIDAI-ACE Annrov ed Fo r Painnap- 9 CIA-RbP66-b07h8ROO20002400qr,-7 "k - ), A k % KL 2001 tA-) Approved For Release.' /0 OR 96-00788ROO2000240026-7 W TARGET CORRELATION CHART (TCC)* ASSIGNED VALUE DESCRIPTION 1 Absolutely no target correlation. 2 Drawings, narrative, and feedback reaction have minimal target correlation. 3 Increased target correlation, identity of target could not be determined. 4 Many target correlation factors readily recognizable. Target identity possibilities narrowed. 5** RV data shows-unmistakable cor- relation to the target. Target possibilities can now be typified. 6 Little or no extraneous RV data present. Target identity can be readily matched. 7 Correct naming of the target. RATING None (0%) Low (15%) Low-Moderate (30%) Moderate (50%) Moderate-Hig (70%) High (80%) Direct Hit (100%) *Target Correlation Chart (TCC) was established not to prove or disprove Remote Viewing (RV) , rather, it was je-signed to measure RV learning trends and to provide Pro-ject Management personnel a readily available management tool. **Current state-of-the-art indicates this level of expertise is the norm. for an experienced Remote Viewer. CLASSIFIED BY: Director, DIA DECLASSIFY ON: 31 May 99 EXTENDED BY: Director, DIA REASON: 2-301-C (3) (6) Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-007 4OqO2 ^"OR 0 MV11dij r V fA ME Lu --J 0(@ lu 0 QLl cl@ LLJ i, ApOroved Fo@ Release 2031/04/02 Cl ik-FIDF~96!00'r88RO)2000~?4W297d3!3c)I c 2 -d3SG -/?X "Ixx A01V d3SR -d3S j; 9-S V) 6391 Em,97, -q(WZj Ln Galvd L 57 N +-. -10 5"5 -inn z 0 a:)V4 -CD NnrEg-Nnr, Ll t: Nnrgi - t4nr oi N NOISVIEIS; r4ON nr6 -tqnre nr3 4(vwgz -A'VWOZ E2 AvW 61 - AVW S I AYW I ...... 8d'V8;3 - s8v ZZ 0, .0 Is" 11Z - ScNs I co i7l @1,0 9 t-,. A- SVW lVa- -.bVW 91 it cq O'l -,bvw jr C\j 8VW F. -Gr:M S7Z G-alve Man UN SAVA 14NI SM @l VW3 8:1 U-) llZq-. m cl-j t-- -'Z -LVCl 0 C) LU E f LLJ Lij 0 C) w LO App@oved For, Rele S(~oll/b4/a2(.OCIA-nP)aOI89RO(12C[DO 400!q-7 Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7 TARGET CORRELATION RATINGS ASSIGNED VALUE TOTAL 1 40 2 48 3 36 4 6 5 2 6 7 0 Not rated 9 Not graded 1 TOTAL NOTE: 60 sessions adversely influenced by noise or work related problems. Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP96-00788ROO2000240026-7